These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27726842)

  • 21. Facial profile study using 3-dimensional photographs to assess esthetic preferences of Hong Kong Chinese orthognathic patients and laypersons.
    Tan SK; Leung WK; Tang ATH; Zwahlen RA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Feb; 161(2):e105-e113. PubMed ID: 34531091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of the gingival display on posed smile with different facial forms: a comparison of dentists and patients concepts.
    Akhare PJ; Daga A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 23422598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The perception of facial aesthetics in a young Spanish population.
    Macías Gago AB; Romero Maroto M; Crego A
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 21447783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Facial profile preferences, self-awareness and perception among groups of people in the United Arab Emirates.
    Al Taki A; Guidoum A
    J Orthod Sci; 2014 Apr; 3(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 24987664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics.
    Spyropoulos MN; Halazonetis DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):464-71. PubMed ID: 11343017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Attractiveness of facial profiles as rated by individuals with different levels of education.
    Hönn M; Dietz K; Eiselt ML; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jan; 69(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 18213458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perceptions of dentofacial morphology by laypersons, general dentists, and orthodontists.
    Prahl-Andersen B; Boersma H; van der Linden FP; Moore AW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1979 Feb; 98(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 284066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The influence of sagittal position of the mandible in facial attractiveness and social perception.
    Sena LMF; Damasceno E Araújo LAL; Farias ACR; Pereira HSG
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(2):77-86. PubMed ID: 28658359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Esthetic evaluation of the facial profile in rehabilitated adults with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Ferrari Júnior FM; Ayub PV; Capelozza Filho L; Pereira Lauris JR; Garib DG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 73(1):169.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25511967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Anteroposterior lip positions of the most-favored Japanese facial profiles.
    Ioi H; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 16102406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Factors influencing attractiveness of soft tissue profile.
    Khosravanifard B; Rakhshan V; Raeesi E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Jan; 115(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 22858016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs.
    Shafiee R; Korn EL; Pearson H; Boyd RL; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):500-8. PubMed ID: 18405813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The importance of using the entire face to assess facial profile attractiveness.
    Tauk A; Bassil-Nassif N; Mouhanna-Fattal C; Bouserhal J
    Int Orthod; 2016 Mar; 14(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 26867684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Relationship between orthodontic expertise and perception of treatment needs for maxillary protrusion: comparison of dental students, residents, and orthodontists.
    Kuroda S; Fuji A; Sugie M; Uoi S; Kondo R; Ando R; Yamashiro T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Mar; 137(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 20197170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Changes in facial profile after maxillomandibular advancement surgery for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.
    Cohen-Levy J; Petelle B; Vieille E; Dumitrache M; Fleury B
    Int Orthod; 2013 Mar; 11(1):71-92. PubMed ID: 23402956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perception of smile esthetics among Indian dental professionals and laypersons.
    Kumar S; Gandhi S; Valiathan A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):295. PubMed ID: 22945732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Aesthetic evaluation of profile incisor inclination.
    Ghaleb N; Bouserhal J; Bassil-Nassif N
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Jun; 33(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 20716642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Methods to evaluate profile preferences for the anteroposterior position of the mandible.
    Orsini MG; Huang GJ; Kiyak HA; Ramsay DS; Bollen AM; Anderson NK; Giddon DB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 16979485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessed facial normality after Twin Block therapy.
    Sattarzadeh AP; Lee RT
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 20133514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparision of profile macro-estethic perception among orthodontists, dentistry students, orthodontic patients and surgical orthodontic patients.
    Cassetta M; Guarnieri R; Mezio M; Altieri F; Brandetti G; Padalino G; Di Giorgio R; Barbato E
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2020 Dec; 12(12):e1109-e1116. PubMed ID: 33282130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.