These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27726842)

  • 1. [Facial profile preferences: a cross-sectional survey].
    Hélou ME; Kassis A; Haddad R; Ghoubril J
    Orthod Fr; 2016 Sep; 87(3):341-346. PubMed ID: 27726842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative assessment of the perception of Chinese facial profile esthetics.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):692-9. PubMed ID: 15953894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An Asian community's perspective on facial profile attractiveness.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 35(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17244134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationships between facial features in the perception of profile attractiveness.
    Torsello F; Graci M; Grande NM; Deli R
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 20974445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, general dentists, and laypersons for Indian facial profiles: A cross-sectional study.
    Reddy H; Singla R; Singla N; Natarajan M; Singhal DK
    F1000Res; 2023; 12():953. PubMed ID: 39372260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Facial profile esthetic preferences: perception in two Brazilian states.
    Oliveira MD; Silveira BL; Mattos CT; Marquezan M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):88-95. PubMed ID: 26154461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
    Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of a brown subject displaying different degrees of lip projection or retrusion, in the city of Salvador/Bahia.
    Carneiro EN; Pithon MM; Machado AW; Braga E
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(2):62-67. PubMed ID: 29898159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Antero-Posterior Lip Position in Most Favored Facial Profile of Jaipur Population.
    Sharma K; Trehan M; Singh S; Mahlawat H; Kenkare P; Jayavarma S A
    Cureus; 2022 Aug; 14(8):e27774. PubMed ID: 36106287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, oral surgeons, and laypersons for Persian facial profiles.
    Imani MM; Sanei E; Niaki EA; Shahroudi AS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Sep; 154(3):412-420. PubMed ID: 30173845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery.
    Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preferences of AP position of the straight Caucasian facial profile.
    Mees S; Jiménez Bellinga R; Mommaerts MY; De Pauw GA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 41(8):755-63. PubMed ID: 23453133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Facial profile preference among four panels].
    Wang Y; Liao ZY; Lai WL; Yang Z; Zhao ZH
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 43(8):468-71. PubMed ID: 19087585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in facial profile and dental esthetic perceptions between young adults and orthodontists.
    Yin L; Jiang M; Chen W; Smales RJ; Wang Q; Tang L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):750-6. PubMed ID: 24880845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of computer-aided anteroposterior maxillary incisor movement on ratings of facial attractiveness.
    Schlosser JB; Preston CB; Lampasso J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jan; 127(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15643410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Professional assessment of facial profile attractiveness.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 16102405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Facial attractiveness of skeletal class I and class II malocclusion as perceived by laypeople, patients and clinicians.
    Pace M; Cioffi I; D'antò V; Valletta A; Valletta R; Amato M
    Minerva Stomatol; 2018 Jun; 67(3):77-85. PubMed ID: 29308854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceived relative attractiveness of facial profiles with varying degrees of skeletal anomalies.
    Hönn M; Dietz K; Godt A; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2005 May; 66(3):187-96. PubMed ID: 15959632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bimaxillary protrusion in black Americans--an esthetic evaluation and the treatment considerations.
    Farrow AL; Zarrinnia K; Azizi K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Sep; 104(3):240-50. PubMed ID: 8362785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersons.
    Souza DB; Oliveira AI; Gouvêa GR; Santamaria-Jr M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2022; 27(4):e2220519. PubMed ID: 36074432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.