These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27723007)
1. Reproducibility and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement in healthy eyes using four different optical devices. Karadag R; Unluzeybek M; Cakici O; Kanra AY; Bayramlar H Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 37(4):1039-1045. PubMed ID: 27723007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using optical low-coherence reflectometry, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography, and Scheimpflug camera. Gonul S; Koktekir BE; Bakbak B; Gedik S Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2014; 77(6):345-50. PubMed ID: 25627178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Agreement and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurements by four different optical devices and an ultrasound pachymeter. Gokcinar NB; Yumusak E; Ornek N; Yorubulut S; Onaran Z Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Jul; 39(7):1589-1598. PubMed ID: 29984376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Central corneal thickness measurements with different imaging devices and ultrasound pachymetry. Tai LY; Khaw KW; Ng CM; Subrayan V Cornea; 2013 Jun; 32(6):766-71. PubMed ID: 23095499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement of central corneal thickness by high-resolution Scheimpflug imaging, Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry. Chen S; Huang J; Wen D; Chen W; Huang D; Wang Q Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Aug; 90(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 20560892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements Obtained by RTVue OCT, Lenstar, Sirius Topography, and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Healthy Subjects. Şimşek A; Bilak Ş; Güler M; Çapkin M; Bilgin B; Reyhan AH Semin Ophthalmol; 2016; 31(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 25412328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with a rotating scheimpflug camera, a specular microscope, optical low-coherence reflectometry, and ultrasound pachymetry in keratoconic eyes. Cinar Y; Cingu AK; Turkcu FM; Cinar T; Sahin A; Yuksel H; Ari S Semin Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 30(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 24171806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured by Standard Ultrasound Pachymetry, Corneal Topography, Tono-Pachymetry and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography. González-Pérez J; Queiruga Piñeiro J; Sánchez García Á; González Méijome JM Curr Eye Res; 2018 Jul; 43(7):866-872. PubMed ID: 29634372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repeatability and reproducibility of optical biometry implemented in a new optical coherence tomographer and comparison with a optical low-coherence reflectometer. Kanclerz P; Hoffer KJ; Rozema JJ; Przewłócka K; Savini G J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1619-1624. PubMed ID: 31706516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with standard ultrasonic pachymetry and optical devices. Doğan M; Ertan E Clin Exp Optom; 2019 Mar; 102(2):126-130. PubMed ID: 30557910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variability of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements-Comparing Zeiss IOL Master and Tomey Corneal Specular Microscope. Jiang JY; Ong K Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila); 2019; 8(4):275-279. PubMed ID: 31356366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Reproducibility of the measurement of central corneal thickness in healthy subjects obtained with the optical low coherence reflectometry pachymeter and comparison with the ultrasonic pachymetry]. Garza-Leon M; Plancarte-Lozano E; Valle-Penella AD; Guzmán-Martínez ML; Villarreal-González A Cir Cir; 2018; 86(1):50-55. PubMed ID: 29681640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by ultrasound pachymetry, corneal topography, spectral domain- optical coherence tomography, and non-contact specular microscopy. Ulutas HG; Ozkaya G; Amuk Hamidi N Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2023 Jun; 42():103527. PubMed ID: 36966866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using different imaging devices and ultrasound pachymetry. Can E; Eser-Ozturk H; Duran M; Cetinkaya T; Arıturk N Indian J Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 67(4):496-499. PubMed ID: 30900581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of central and peripheral corneal thickness measurements with scanning-slit, Scheimpflug and Fourier-domain ocular coherence tomography. Randleman JB; Lynn MJ; Perez-Straziota CE; Weissman HM; Kim SW Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Sep; 99(9):1176-81. PubMed ID: 25824260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Comparison between Scheimpflug imaging and optical coherence tomography in measuring corneal thickness. Huang J; Ding X; Savini G; Pan C; Feng Y; Cheng D; Hua Y; Hu X; Wang Q Ophthalmology; 2013 Oct; 120(10):1951-8. PubMed ID: 23672973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative study of central corneal thickness measurement with slit-lamp optical coherence tomography and visante optical coherence tomography. Li H; Leung CK; Wong L; Cheung CY; Pang CP; Weinreb RN; Lam DS Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):796-801.e2. PubMed ID: 17916376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements Using Ultrasonic Pachymetry, Anterior Segment OCT and Noncontact Specular Microscopy. Scotto R; Bagnis A; Papadia M; Cutolo CA; Risso D; Traverso CE J Glaucoma; 2017 Oct; 26(10):860-865. PubMed ID: 28834824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]