277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27726240)
1. Cost-effectiveness analysis of multiparametric MRI with increased active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer in Australia.
Gordon LG; James R; Tuffaha HW; Lowe A; Yaxley J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 May; 45(5):1304-1315. PubMed ID: 27726240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance for Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer: A Cost-effectiveness Modeling Study.
Patel S; Rongen JJ; Fütterer JJ; Boltyenkov A; Rovers MM
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Dec; 1(6):476-483. PubMed ID: 31158091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimising the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in the Era of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis Based on the Prostate MR Imaging Study (PROMIS).
Faria R; Soares MO; Spackman E; Ahmed HU; Brown LC; Kaplan R; Emberton M; Sculpher MJ
Eur Urol; 2018 Jan; 73(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 28935163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR-guided targeted biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer: a modelling study from a health care perspective.
de Rooij M; Crienen S; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO; Rovers MM; Grutters JP
Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 24377803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical Utility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging as the First-line Tool for Men with High Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
Panebianco V; Valerio MC; Giuliani A; Pecoraro M; Ceravolo I; Barchetti G; Catalano C; Padhani AR
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Aug; 1(3):208-214. PubMed ID: 31102623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6.
Barnett CL; Davenport MS; Montgomery JS; Kunju LP; Denton BT; Piert M
J Nucl Med; 2019 Dec; 60(12):1705-1712. PubMed ID: 31350321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Active Surveillance Strategies for Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer.
Sathianathen NJ; Konety BR; Alarid-Escudero F; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM; Kuntz KM
Eur Urol; 2019 Jun; 75(6):910-917. PubMed ID: 30425010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating the healthcare costs of treating prostate cancer in Australia: A Markov modelling analysis.
Gordon LG; Tuffaha HW; James R; Keller AT; Lowe A; Scuffham PA; Gardiner RA
Urol Oncol; 2018 Mar; 36(3):91.e7-91.e15. PubMed ID: 29169847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of Multiparametric MRI in 800 Men Submitted to Repeat Prostate Biopsy: Results of a Public Health Model.
Pepe P; Pepe G; Pepe L; Garufi A; Priolo GD; Pennisi M
Anticancer Res; 2018 Apr; 38(4):2395-2398. PubMed ID: 29599367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and MRI-guided biopsy in a population-based prostate cancer screening setting using a micro-simulation model.
Getaneh AM; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
Cancer Med; 2021 Jun; 10(12):4046-4053. PubMed ID: 33991077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer.
An JY; Sidana A; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Türkbey İB
Balkan Med J; 2017 Sep; 34(5):388-396. PubMed ID: 28990929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer.
Cerantola Y; Dragomir A; Tanguay S; Bladou F; Aprikian A; Kassouf W
Urol Oncol; 2016 Mar; 34(3):119.e1-9. PubMed ID: 26602178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benefit, Harm, and Cost-effectiveness Associated With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Before Biopsy in Age-based and Risk-stratified Screening for Prostate Cancer.
Callender T; Emberton M; Morris S; Pharoah PDP; Pashayan N
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Mar; 4(3):e2037657. PubMed ID: 33704474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Cost-Utility Analysis of Prostate Cancer Screening in Australia.
Keller A; Gericke C; Whitty JA; Yaxley J; Kua B; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2017 Feb; 15(1):95-111. PubMed ID: 27757918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical utility and cost modelling of the phi test to triage referrals into image-based diagnostic services for suspected prostate cancer: the PRIM (Phi to RefIne Mri) study.
Kim L; Boxall N; George A; Burling K; Acher P; Aning J; McCracken S; Page T; Gnanapragasam VJ
BMC Med; 2020 Apr; 18(1):95. PubMed ID: 32299423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of MRI in active surveillance for men with localized prostate cancer.
Recabal P; Ehdaie B
Curr Opin Urol; 2015 Nov; 25(6):504-9. PubMed ID: 26372037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using multiparametric MRI to 'personalize' biopsy for men.
Mendhiratta N; Meng X; Taneja SS
Curr Opin Urol; 2015 Nov; 25(6):498-503. PubMed ID: 26414608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of MR Imaging-guided Strategies for Detection of Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men.
Pahwa S; Schiltz NK; Ponsky LE; Lu Z; Griswold MA; Gulani V
Radiology; 2017 Oct; 285(1):157-166. PubMed ID: 28514203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Decision analysis model comparing cost of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging vs. repeat biopsy for detection of prostate cancer in men with prior negative findings on biopsy.
Lotan Y; Haddad AQ; Costa DN; Pedrosa I; Rofsky NM; Roehrborn CG
Urol Oncol; 2015 Jun; 33(6):266.e9-16. PubMed ID: 25858102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer-a comparative study including radical prostatectomy specimens.
Toner L; Papa N; Perera M; Katelaris N; Weerakoon M; Chin K; Harewood L; Bolton DM; Lawrentschuk N
World J Urol; 2017 Jun; 35(6):935-941. PubMed ID: 27785560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
