These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2772213)

  • 1. Thrombus-trapping efficiency of the Greenfield filter in vivo.
    Thompson BH; Cragg AH; Smith TP; Bareniewski H; Barnhart WH; De Jong SC
    Radiology; 1989 Sep; 172(3 Pt 2):979-81. PubMed ID: 2772213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental comparison of percutaneous vena caval devices: titanium Greenfield filter versus bird's nest filter.
    Burke PE; Michna BA; Harvey CF; Crute SL; Sobel M; Greenfield LJ
    J Vasc Surg; 1987 Jul; 6(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 3599283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro evaluation of clot capture efficiency of an absorbable vena cava filter.
    Dria SJ; Eggers MD
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2016 Oct; 4(4):472-8. PubMed ID: 27639002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inferior vena cava filters: in vitro comparison of clot trapping and flow dynamics.
    Katsamouris AA; Waltman AC; Delichatsios MA; Athanasoulis CA
    Radiology; 1988 Feb; 166(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 3336712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal central trapping (OPCETRA) vena caval filter: results of experimental studies.
    Kraimps JL; De La Faye D; Drouineau J; Bensignor E; Barbier J
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1992 Nov; 3(4):697-701. PubMed ID: 1446131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of clinically available inferior vena cava filters with an in vitro physiologic simulation of the vena cava.
    Simon M; Rabkin DJ; Kleshinski S; Kim D; Ransil BJ
    Radiology; 1993 Dec; 189(3):769-74. PubMed ID: 8234702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vivo evaluation of vena caval filters: can function be linked to design characteristics?
    Proctor MC; Cho KJ; Greenfield LJ
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2000; 23(6):460-5. PubMed ID: 11232895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Thrombus-trapping efficiency of the LGM (Vena Tech) and titanium Greenfield filters in vivo.
    Millward SF; Marsh JI; Pon C; Moher D
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1992 Feb; 3(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 1540709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evolution of hook design for fixation of the titanium Greenfield filter.
    Greenfield LJ; Cho KJ; Tauscher JR
    J Vasc Surg; 1990 Sep; 12(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 2398592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [In vitro evaluation of Dibie-Musset vena caval filter].
    Dibie A; Kareco T; Musset D; Dufaux J; Counord JL; Laborde F; Flaud P
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1994 Jan; 87(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 7811146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Entrapment of sized emboli by the KMA-Greenfield intracaval filter.
    Schroeder TM; Elkins RC; Greenfield LJ
    Surgery; 1978 Apr; 83(4):435-9. PubMed ID: 635779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro evaluation of vena cava filters.
    Hammer FD; Rousseau HP; Joffre FG; Sentenac BP; Tran-Van T; Barthelemy RP
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1994; 5(6):869-76. PubMed ID: 7873867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vena cava umbrella filter: experimental, hemodynamic and embolization studies.
    Harjola PT; Höckerstedt K; Scheinin TM; Standertskjöld-Nordenstam CG; Tähti E
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1975; 16(6):626-31. PubMed ID: 1194349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Percutaneous retrieval of Kimray-Greenfield vena caval filter.
    Schneider PA; Bednarkiewicz M
    Radiology; 1985 Aug; 156(2):547. PubMed ID: 4011923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monorail system for percutaneous repositioning of the Greenfield vena caval filter.
    Guthaner DF; Wyatt JO; Mehigan JT; Wright AM; Breen JF; Wexler L
    Radiology; 1990 Sep; 176(3):872-4. PubMed ID: 2389052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Numerical analysis of the hemodynamics and embolus capture of a greenfield vena cava filter.
    Swaminathan TN; Hu HH; Patel AA
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Jun; 128(3):360-70. PubMed ID: 16706585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The malpositioned Greenfield filter: lessons learned.
    Otchy DP; Elliott BM
    Am Surg; 1987 Oct; 53(10):580-3. PubMed ID: 3674601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New optional IVC filter for percutaneous retrieval--in vitro evaluation of embolus capturing efficiency.
    Günther RW; Neuerburg J; Mossdorf A; Pfeffer J; Høj AR; Mølgaard-Nielsen A; Bücker A; Schmitz-Rode T
    Rofo; 2005 May; 177(5):632-6. PubMed ID: 15871077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro evaluation of caval filters.
    Robinson JD; Madison MT; Hunter DW; Castaneda-Zuniga WR; Amplatz K
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1988 Dec; 11(6):346-51. PubMed ID: 3145810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro function of an adjustable temporary venous spring filter: comparison with the temporary RF02 filter and the permanent Greenfield vena cava filter.
    Hosaka J; Roy S; Kvernebo K; Enge I; Laerum F
    Acad Radiol; 1998 Sep; 5(9):620-5. PubMed ID: 9750891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.