BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

476 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27725474)

  • 1. The 2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence.
    Kato A; Nakamura K; Hiyama Y
    Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci; 2016; 92(8):358-371. PubMed ID: 27725474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Pawnee earthquake as a result of the interplay among injection, faults and foreshocks.
    Chen X; Nakata N; Pennington C; Haffener J; Chang JC; He X; Zhan Z; Ni S; Walter JI
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):4945. PubMed ID: 28694472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Structural features and seismotectonic implications of coseismic surface ruptures produced by the 2016
    Lin A
    J Seismol; 2017; 21(5):1079-1100. PubMed ID: 28867959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. En échelon and orthogonal fault ruptures of the 11 April 2012 great intraplate earthquakes.
    Yue H; Lay T; Koper KD
    Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7419):245-9. PubMed ID: 23023129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subduction intraslab-interface fault interactions in the 2022
    Shelly DR; Goldberg DE; Materna KZ; Skoumal RJ; Hardebeck JL; Yoon CE; Yeck WL; Earle PS
    Sci Adv; 2024 Mar; 10(10):eadl1226. PubMed ID: 38446891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Earthquakes as beacons of stress change.
    Seeber L; Armbruster JG
    Nature; 2000 Sep; 407(6800):69-72. PubMed ID: 10993073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hierarchical interlocked orthogonal faulting in the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence.
    Ross ZE; Idini B; Jia Z; Stephenson OL; Zhong M; Wang X; Zhan Z; Simons M; Fielding EJ; Yun SH; Hauksson E; Moore AW; Liu Z; Jung J
    Science; 2019 Oct; 366(6463):346-351. PubMed ID: 31624209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implications of fault constitutive properties for earthquake prediction.
    Dieterich JH; Kilgore B
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1996 Apr; 93(9):3787-94. PubMed ID: 11607666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Foreshock sequences and short-term earthquake predictability on East Pacific Rise transform faults.
    McGuire JJ; Boettcher MS; Jordan TH
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7032):457-61. PubMed ID: 15791246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship of preseismic, coseismic, and postseismic fault ruptures of two large interplate aftershocks of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake with slow-earthquake activity.
    Kubo H; Nishikawa T
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):12044. PubMed ID: 32694554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The LVD signals during the early-mid stages of the L'Aquila seismic sequence and the radon signature of some aftershocks of moderate magnitude.
    Cigolini C; Laiolo M; Coppola D
    J Environ Radioact; 2015 Jan; 139():56-65. PubMed ID: 25464041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short-Term Foreshocks as Key Information for Mainshock Timing and Rupture: The M
    Papadopoulos GA; Agalos A; Minadakis G; Triantafyllou I; Krassakis P
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Oct; 20(19):. PubMed ID: 33028009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysing the 1811-1812 New Madrid earthquakes with recent instrumentally recorded aftershocks.
    Mueller K; Hough SE; Bilham R
    Nature; 2004 May; 429(6989):284-8. PubMed ID: 15152249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recurrent large earthquakes related with an active fault-volcano system, southwest Japan.
    Lin A; Chen P; Sado K
    Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):14081. PubMed ID: 30237534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Seismicity remotely triggered by the magnitude 7.3 landers, california, earthquake.
    Hill DP; Reasenberg PA; Michael A; Arabaz WJ; Beroza G; Brumbaugh D; Brune JN; Castro R; Davis S; Depolo D; Ellsworth WL; Gomberg J; Harmsen S; House L; Jackson SM; Johnston MJ; Jones L; Keller R; Malone S; Munguia L; Nava S; Pechmann JC; Sanford A; Simpson RW; Smith RB; Stark M; Stickney M; Vidal A; Walter S; Wong V; Zollweg J
    Science; 1993 Jun; 260(5114):1617-23. PubMed ID: 17810202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Irregular rupture process of the 2022 Taitung, Taiwan, earthquake sequence.
    Yagi Y; Okuwaki R; Enescu B; Lu J
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):1107. PubMed ID: 36670137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The source parameters, surface deformation and tectonic setting of three recent earthquakes: thessalonki (Greece), tabas-e-golshan (iran) and carlisle (u.k.).
    King G; Soufleris C; Berberian M
    Disasters; 1981 Mar; 5(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 20958479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coseismic fault-slip distribution of the 2019 Ridgecrest Mw6.4 and Mw7.1 earthquakes.
    Gao Y; Duan H; Zhang Y; Chen J; Jian H; Wu R; Yin W
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):14188. PubMed ID: 34244533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tectonic Implication of the 2022
    Yin X; Zhai H; Cai R; Qiu J; Zou X
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Feb; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 36850725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Potential for a large earthquake near Los Angeles inferred from the 2014 La Habra earthquake.
    Donnellan A; Grant Ludwig L; Parker JW; Rundle JB; Wang J; Pierce M; Blewitt G; Hensley S
    Earth Space Sci; 2015 Sep; 2(9):378-385. PubMed ID: 27981074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.