BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

503 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27725649)

  • 1. Defining Benchmarks for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenomas Per Colonoscopy in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy Due to a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test.
    Hilsden RJ; Bridges R; Dube C; McGregor SE; Naugler C; Rose SM; Rostom A; Heitman SJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2016 Dec; 111(12):1743-1749. PubMed ID: 27725649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Defining and Applying Locally Relevant Benchmarks for the Adenoma Detection Rate.
    Hilsden RJ; Rose SM; Dube C; Rostom A; Bridges R; McGregor SE; Brenner DR; Heitman SJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2019 Aug; 114(8):1315-1321. PubMed ID: 30848731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adenoma detection rates in colonoscopies for positive fecal immunochemical tests versus direct screening colonoscopies.
    Wong JCT; Chiu HM; Kim HS; Byeon JS; Matsuda T; Kobayashi N; Wu DC; Ong DE; Sung JJY;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):607-613.e1. PubMed ID: 30452915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adenoma Detection Rate in Asymptomatic Patients with Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests.
    Kligman E; Li W; Eckert GJ; Kahi C
    Dig Dis Sci; 2018 May; 63(5):1167-1172. PubMed ID: 29468377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Defining adenoma detection rate benchmarks in average-risk male veterans.
    El-Halabi MM; Rex DK; Saito A; Eckert GJ; Kahi CJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Jan; 89(1):137-143. PubMed ID: 30144416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death.
    Kaminski MF; Wieszczy P; Rupinski M; Wojciechowska U; Didkowska J; Kraszewska E; Kobiela J; Franczyk R; Rupinska M; Kocot B; Chaber-Ciopinska A; Pachlewski J; Polkowski M; Regula J
    Gastroenterology; 2017 Jul; 153(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 28428142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of adenomas per colonoscopy and adenomas per positive participant as new quality parameters in screening colonoscopy.
    Gessl I; Waldmann E; Penz D; Majcher B; Dokladanska A; Hinterberger A; Szymanska A; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Ferlitsch M
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):496-502. PubMed ID: 30138613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adenoma Detection Rate and Risk for Interval Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer in Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Screening : A Population-Based Cohort Study.
    Wisse PHA; Erler NS; de Boer SY; den Hartog B; Oudkerk Pool M; Terhaar Sive Droste JS; Verveer C; Meijer GA; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Spaander MCW
    Ann Intern Med; 2022 Oct; 175(10):1366-1373. PubMed ID: 36162114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving measurement of the adenoma detection rate and adenoma per colonoscopy quality metric: the Indiana University experience.
    Kahi CJ; Vemulapalli KC; Johnson CS; Rex DK
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Mar; 79(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 24246797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adenoma Detection Rate and Colorectal Cancer Risk in Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening Programs : An Observational Cohort Study.
    Zorzi M; Antonelli G; Barbiellini Amidei C; Battagello J; Germanà B; Valiante F; Benvenuti S; Tringali A; Bortoluzzi F; Cervellin E; Giacomin D; Meggiato T; Rosa-Rizzotto E; Fregonese D; Dinca M; Baldassarre G; Scalon P; Pantalena M; Milan L; Bulighin G; Di Piramo D; Azzurro M; Gabbrielli A; Repici A; Rex DK; Rugge M; Hassan C; ; Giacomin A; Buda A; Costa D; Checchin D; Marin R; Patarnello E; Ceriani A; Guido E; Bertomoro P; Merlini N; Murer F; Ntakirutimana E; Benazzato L; Bellocchi MCC
    Ann Intern Med; 2023 Mar; 176(3):303-310. PubMed ID: 36802754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of a computer-aided detection system in a fecal immunochemical test-based organized colorectal cancer screening program: a randomized controlled trial (AIFIT study).
    Rondonotti E; Di Paolo D; Rizzotto ER; Alvisi C; Buscarini E; Spadaccini M; Tamanini G; Paggi S; Amato A; Scardino G; Romeo S; Alicante S; Ancona F; Guido E; Marzo V; Chicco F; Agazzi S; Rosa C; Correale L; Repici A; Hassan C; Radaelli F;
    Endoscopy; 2022 Dec; 54(12):1171-1179. PubMed ID: 35545122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adenoma detection rate in high-risk patients differs from that in average-risk patients.
    Sanaka MR; Rai T; Navaneethan U; Gohel TD; Podugu A; Thota PN; Lopez R; Kiran RP; Burke CA
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jan; 83(1):172-8. PubMed ID: 26024584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).
    Zorzi M; Senore C; Da Re F; Barca A; Bonelli LA; Cannizzaro R; Fasoli R; Di Furia L; Di Giulio E; Mantellini P; Naldoni C; Sassatelli R; Rex D; Hassan C; Zappa M;
    Gut; 2015 Sep; 64(9):1389-96. PubMed ID: 25227521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of adenoma detection rate and adenoma per colonoscopy as a quality indicator of colonoscopy.
    Park SK; Kim HY; Lee CK; Cha JM; Eun CS; Han DS; Lee BI; Shin JE; Park DI
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Jul; 51(7):886-90. PubMed ID: 27001284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Proposal of high-risk adenoma detection rate as an impactful, complementary quality indicator of colonoscopy.
    Wadhwa V; Jobanputra Y; Al Taii H; Thota PN; Lopez R; Gurudu SR; Sanaka MR
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Jan; 34(1):325-331. PubMed ID: 30927122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The mean number of adenomas per procedure should become the gold standard to measure the neoplasia yield of colonoscopy: a population-based cohort study.
    Denis B; Sauleau EA; Gendre I; Exbrayat C; Piette C; Dancourt V; Foll Y; Ait Hadad H; Bailly L; Perrin P
    Dig Liver Dis; 2014 Feb; 46(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 24054769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing.
    Gawron AJ; Thompson WK; Keswani RN; Rasmussen LV; Kho AN
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 109(12):1844-9. PubMed ID: 24935271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Faecal haemoglobin concentration influences risk prediction of interval cancers resulting from inadequate colonoscopy quality: analysis of the Taiwanese Nationwide Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.
    Chiu SY; Chuang SL; Chen SL; Yen AM; Fann JC; Chang DC; Lee YC; Wu MS; Chou CK; Hsu WF; Chiou ST; Chiu HM
    Gut; 2017 Feb; 66(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 26515543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adenoma detection by Endocuff-assisted versus standard colonoscopy in an organized screening program: the "ItaVision" randomized controlled trial.
    Zorzi M; Hassan C; Battagello J; Antonelli G; Pantalena M; Bulighin G; Alicante S; Meggiato T; Rosa-Rizzotto E; Iacopini F; Luigiano C; Monica F; Arrigoni A; Germanà B; Valiante F; Mallardi B; Senore C; Grazzini G; Mantellini P;
    Endoscopy; 2022 Feb; 54(2):138-147. PubMed ID: 33524994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.