These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

476 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27725474)

  • 1. The 2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence.
    Kato A; Nakamura K; Hiyama Y
    Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci; 2016; 92(8):358-371. PubMed ID: 27725474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Pawnee earthquake as a result of the interplay among injection, faults and foreshocks.
    Chen X; Nakata N; Pennington C; Haffener J; Chang JC; He X; Zhan Z; Ni S; Walter JI
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):4945. PubMed ID: 28694472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Structural features and seismotectonic implications of coseismic surface ruptures produced by the 2016
    Lin A
    J Seismol; 2017; 21(5):1079-1100. PubMed ID: 28867959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. En échelon and orthogonal fault ruptures of the 11 April 2012 great intraplate earthquakes.
    Yue H; Lay T; Koper KD
    Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7419):245-9. PubMed ID: 23023129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subduction intraslab-interface fault interactions in the 2022
    Shelly DR; Goldberg DE; Materna KZ; Skoumal RJ; Hardebeck JL; Yoon CE; Yeck WL; Earle PS
    Sci Adv; 2024 Mar; 10(10):eadl1226. PubMed ID: 38446891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Earthquakes as beacons of stress change.
    Seeber L; Armbruster JG
    Nature; 2000 Sep; 407(6800):69-72. PubMed ID: 10993073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hierarchical interlocked orthogonal faulting in the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence.
    Ross ZE; Idini B; Jia Z; Stephenson OL; Zhong M; Wang X; Zhan Z; Simons M; Fielding EJ; Yun SH; Hauksson E; Moore AW; Liu Z; Jung J
    Science; 2019 Oct; 366(6463):346-351. PubMed ID: 31624209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implications of fault constitutive properties for earthquake prediction.
    Dieterich JH; Kilgore B
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1996 Apr; 93(9):3787-94. PubMed ID: 11607666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Foreshock sequences and short-term earthquake predictability on East Pacific Rise transform faults.
    McGuire JJ; Boettcher MS; Jordan TH
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7032):457-61. PubMed ID: 15791246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship of preseismic, coseismic, and postseismic fault ruptures of two large interplate aftershocks of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake with slow-earthquake activity.
    Kubo H; Nishikawa T
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):12044. PubMed ID: 32694554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The LVD signals during the early-mid stages of the L'Aquila seismic sequence and the radon signature of some aftershocks of moderate magnitude.
    Cigolini C; Laiolo M; Coppola D
    J Environ Radioact; 2015 Jan; 139():56-65. PubMed ID: 25464041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short-Term Foreshocks as Key Information for Mainshock Timing and Rupture: The M
    Papadopoulos GA; Agalos A; Minadakis G; Triantafyllou I; Krassakis P
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Oct; 20(19):. PubMed ID: 33028009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysing the 1811-1812 New Madrid earthquakes with recent instrumentally recorded aftershocks.
    Mueller K; Hough SE; Bilham R
    Nature; 2004 May; 429(6989):284-8. PubMed ID: 15152249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recurrent large earthquakes related with an active fault-volcano system, southwest Japan.
    Lin A; Chen P; Sado K
    Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):14081. PubMed ID: 30237534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Seismicity remotely triggered by the magnitude 7.3 landers, california, earthquake.
    Hill DP; Reasenberg PA; Michael A; Arabaz WJ; Beroza G; Brumbaugh D; Brune JN; Castro R; Davis S; Depolo D; Ellsworth WL; Gomberg J; Harmsen S; House L; Jackson SM; Johnston MJ; Jones L; Keller R; Malone S; Munguia L; Nava S; Pechmann JC; Sanford A; Simpson RW; Smith RB; Stark M; Stickney M; Vidal A; Walter S; Wong V; Zollweg J
    Science; 1993 Jun; 260(5114):1617-23. PubMed ID: 17810202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Irregular rupture process of the 2022 Taitung, Taiwan, earthquake sequence.
    Yagi Y; Okuwaki R; Enescu B; Lu J
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):1107. PubMed ID: 36670137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The source parameters, surface deformation and tectonic setting of three recent earthquakes: thessalonki (Greece), tabas-e-golshan (iran) and carlisle (u.k.).
    King G; Soufleris C; Berberian M
    Disasters; 1981 Mar; 5(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 20958479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coseismic fault-slip distribution of the 2019 Ridgecrest Mw6.4 and Mw7.1 earthquakes.
    Gao Y; Duan H; Zhang Y; Chen J; Jian H; Wu R; Yin W
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):14188. PubMed ID: 34244533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tectonic Implication of the 2022
    Yin X; Zhai H; Cai R; Qiu J; Zou X
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Feb; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 36850725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Potential for a large earthquake near Los Angeles inferred from the 2014 La Habra earthquake.
    Donnellan A; Grant Ludwig L; Parker JW; Rundle JB; Wang J; Pierce M; Blewitt G; Hensley S
    Earth Space Sci; 2015 Sep; 2(9):378-385. PubMed ID: 27981074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.