BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27729082)

  • 1. Two-month longitudinal study of mechanical properties of absorbable sutures used in orthopedic surgery.
    Müller DA; Snedeker JG; Meyer DC
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Oct; 11(1):111. PubMed ID: 27729082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tensile properties of synthetic, absorbable monofilament suture materials before and after incubation in phosphate-buffered saline.
    Tobias KM; Kidd CE; Mulon PY; Zhu X
    Vet Surg; 2020 Apr; 49(3):550-560. PubMed ID: 31599002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of chemotherapy and heat on biomechanical properties of absorbable sutures.
    Lapointe S; Zhim F; Sidéris L; Drolet P; Célestin-Noël S; Dubé P
    J Surg Res; 2016 Jan; 200(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 26505660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats.
    Sanz LE; Patterson JA; Kamath R; Willett G; Ahmed SW; Butterfield AB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):418-22. PubMed ID: 3126470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of human urine on the tensile strength of sutures used for hypospadias surgery.
    Kerstein RL; Sedaghati T; Seifalian AM; Kang N
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Jun; 66(6):835-8. PubMed ID: 23558021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Material properties of common suture materials in orthopaedic surgery.
    Najibi S; Banglmeier R; Matta J; Tannast M
    Iowa Orthop J; 2010; 30():84-8. PubMed ID: 21045977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical properties of Triclosan sutures.
    Jungwirth-Weinberger A; Grubhofer F; Imam MA; Bachmann E; Wirth S
    J Orthop Res; 2018 Jun; 36(6):1777-1782. PubMed ID: 29205483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Knotting abilities of a new absorbable monofilament suture: poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl).
    Trimbos JB; Niggebrugge A; Trimbos R; Van Rijssel EJ
    Eur J Surg; 1995 May; 161(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 7662774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Species-dependent premature degradation of absorbable suture materials caused by infection--impact on the choice of thread in vascular surgery.
    Larena-Avellaneda A; Debus ES; Diener H; Dietz UA; Franke S; Thiedel A
    Vasa; 2004 Aug; 33(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 15461069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of superoxide ions in the degradation of synthetic absorbable sutures.
    Lee KH; Chu CC
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2000 Jan; 49(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 10559743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical comparison of 10 suture materials before and after in vivo incubation.
    Greenwald D; Shumway S; Albear P; Gottlieb L
    J Surg Res; 1994 Apr; 56(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 8152233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vivo and in vitro degradation of monofilament absorbable sutures, PDS and Maxon.
    Metz SA; Chegini N; Masterson BJ
    Biomaterials; 1990 Jan; 11(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 2105750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tensile strength of absorbable suture materials: in vitro analysis of the effects of pH and bacteria.
    Chung E; McPherson N; Grant A
    J Surg Educ; 2009; 66(4):208-11. PubMed ID: 19896625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative evaluation of stiffness of commercial suture materials.
    Chu CC; Kizil Z
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Mar; 168(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 2919353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lapra-Ty holding strength and slippage with various suture types and sizes.
    Weld KJ; Arzola J; Montiglio C; Bush AC; Cespedes RD
    Urology; 2008 Jan; 71(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 18242360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strength retention properties of self-reinforced poly L-lactide (SR-PLLA) sutures compared with polyglyconate (Maxon) and polydioxanone (PDS) sutures. An in vitro study.
    Mäkelä P; Pohjonen T; Törmälä P; Waris T; Ashammakhi N
    Biomaterials; 2002 Jun; 23(12):2587-92. PubMed ID: 12033607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In-vivo comparison of four absorbable sutures: Vicryl, Dexon Plus, Maxon and PDS.
    Bourne RB; Bitar H; Andreae PR; Martin LM; Finlay JB; Marquis F
    Can J Surg; 1988 Jan; 31(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 2827875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breaking strength and diameter of absorbable sutures after in vivo exposure in the rat.
    Outlaw KK; Vela AR; O'Leary JP
    Am Surg; 1998 Apr; 64(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 9544148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Maxon and PDS--evaluation and physical and biologic properties of monofilament absorbable suture materials].
    Knoop M; Lünstedt B; Thiede A
    Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1987; 371(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 3114577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparative evaluation of tensile strength of absorbable threads Dexon and Maxon. Experimental studies].
    Kulak Z; Deja A; Tuszewski M
    Polim Med; 1991; 21(1-2):43-8. PubMed ID: 1667692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.