These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27729082)

  • 1. Two-month longitudinal study of mechanical properties of absorbable sutures used in orthopedic surgery.
    Müller DA; Snedeker JG; Meyer DC
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Oct; 11(1):111. PubMed ID: 27729082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tensile properties of synthetic, absorbable monofilament suture materials before and after incubation in phosphate-buffered saline.
    Tobias KM; Kidd CE; Mulon PY; Zhu X
    Vet Surg; 2020 Apr; 49(3):550-560. PubMed ID: 31599002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of chemotherapy and heat on biomechanical properties of absorbable sutures.
    Lapointe S; Zhim F; Sidéris L; Drolet P; Célestin-Noël S; Dubé P
    J Surg Res; 2016 Jan; 200(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 26505660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats.
    Sanz LE; Patterson JA; Kamath R; Willett G; Ahmed SW; Butterfield AB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):418-22. PubMed ID: 3126470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of human urine on the tensile strength of sutures used for hypospadias surgery.
    Kerstein RL; Sedaghati T; Seifalian AM; Kang N
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Jun; 66(6):835-8. PubMed ID: 23558021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Material properties of common suture materials in orthopaedic surgery.
    Najibi S; Banglmeier R; Matta J; Tannast M
    Iowa Orthop J; 2010; 30():84-8. PubMed ID: 21045977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical properties of Triclosan sutures.
    Jungwirth-Weinberger A; Grubhofer F; Imam MA; Bachmann E; Wirth S
    J Orthop Res; 2018 Jun; 36(6):1777-1782. PubMed ID: 29205483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Knotting abilities of a new absorbable monofilament suture: poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl).
    Trimbos JB; Niggebrugge A; Trimbos R; Van Rijssel EJ
    Eur J Surg; 1995 May; 161(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 7662774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Species-dependent premature degradation of absorbable suture materials caused by infection--impact on the choice of thread in vascular surgery.
    Larena-Avellaneda A; Debus ES; Diener H; Dietz UA; Franke S; Thiedel A
    Vasa; 2004 Aug; 33(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 15461069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of superoxide ions in the degradation of synthetic absorbable sutures.
    Lee KH; Chu CC
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2000 Jan; 49(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 10559743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical comparison of 10 suture materials before and after in vivo incubation.
    Greenwald D; Shumway S; Albear P; Gottlieb L
    J Surg Res; 1994 Apr; 56(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 8152233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vivo and in vitro degradation of monofilament absorbable sutures, PDS and Maxon.
    Metz SA; Chegini N; Masterson BJ
    Biomaterials; 1990 Jan; 11(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 2105750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tensile strength of absorbable suture materials: in vitro analysis of the effects of pH and bacteria.
    Chung E; McPherson N; Grant A
    J Surg Educ; 2009; 66(4):208-11. PubMed ID: 19896625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative evaluation of stiffness of commercial suture materials.
    Chu CC; Kizil Z
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Mar; 168(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 2919353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lapra-Ty holding strength and slippage with various suture types and sizes.
    Weld KJ; Arzola J; Montiglio C; Bush AC; Cespedes RD
    Urology; 2008 Jan; 71(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 18242360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strength retention properties of self-reinforced poly L-lactide (SR-PLLA) sutures compared with polyglyconate (Maxon) and polydioxanone (PDS) sutures. An in vitro study.
    Mäkelä P; Pohjonen T; Törmälä P; Waris T; Ashammakhi N
    Biomaterials; 2002 Jun; 23(12):2587-92. PubMed ID: 12033607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In-vivo comparison of four absorbable sutures: Vicryl, Dexon Plus, Maxon and PDS.
    Bourne RB; Bitar H; Andreae PR; Martin LM; Finlay JB; Marquis F
    Can J Surg; 1988 Jan; 31(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 2827875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breaking strength and diameter of absorbable sutures after in vivo exposure in the rat.
    Outlaw KK; Vela AR; O'Leary JP
    Am Surg; 1998 Apr; 64(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 9544148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Maxon and PDS--evaluation and physical and biologic properties of monofilament absorbable suture materials].
    Knoop M; Lünstedt B; Thiede A
    Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1987; 371(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 3114577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparative evaluation of tensile strength of absorbable threads Dexon and Maxon. Experimental studies].
    Kulak Z; Deja A; Tuszewski M
    Polim Med; 1991; 21(1-2):43-8. PubMed ID: 1667692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.