These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27723601)

  • 41. Computing a smallest multilabeled phylogenetic tree from rooted triplets.
    Guillemot S; Jansson J; Sung WK
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2011; 8(4):1141-7. PubMed ID: 20733243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Orchard Networks are Trees with Additional Horizontal Arcs.
    van Iersel L; Janssen R; Jones M; Murakami Y
    Bull Math Biol; 2022 Jun; 84(8):76. PubMed ID: 35727410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Generation of Level- k LGT Networks.
    Pons JC; Scornavacca C; Cardona G
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2020; 17(1):158-164. PubMed ID: 30703035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Generation of Binary Tree-Child phylogenetic networks.
    Cardona G; Pons JC; Scornavacca C
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Sep; 15(9):e1007347. PubMed ID: 31509525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Ranking Top- k Trees in Tree-Based Phylogenetic Networks.
    Hayamizu M; Makino K
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2023; 20(3):2349-2355. PubMed ID: 37015415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Reconstructing phylogenetic networks using maximum parsimony.
    Nakhleh L; Jin G; Zhao F; Mellor-Crummey J
    Proc IEEE Comput Syst Bioinform Conf; 2005; ():93-102. PubMed ID: 16447967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Inferring phylogenetic relationships avoiding forbidden rooted triplets.
    He YJ; Huynh TN; Jansson J; Sung WK
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2006 Feb; 4(1):59-74. PubMed ID: 16568542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A program for verification of phylogenetic network models.
    Gunawan AD; Lu B; Zhang L
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Sep; 32(17):i503-i510. PubMed ID: 27587668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Spaces of phylogenetic networks from generalized nearest-neighbor interchange operations.
    Huber KT; Linz S; Moulton V; Wu T
    J Math Biol; 2016 Feb; 72(3):699-725. PubMed ID: 26037483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Tanglegrams for rooted phylogenetic trees and networks.
    Scornavacca C; Zickmann F; Huson DH
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Jul; 27(13):i248-56. PubMed ID: 21685078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Classes of explicit phylogenetic networks and their biological and mathematical significance.
    Kong S; Pons JC; Kubatko L; Wicke K
    J Math Biol; 2022 May; 84(6):47. PubMed ID: 35503141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Bayesian inference of phylogenetic networks from bi-allelic genetic markers.
    Zhu J; Wen D; Yu Y; Meudt HM; Nakhleh L
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Jan; 14(1):e1005932. PubMed ID: 29320496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. On Determining if Tree-based Networks Contain Fixed Trees.
    Anaya M; Anipchenko-Ulaj O; Ashfaq A; Chiu J; Kaiser M; Ohsawa MS; Owen M; Pavlechko E; St John K; Suleria S; Thompson K; Yap C
    Bull Math Biol; 2016 May; 78(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 27125655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Reconstruction of biogeographic and evolutionary networks using reticulograms.
    Legendre P; Makarenkov V
    Syst Biol; 2002 Apr; 51(2):199-216. PubMed ID: 12028728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Coalescent Histories for Lodgepole Species Trees.
    Disanto F; Rosenberg NA
    J Comput Biol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):918-29. PubMed ID: 25973633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Reconstructing Tree-Child Networks from Reticulate-Edge-Deleted Subnetworks.
    Murakami Y; van Iersel L; Janssen R; Jones M; Moulton V
    Bull Math Biol; 2019 Oct; 81(10):3823-3863. PubMed ID: 31297691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Uniqueness, intractability and exact algorithms: reflections on level-k phylogenetic networks.
    Van Iersel L; Kelk S; Mnich M
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2009 Aug; 7(4):597-623. PubMed ID: 19634194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Finding a most parsimonious or likely tree in a network with respect to an alignment.
    Kelk S; Pardi F; Scornavacca C; van Iersel L
    J Math Biol; 2019 Jan; 78(1-2):527-547. PubMed ID: 30121824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of galled trees.
    Cardona G; Llabrés M; Rosselló F; Valiente G
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2011; 8(2):410-27. PubMed ID: 20660951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Bayesian coestimation of phylogeny and sequence alignment.
    Lunter G; Miklós I; Drummond A; Jensen JL; Hein J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():83. PubMed ID: 15804354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.