227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27722227)
1. Artefacts of implant-supported single crowns - Impact of material composition on artefact volume on dental MRI.
Hilgenfeld T; Prager M; Schwindling FS; Heil A; Kuchenbecker S; Rammelsberg P; Bendszus M; Heiland S
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(3):301-308. PubMed ID: 27722227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.
Kohal RJ; Klaus G; Strub JR
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PETRA, MSVAT-SPACE and SEMAC sequences for metal artefact reduction in dental MR imaging.
Hilgenfeld T; Prager M; Heil A; Schwindling FS; Nittka M; Grodzki D; Rammelsberg P; Bendszus M; Heiland S
Eur Radiol; 2017 Dec; 27(12):5104-5112. PubMed ID: 28698944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with CAD/CAM-fabricated porcelain crown and zirconia-based framework.
Takaba M; Tanaka S; Ishiura Y; Baba K
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):402-7. PubMed ID: 23289495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Shock absorption capacity of restorative materials for dental implant prostheses: an in vitro study.
Menini M; Conserva E; Tealdo T; Bevilacqua M; Pera F; Signori A; Pera P
Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(6):549-56. PubMed ID: 24179969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of pulse sequence parameters at 1.5 T and 3.0 T on MRI artefacts produced by metal-ceramic restorations.
Cortes AR; Abdala-Junior R; Weber M; Arita ES; Ackerman JL
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(8):20150136. PubMed ID: 26084475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retrievable metal ceramic implant-supported fixed prostheses with milled titanium frameworks and all-ceramic crowns: retrospective clinical study with up to 10 years of follow-up.
Maló P; de Araújo Nobre M; Borges J; Almeida R
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):256-64. PubMed ID: 22339902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of core thickness differences on post-fatigue indentation fracture resistance of veneered zirconia crowns.
Alhasanyah A; Vaidyanathan TK; Flinton RJ
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):383-90. PubMed ID: 23387466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging artifacts of five common dental materials].
Xu Y; Yu R
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Jun; 33(3):230-3. PubMed ID: 26281247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Ability of Dental Specialists to Distinguish Lateral Incisor Metal-Free From Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal Implant Supported Crowns.
De Melo EV; Kauling AE; Freitas SF; Cardoso AC; Ferreira CF
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2014 Dec; 22(4):153-8. PubMed ID: 26466439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic single crowns.
Pjetursson BE; Valente NA; Strasding M; Zwahlen M; Liu S; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():199-214. PubMed ID: 30328190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
Larsson C
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture Strength of Zirconia and Alumina Ceramic Crowns Supported by Implants.
Traini T; Sorrentino R; Gherlone E; Perfetti F; Bollero P; Zarone F
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():352-9. PubMed ID: 24779915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of fatigue resistance and failure modes between metal-ceramic and all-ceramic crowns by cyclic loading in water.
Nicolaisen MH; Bahrami G; Finlay S; Isidor F
J Dent; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1613-20. PubMed ID: 25174946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Survival and chipping of zirconia-based and metal-ceramic implant-supported single crowns.
Schwarz S; Schröder C; Hassel A; Bömicke W; Rammelsberg P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e119-25. PubMed ID: 21985745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture load of titanium crowns coated with gold or titanium nitride and bonded to low-fusing porcelain.
Lim HP; Kim JH; Lee KM; Park SW
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Mar; 105(3):164-70. PubMed ID: 21356408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical performance of monolithic zirconia crowns on titanium-zirconium reduced-diameter implants in the molar area: Interim data at three years of a randomized controlled trial.
Zumstein K; Waller T; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE; Benic G; Mühlemann S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Dec; 34(12):1354-1362. PubMed ID: 37668109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Failure modes and fracture origins of porcelain veneers on bilayer dental crowns.
Liu Y; Liu G; Wang Y; Shen JZ; Feng H
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 24596912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An investigation of heat transfer to the implant-bone interface when drilling through a zirconia crown attached to a titanium or zirconia abutment.
Mason AG; Sutton A; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1119-25. PubMed ID: 24951389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro fracture strength of teeth restored with different all-ceramic crown systems.
Potiket N; Chiche G; Finger IM
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Nov; 92(5):491-5. PubMed ID: 15523339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
