These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27722355)

  • 1. Impacts of coal ash on methylmercury production and the methylating microbial community in anaerobic sediment slurries.
    Schwartz GE; Redfern LK; Ikuma K; Gunsch CK; Ruhl LS; Vengosh A; Hsu-Kim H
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2016 Nov; 18(11):1427-1439. PubMed ID: 27722355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Net methylation of mercury in estuarine sediment microcosms amended with dissolved, nanoparticulate, and microparticulate mercuric sulfides.
    Zhang T; Kucharzyk KH; Kim B; Deshusses MA; Hsu-Kim H
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9133-41. PubMed ID: 25007388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Carbon Amendments Alter Microbial Community Structure and Net Mercury Methylation Potential in Sediments.
    Christensen GA; Somenahally AC; Moberly JG; Miller CM; King AJ; Gilmour CC; Brown SD; Podar M; Brandt CC; Brooks SC; Palumbo AV; Wall JD; Elias DA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Feb; 84(3):. PubMed ID: 29150503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Environmental impacts of the Tennessee Valley Authority Kingston coal ash spill. 2. Effect of coal ash on methylmercury in historically contaminated river sediments.
    Deonarine A; Bartov G; Johnson TM; Ruhl L; Vengosh A; Hsu-Kim H
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Feb; 47(4):2100-8. PubMed ID: 23249246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Production of methylmercury by methanogens in mercury contaminated estuarine sediments.
    Wang Y; Roth S; Schaefer JK; Reinfelder JR; Yee N
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2020 Dec; 367(23):. PubMed ID: 33242089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Manganese(iv) oxide amendments reduce methylmercury concentrations in sediment porewater.
    Vlassopoulos D; Kanematsu M; Henry EA; Goin J; Leven A; Glaser D; Brown SS; O'Day PA
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2018 Dec; 20(12):1746-1760. PubMed ID: 30393799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examination of mercury contamination from a recent coal ash spill into the Dan River, North Carolina, United States.
    Ku P; Tsui MT; Liu S; Corson KB; Williams AS; Monteverde MR; Woerndle GE; Hershey AE; Rublee PA
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2021 Jan; 208():111469. PubMed ID: 33091769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relative contributions of mercury bioavailability and microbial growth rate on net methylmercury production by anaerobic mixed cultures.
    Kucharzyk KH; Deshusses MA; Porter KA; Hsu-Kim H
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2015 Sep; 17(9):1568-77. PubMed ID: 26211614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence of Mercury Methylation and Demethylation by the Estuarine Microbial Communities Obtained in Stable Hg Isotope Studies.
    Figueiredo N; Serralheiro ML; Canário J; Duarte A; Hintelmann H; Carvalho C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Sep; 15(10):. PubMed ID: 30274240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Net methylmercury production in 2 contrasting stream sediments and associated accumulation and toxicity to periphyton.
    Klaus JE; Hammerschmidt CR; Costello DM; Burton GA
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Jul; 35(7):1759-65. PubMed ID: 26636557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High methylmercury production under ferruginous conditions in sediments impacted by sewage treatment plant discharges.
    Bravo AG; Bouchet S; Guédron S; Amouroux D; Dominik J; Zopfi J
    Water Res; 2015 Sep; 80():245-55. PubMed ID: 26005785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contribution of coexisting sulfate and iron reducing bacteria to methylmercury production in freshwater river sediments.
    Yu RQ; Flanders JR; Mack EE; Turner R; Mirza MB; Barkay T
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):2684-91. PubMed ID: 22148328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence of methylmercury production and modification of the microbial community structure in estuary sediments contaminated with wastewater treatment plant effluents.
    Ramond JB; Petit F; Quillet L; Ouddane B; Berthe T
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2011 May; 62(5):1073-80. PubMed ID: 21429530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of sulfate-reducing bacteria on methylmercury at the sediment-water interface.
    Zeng L; Luo G; He T; Guo Y; Qian X
    J Environ Sci (China); 2016 Aug; 46():214-9. PubMed ID: 27521953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methylmercury production in sediment from agricultural and non-agricultural wetlands in the Yolo Bypass, California, USA.
    Marvin-DiPasquale M; Windham-Myers L; Agee JL; Kakouros E; Kieu le H; Fleck JA; Alpers CN; Stricker CA
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jun; 484():288-99. PubMed ID: 24188689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methanogens and Iron-Reducing Bacteria: the Overlooked Members of Mercury-Methylating Microbial Communities in Boreal Lakes.
    Bravo AG; Peura S; Buck M; Ahmed O; Mateos-Rivera A; Herrero Ortega S; Schaefer JK; Bouchet S; Tolu J; Björn E; Bertilsson S
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 84(23):. PubMed ID: 30242005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marine mercury-methylating microbial communities from coastal to Capbreton Canyon sediments (North Atlantic Ocean).
    Azaroff A; Goñi Urriza M; Gassie C; Monperrus M; Guyoneaud R
    Environ Pollut; 2020 Jul; 262():114333. PubMed ID: 32443198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of sulfur-impregnated biochar amendment on microbial communities and mercury methylation in contaminated sediment.
    Bailon MX; Chaudhary DK; Jeon C; Ok YS; Hong Y
    J Hazard Mater; 2022 Sep; 438():129464. PubMed ID: 35999716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In-situ subaqueous capping of mercury-contaminated sediments in a fresh-water aquatic system, Part I-Bench-scale microcosm study to assess methylmercury production.
    Randall PM; Fimmen R; Lal V; Darlington R
    Environ Res; 2013 Aug; 125():30-40. PubMed ID: 23768845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of Nutrient Loading and Mercury Chemical Speciation on the Formation and Degradation of Methylmercury in Estuarine Sediment.
    Liem-Nguyen V; Jonsson S; Skyllberg U; Nilsson MB; Andersson A; Lundberg E; Björn E
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 50(13):6983-90. PubMed ID: 27258391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.