160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27725808)
1. The Responsiveness of the Lucerne ICF-Based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale: A Comparison with the Functional Independence Measure and the Barthel Index.
Vanbellingen T; Ottiger B; Pflugshaupt T; Mehrholz J; Bohlhalter S; Nef T; Nyffeler T
Front Neurol; 2016; 7():152. PubMed ID: 27725808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comprehensive ADL Outcome Measurement after Stroke: Rasch Validation of the Lucerne ICF-Based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale (LIMOS).
Van de Winckel A; Ottiger B; Bohlhalter S; Nyffeler T; Vanbellingen T
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2019 Dec; 100(12):2314-2323. PubMed ID: 30928303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and Validation of the Short-LIMOS for the Acute Stroke Unit-A Short Version of the Lucerne ICF-Based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale.
Ottiger B; Vanbellingen T; Cazzoli D; Nyffeler T; Veerbeek JM
Front Rehabil Sci; 2022; 3():857955. PubMed ID: 36189034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the new Lucerne ICF based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale (LIMOS) for stroke patients.
Ottiger B; Vanbellingen T; Gabriel C; Huberle E; Koenig-Bruhin M; Pflugshaupt T; Bohlhalter S; Nyffeler T
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130925. PubMed ID: 26110769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel index and the Functional Independence Measure.
van der Putten JJ; Hobart JC; Freeman JA; Thompson AJ
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1999 Apr; 66(4):480-4. PubMed ID: 10201420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the psychometric characteristics of the functional independence measure, 5 item Barthel index, and 10 item Barthel index in patients with stroke.
Hsueh IP; Lin JH; Jeng JS; Hsieh CL
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2002 Aug; 73(2):188-90. PubMed ID: 12122181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rasch validation of a new scale to measure dependency in arm use in daily life: the Upper Limb Lucerne ICF-based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale.
Van de Winckel A; Ottiger B; Veerbeek JM; Nyffeler T; Vanbellingen T
Front Neurol; 2023; 14():1154322. PubMed ID: 37492854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characteristics of the Functional Independence Measure in traumatic spinal cord injury.
Hall KM; Cohen ME; Wright J; Call M; Werner P
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1999 Nov; 80(11):1471-6. PubMed ID: 10569443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Responsiveness of functional health status measures frequently used in stroke research.
Schepers VP; Ketelaar M; Visser-Meily JM; Dekker J; Lindeman E
Disabil Rehabil; 2006 Sep; 28(17):1035-40. PubMed ID: 16950733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can I Discharge My Stroke Patient Home After Inpatient Neurorehabilitation? LIMOS Cut-Off Scores for Stroke Patients "
Ottiger B; Lehnick D; Pflugshaupt T; Vanbellingen T; Nyffeler T
Front Neurol; 2020; 11():601725. PubMed ID: 33329360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Responsiveness of the ten-metre walk test, Step Test and Motor Assessment Scale in inpatient care after stroke.
Scrivener K; Schurr K; Sherrington C
BMC Neurol; 2014 Jun; 14():129. PubMed ID: 24934859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting Motor and Cognitive Improvement Through Machine Learning Algorithm in Human Subject that Underwent a Rehabilitation Treatment in the Early Stage of Stroke.
Sale P; Ferriero G; Ciabattoni L; Cortese AM; Ferracuti F; Romeo L; Piccione F; Masiero S
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2018 Nov; 27(11):2962-2972. PubMed ID: 30077601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure during early inpatient rehabilitation after single incident brain injury.
Houlden H; Edwards M; McNeil J; Greenwood R
Clin Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 20(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 16541936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and validation of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Clinical Rehabilitation (USER).
Post MW; van de Port IG; Kap B; Berdenis van Berlekom SH
Clin Rehabil; 2009 Oct; 23(10):909-17. PubMed ID: 19717505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the FIM + FAM in patients with cerebrovascular accident.
Miki E; Yamane S; Yamaoka M; Fujii H; Ueno H; Kawahara T; Tanaka K; Tamashiro H; Inoue E; Okamoto T; Kuriyama M
Scand J Occup Ther; 2016 Sep; 23(5):398-404. PubMed ID: 26463478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitivity to changes in disability after stroke: a comparison of four scales useful in clinical trials.
Dromerick AW; Edwards DF; Diringer MN
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2003; 40(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15150715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing the responsiveness of the assessment of motor and process skills and the functional independence measure.
Fioravanti AM; Bordignon CM; Pettit SM; Woodhouse LJ; Ansley BJ
Can J Occup Ther; 2012 Jun; 79(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 22822694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Self-rating Barthel index compatible with the original Barthel index and the Functional Independence Measure motor score.
Hachisuka K; Okazaki T; Ogata H
J UOEH; 1997 Jun; 19(2):107-21. PubMed ID: 9194213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ratings of physical function obtained by interview are legitimate for patients hospitalized after stroke.
Sadaria KS; Bohannon RW; Lee N; Maljanian R
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2001; 10(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 17903804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cross-cultural validation of the Persian version of the Functional Independence Measure for patients with stroke.
Naghdi S; Ansari NN; Raji P; Shamili A; Amini M; Hasson S
Disabil Rehabil; 2016; 38(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 25885666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]