These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27721881)

  • 1. Reliability of Breast Ultrasound BI-RADS Final Assessment in Mammographically Negative Patients with Nipple Discharge and Radiologic Predictors of Malignancy.
    Park CJ; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Kim MJ
    J Breast Cancer; 2016 Sep; 19(3):308-315. PubMed ID: 27721881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Usefulness of ultrasound elastography in reducing the number of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3 lesions on ultrasonography.
    Cho N; Lim J; Moon WK
    Ultrasonography; 2014 Apr; 33(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 24936502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.
    Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS
    Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Ultrasound examination of breast microcalcifications: luxury or necessity?].
    Balu-Maestro C; Chapellier C; Ben Taaritt I; Fournol M
    J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 87(12 Pt 1):1849-58. PubMed ID: 17213769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Role of ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in the management of radiologic-pathologic discordance: a retrospective single-centre study.
    Vatteroni G; Pinna G; Trimboli RM; Levi R; Bolengo I; Patrone F; Volpe D; Fernandes B; Bernardi D
    Radiol Med; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39102107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories.
    Liberman L; Abramson AF; Squires FB; Glassman JR; Morris EA; Dershaw DD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9648759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nonpalpable BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: sonographic findings and pathology correlation.
    Elverici E; Barça AN; Aktaş H; Özsoy A; Zengin B; Çavuşoğlu M; Araz L
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015; 21(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 25835079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. JOURNAL CLUB: Diagnostic Utility of MRI After Negative or Inconclusive Mammography for the Evaluation of Pathologic Nipple Discharge.
    Bahl M; Gadd MA; Lehman CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):1404-1410. PubMed ID: 28898125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictors of Invasive Breast Cancer in Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy.
    Shin YJ; Kim SM; Yun B; Jang M; Kim B; Lee SH
    J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Feb; 38(2):481-488. PubMed ID: 30069893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does power Doppler ultrasonography improve the BI-RADS category assessment and diagnostic accuracy of solid breast lesions?
    Tozaki M; Fukuma E
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):706-10. PubMed ID: 21596798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adding Ultrasound to the Evaluation of Patients with Pathologic Nipple Discharge to Diagnose Additional Breast Cancers: Preliminary Data.
    Yoon H; Yoon JH; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Park BW; Kim MJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Aug; 41(8):2099-107. PubMed ID: 25952162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy.
    Orel SG; Kay N; Reynolds C; Sullivan DC
    Radiology; 1999 Jun; 211(3):845-50. PubMed ID: 10352614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. BI-RADS Category 5 Assessments at Diagnostic Breast Imaging:Outcomes Analysis Based on Lesion Descriptors.
    Yao MM; Joe BN; Sickles EA; Lee CS
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Aug; 26(8):1048-1052. PubMed ID: 30195413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In the Setting of Negative Mammogram, Is Additional Breast Ultrasound Necessary for Evaluation of Breast Pain?
    Mema E; Cho E; Ryu YK; Jadeja P; Wynn R; Taback B; Ha R
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2019; 48(2):117-120. PubMed ID: 29402490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Improved Nomogram to Reduce False-Positive Biopsy Rates of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Ultrasonography Category 4A Lesions.
    Hai L; Feng Y; Zhao J; Tang Q; Wang X; Cao X; Xiao C
    Cancer Control; 2022; 29():10732748221122703. PubMed ID: 37735939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retroareolar masses and intraductal abnormalities detected on screening ultrasound: can biopsy be avoided?
    Guo Y; Raghu M; Durand M; Hooley R
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 91(1090):20170816. PubMed ID: 29338316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiologic findings of lobular carcinoma in situ: mammography and ultrasonography.
    Choi BB; Kim SH; Park CS; Cha ES; Lee AW
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2011 Feb; 39(2):59-63. PubMed ID: 21213330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of benignity or malignancy of a lesion using BI-RADS.
    Masroor I
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 Nov; 15(11):686-8. PubMed ID: 16300702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reassessment and Follow-Up Results of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Detected on Screening Breast Ultrasound.
    Chae EY; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ; Kim HH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Mar; 206(3):666-72. PubMed ID: 26901026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic value of breast ultrasound in mammography BI-RADS 0 and clinically indeterminate or suspicious of malignancy breast lesions.
    Dobrosavljević A; Rakić S; Nikoli B; Raznatović SJ; Dikić SD; Milosević Z; Jurisić A; Skrobić M
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Mar; 73(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 27295907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.