94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27721261)
21. The feasibility of colorectal cancer detection using dual-energy computed tomography with iodine mapping.
Boellaard TN; Henneman OD; Streekstra GJ; Venema HW; Nio CY; van Dorth-Rombouts MC; Stoker J
Clin Radiol; 2013 Aug; 68(8):799-806. PubMed ID: 23615035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis.
Takx RA; Blomberg BA; El Aidi H; Habets J; de Jong PA; Nagel E; Hoffmann U; Leiner T
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging versus contrast-enhanced 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the detection of colorectal liver metastases.
Seo HJ; Kim MJ; Lee JD; Chung WS; Kim YE
Invest Radiol; 2011 Sep; 46(9):548-55. PubMed ID: 21577131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Combined Application of Gadoxetic Acid Disodium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) in the Diagnosis of Chronic Liver Disease-Induced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.
Li X; Li C; Wang R; Ren J; Yang J; Zhang Y
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144247. PubMed ID: 26629904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of virtual cystoscopy and ultrasonography for bladder cancer detection: a meta-analysis.
Qu X; Huang X; Wu L; Huang G; Ping X; Yan W
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):188-97. PubMed ID: 20452159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for focal liver lesions: a meta-analysis.
Xie L; Guang Y; Ding H; Cai A; Huang Y
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):854-61. PubMed ID: 21531500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Incremental value of liver MR imaging in patients with potentially curable colorectal hepatic metastasis detected at CT: a prospective comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging, and a combination of both MR techniques.
Kim HJ; Lee SS; Byun JH; Kim JC; Yu CS; Park SH; Kim AY; Ha HK
Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):712-22. PubMed ID: 25286324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis with sliding slab ray-sum interpretation of low-dose unenhanced CT and standard-dose i.v. contrast-enhanced CT scans.
Seo H; Lee KH; Kim HJ; Kim K; Kang SB; Kim SY; Kim YH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 193(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 19542400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT with bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastasis: a meta-analysis.
Cheng X; Li Y; Xu Z; Bao L; Li D; Wang J
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):779-87. PubMed ID: 21712464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Usefulness of combining sequentially acquired gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and resovist-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with computed tomography hepatic arteriography and computed tomography arterioportography using 16-slice multidetector computed tomography.
Kim YK; Kwak HS; Han YM; Kim CS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(5):702-11. PubMed ID: 17895780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Revisiting the potential signs of colorectal cancer on contrast-enhanced computed tomography without bowel preparation.
Naqvi J; Hosmane S; Lapsia S
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(8):2993-3001. PubMed ID: 26194811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Diagnostic efficacy of 3-D hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography in the detection of tubal occlusion: Systematic meta-analysis.
Yu J; Cai M; Liang W; Deng Z; Xie Y
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1418-25. PubMed ID: 26098684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Diagnostic Accuracy of Noncontrast CT in Detecting Acute Appendicitis: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies.
Xiong B; Zhong B; Li Z; Zhou F; Hu R; Feng Z; Xu S; Chen F
Am Surg; 2015 Jun; 81(6):626-9. PubMed ID: 26031278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnosis of colorectal hepatic metastases: Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography versus contrast-enhanced computed tomography versus superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging.
Muhi A; Ichikawa T; Motosugi U; Sou H; Nakajima H; Sano K; Kitamura T; Faima Z; Fukushima K; Araki T; Iino H; Mori Y; Fujii H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Nov; 32(5):1132-40. PubMed ID: 21031519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of unenhanced and contrast-enhanced spiral CT for assessing interval change in patients with colorectal liver metastases.
Park JH; Nazarian LN; Halpern EJ; Feld RI; Lev-Toaff AS; Parker L; Wechsler RJ
Acad Radiol; 2001 Aug; 8(8):698-704. PubMed ID: 11508748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessment of tumor recurrence in patients with colorectal cancer and elevated carcinoembryonic antigen level: FDG PET/CT versus contrast-enhanced 64-MDCT of the chest and abdomen.
Metser U; You J; McSweeney S; Freeman M; Hendler A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Mar; 194(3):766-71. PubMed ID: 20173157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: a meta-analysis].
Jiang H; Chen J; Jiang JJ; Ye Z
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 20(11):828-32. PubMed ID: 23206301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Comparison of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and enhancement CT in diagnosing regional lymph node metastasis of colorectal cancer].
Wang XY; Rao LJ; Yi QQ; Chen ZF; Li ZP; Zhang XS; Shi XC; Yi C
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 93(29):2288-91. PubMed ID: 24300147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Hu Q; Wang XY; Zhu SY; Kang LK; Xiao YJ; Zheng HY
Acta Radiol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 24436445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Solitary pulmonary nodules: meta-analytic comparison of cross-sectional imaging modalities for diagnosis of malignancy.
Cronin P; Dwamena BA; Kelly AM; Carlos RC
Radiology; 2008 Mar; 246(3):772-82. PubMed ID: 18235105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
