These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27725292)

  • 1. Development of a cognitive framework of patient record summary review in the formative phase of user-centered design.
    Horsky J; Ramelson HZ
    J Biomed Inform; 2016 Dec; 64():147-157. PubMed ID: 27725292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electronic health record usability: analysis of the user-centered design processes of eleven electronic health record vendors.
    Ratwani RM; Fairbanks RJ; Hettinger AZ; Benda NC
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Nov; 22(6):1179-82. PubMed ID: 26049532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A framework for evaluating electronic health record vendor user-centered design and usability testing processes.
    Ratwani RM; Zachary Hettinger A; Kosydar A; Fairbanks RJ; Hodgkins ML
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 Apr; 24(e1):e35-e39. PubMed ID: 27375292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Barriers to comparing the usability of electronic health records.
    Ratwani RM; Hettinger AZ; Fairbanks RJ
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 Apr; 24(e1):e191-e193. PubMed ID: 27572813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Better Bridges, Better Systems.
    Berlin J
    Tex Med; 2015 Sep; 111(9):39-43. PubMed ID: 26360338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health IT Usability Focus Section: Data Use and Navigation Patterns among Medical ICU Clinicians during Electronic Chart Review.
    Nolan ME; Siwani R; Helmi H; Pickering BW; Moreno-Franco P; Herasevich V
    Appl Clin Inform; 2017 Oct; 8(4):1117-1126. PubMed ID: 29241249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrating data from an online diabetes prevention program into an electronic health record and clinical workflow, a design phase usability study.
    Mishuris RG; Yoder J; Wilson D; Mann D
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Jul; 16():88. PubMed ID: 27401606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Usability Evaluation of Electronic Health Record System around Clinical Notes Usage-An Ethnographic Study.
    Rizvi RF; Marquard JL; Hultman GM; Adam TJ; Harder KA; Melton GB
    Appl Clin Inform; 2017 Oct; 8(4):1095-1105. PubMed ID: 29241247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adequate number of clinicians on usability tests lacking, says study.
    ED Manag; 2015 Dec; 27(12):137-41. PubMed ID: 26677480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dynamic Electronic Health Record Note Prototype: Seeing More by Showing Less.
    Belden JL; Koopman RJ; Patil SJ; Lowrance NJ; Petroski GF; Smith JB
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2017; 30(6):691-700. PubMed ID: 29180544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Applying User-Centered Design and Implementation Science to the Early-Stage Development of a Telehealth-Enhanced Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation Program: Quality Improvement Study.
    Duran AT; Keener-DeNoia A; Stavrolakes K; Fraser A; Blanco LV; Fleisch E; Pieszchata N; Cannone D; Keys McKay C; Whittman E; Edmondson D; Shelton RC; Moise N
    JMIR Form Res; 2023 Jul; 7():e47264. PubMed ID: 37440285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The clinician in the driver's seat: part 2 - intelligent uses of space in a drag/drop user-composable electronic health record.
    Senathirajah Y; Kaufman D; Bakken S
    J Biomed Inform; 2014 Dec; 52():177-88. PubMed ID: 25445921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A study of user requests regarding the fully electronic health record system at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital: challenges for future electronic health record systems.
    Yoo S; Kim S; Lee S; Lee KH; Baek RM; Hwang H
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 May; 82(5):387-97. PubMed ID: 22959193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Usability Evaluation of an EHR's Clinical Notes Interface from the Perspective of Attending and Resident Physicians: An Exploratory Study.
    Rizvi RF; Marquard JL; Seywerd MA; Adam TJ; Elison JT; Hultman GM; Harder KA; Melton GB
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 245():1128-1132. PubMed ID: 29295278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Usability Testing of Two Ambulatory EHR Navigators.
    Hultman G; Marquard J; Arsoniadis E; Mink P; Rizvi R; Ramer T; Khairat S; Fickau K; Melton GB
    Appl Clin Inform; 2016; 7(2):502-15. PubMed ID: 27437057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ten factors to consider when developing usability scenarios and tasks for health information technology.
    Russ AL; Saleem JJ
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Feb; 78():123-133. PubMed ID: 29329702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Navigation in the electronic health record: A review of the safety and usability literature.
    Roman LC; Ancker JS; Johnson SB; Senathirajah Y
    J Biomed Inform; 2017 Mar; 67():69-79. PubMed ID: 28088527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Usability and Safety in Electronic Medical Records Interface Design: A Review of Recent Literature and Guideline Formulation.
    Zahabi M; Kaber DB; Swangnetr M
    Hum Factors; 2015 Aug; 57(5):805-34. PubMed ID: 25850118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advancing electronic health record vendor usability maturity: Progress and next steps.
    Hettinger AZ; Melnick ER; Ratwani RM
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2021 Apr; 28(5):1029-1031. PubMed ID: 33517394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In Search of Vital Signs: A Comparative Study of EHR Documentation.
    Duncan BJ; Zheng L; Furniss SK; Solomon AJ; Doebbeling BN; Grando G; Burton MM; Poterack KA; Miksch TA; Helmers RA; Kaufman DR
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2018; 2018():1233-1242. PubMed ID: 30815165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.