These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. In vitro evaluation of clot capture efficiency of an absorbable vena cava filter. Dria SJ; Eggers MD J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2016 Oct; 4(4):472-8. PubMed ID: 27639002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inferior vena cava filters: in vitro comparison of clot trapping and flow dynamics. Katsamouris AA; Waltman AC; Delichatsios MA; Athanasoulis CA Radiology; 1988 Feb; 166(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 3336712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimal central trapping (OPCETRA) vena caval filter: results of experimental studies. Kraimps JL; De La Faye D; Drouineau J; Bensignor E; Barbier J J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1992 Nov; 3(4):697-701. PubMed ID: 1446131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative evaluation of clinically available inferior vena cava filters with an in vitro physiologic simulation of the vena cava. Simon M; Rabkin DJ; Kleshinski S; Kim D; Ransil BJ Radiology; 1993 Dec; 189(3):769-74. PubMed ID: 8234702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo evaluation of vena caval filters: can function be linked to design characteristics? Proctor MC; Cho KJ; Greenfield LJ Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2000; 23(6):460-5. PubMed ID: 11232895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Thrombus-trapping efficiency of the LGM (Vena Tech) and titanium Greenfield filters in vivo. Millward SF; Marsh JI; Pon C; Moher D J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1992 Feb; 3(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 1540709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evolution of hook design for fixation of the titanium Greenfield filter. Greenfield LJ; Cho KJ; Tauscher JR J Vasc Surg; 1990 Sep; 12(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 2398592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Monorail system for percutaneous repositioning of the Greenfield vena caval filter. Guthaner DF; Wyatt JO; Mehigan JT; Wright AM; Breen JF; Wexler L Radiology; 1990 Sep; 176(3):872-4. PubMed ID: 2389052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Numerical analysis of the hemodynamics and embolus capture of a greenfield vena cava filter. Swaminathan TN; Hu HH; Patel AA J Biomech Eng; 2006 Jun; 128(3):360-70. PubMed ID: 16706585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New optional IVC filter for percutaneous retrieval--in vitro evaluation of embolus capturing efficiency. Günther RW; Neuerburg J; Mossdorf A; Pfeffer J; Høj AR; Mølgaard-Nielsen A; Bücker A; Schmitz-Rode T Rofo; 2005 May; 177(5):632-6. PubMed ID: 15871077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro evaluation of caval filters. Robinson JD; Madison MT; Hunter DW; Castaneda-Zuniga WR; Amplatz K Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1988 Dec; 11(6):346-51. PubMed ID: 3145810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro function of an adjustable temporary venous spring filter: comparison with the temporary RF02 filter and the permanent Greenfield vena cava filter. Hosaka J; Roy S; Kvernebo K; Enge I; Laerum F Acad Radiol; 1998 Sep; 5(9):620-5. PubMed ID: 9750891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]