BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27729430)

  • 1. Continuous measurement of breast tumour hormone receptor expression: a comparison of two computational pathology platforms.
    Ahern TP; Beck AH; Rosner BA; Glass B; Frieling G; Collins LC; Tamimi RM
    J Clin Pathol; 2017 May; 70(5):428-434. PubMed ID: 27729430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Novel image analysis approach for quantifying expression of nuclear proteins assessed by immunohistochemistry: application to measurement of oestrogen and progesterone receptor levels in breast cancer.
    Rexhepaj E; Brennan DJ; Holloway P; Kay EW; McCann AH; Landberg G; Duffy MJ; Jirstrom K; Gallagher WM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2008; 10(5):R89. PubMed ID: 18947395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Absent progesterone receptor expression in the lymph node metastases of ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer is associated with relapse on tamoxifen.
    Snell CE; Gough M; Middleton K; Hsieh M; Furnas L; Seidl B; Gibbons K; Pyke C; Shannon C; Woodward N; Armes JE
    J Clin Pathol; 2017 Nov; 70(11):954-960. PubMed ID: 28416639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Study on breast carcinoma Her2/neu and hormonal receptors status assessed by automated images analysis systems: ACIS III (Dako) and ScanScope (Aperio).
    Słodkowska J; Filas V; Buszkiewicz E; Trzeciak P; Wojciechowski M; Koktysz R; Staniszewski W; Breborowicz J; Rojo MG
    Folia Histochem Cytobiol; 2010 Jan; 48(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 20529811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinicopathological characteristics of oestrogen receptor negative, progesterone receptor positive breast cancers: re-evaluating subsets within this group.
    Ahmed SS; Thike AA; Zhang K; Lim JC; Tan PH
    J Clin Pathol; 2017 Apr; 70(4):320-326. PubMed ID: 27612503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrated tumor identification and automated scoring minimizes pathologist involvement and provides new insights to key biomarkers in breast cancer.
    Bankhead P; Fernández JA; McArt DG; Boyle DP; Li G; Loughrey MB; Irwin GW; Harkin DP; James JA; McQuaid S; Salto-Tellez M; Hamilton PW
    Lab Invest; 2018 Jan; 98(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 29251737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Artificial Intelligence Algorithms to Assess Hormonal Status From Tissue Microarrays in Patients With Breast Cancer.
    Shamai G; Binenbaum Y; Slossberg R; Duek I; Gil Z; Kimmel R
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Jul; 2(7):e197700. PubMed ID: 31348505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of automated image analysis of breast cancer tissue microarrays for epidemiologic studies.
    Bolton KL; Garcia-Closas M; Pfeiffer RM; Duggan MA; Howat WJ; Hewitt SM; Yang XR; Cornelison R; Anzick SL; Meltzer P; Davis S; Lenz P; Figueroa JD; Pharoah PD; Sherman ME
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2010 Apr; 19(4):992-9. PubMed ID: 20332278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) of breast pathology using immunohistochemistry results of core needle biopsy samples for synaptophysin, oestrogen receptor and CK14/p63 for classification of epithelial proliferative lesions of the breast.
    Maeda I; Kubota M; Ohta J; Shinno K; Tajima S; Ariizumi Y; Doi M; Oana Y; Kanemaki Y; Tsugawa K; Ueno T; Takagi M
    J Clin Pathol; 2017 Dec; 70(12):1057-1062. PubMed ID: 28630050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of threshold values for determining the size of the fraction of steroid hormone receptor-positive tumor cells in paraffin-embedded breast carcinomas.
    Leers MP; Hoop JG; van Beers M; van Rodijnen N; Pannebakker M; Nap M
    Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2005 Mar; 64(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 15668953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An optimized image analysis algorithm for detecting nuclear signals in digital whole slides for histopathology.
    Paulik R; Micsik T; Kiszler G; Kaszál P; Székely J; Paulik N; Várhalmi E; Prémusz V; Krenács T; Molnár B
    Cytometry A; 2017 Jun; 91(6):595-608. PubMed ID: 28472544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of ER, PR and HER-2/neu (C-erb B 2) reactivity pattern with histologic grade, tumor size and lymph node status in breast cancer.
    Azizun-Nisa ; Bhurgri Y; Raza F; Kayani N
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2008; 9(4):553-6. PubMed ID: 19256737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer: comparison between enzyme immunoassay and computer-assisted image analysis of immunocytochemical assay.
    Cavaliere A; Bucciarelli E; Sidoni A; Bianchi G; Pietropaoli N; Ludovini V; Vitali R
    Cytometry; 1996 Sep; 26(3):204-8. PubMed ID: 8889392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technical note on the validation of a semi-automated image analysis software application for estrogen and progesterone receptor detection in breast cancer.
    Krecsák L; Micsik T; Kiszler G; Krenács T; Szabó D; Jónás V; Császár G; Czuni L; Gurzó P; Ficsor L; Molnár B
    Diagn Pathol; 2011 Jan; 6():6. PubMed ID: 21244664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of tissue decalcification on the quantification of breast cancer biomarkers by digital image analysis.
    Gertych A; Mohan S; Maclary S; Mohanty S; Wawrowsky K; Mirocha J; Balzer B; Knudsen BS
    Diagn Pathol; 2014 Nov; 9():213. PubMed ID: 25421113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A multisite performance study comparing the reading of immunohistochemical slides on a computer monitor with conventional manual microscopy for estrogen and progesterone receptor analysis.
    Nassar A; Cohen C; Agersborg SS; Zhou W; Lynch KA; Barker EA; Vanderbilt BL; Thompson J; Heyman ER; Olson A; Lange H; Siddiqui MT
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Mar; 135(3):461-7. PubMed ID: 21350103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Association between tumour characteristics and HER-2/neu by immunohistochemistry in 1362 women with primary operable breast cancer.
    Huang HJ; Neven P; Drijkoningen M; Paridaens R; Wildiers H; Van Limbergen E; Berteloot P; Amant F; Vergote I; Christiaens MR
    J Clin Pathol; 2005 Jun; 58(6):611-6. PubMed ID: 15917412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Semi-automated imaging system to quantitate estrogen and progesterone receptor immunoreactivity in human breast cancer.
    Sharangpani GM; Joshi AS; Porter K; Deshpande AS; Keyhani S; Naik GA; Gholap AS; Barsky SH
    J Microsc; 2007 Jun; 226(Pt 3):244-55. PubMed ID: 17535263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distribution, frequency, and quantitative analysis of estrogen, progesterone, androgen, and glucocorticoid receptors in human breast cancer.
    Allegra JC; Lippman ME; Thompson EB; Simon R; Barlock A; Green L; Huff KK; Do HM; Aitken SC
    Cancer Res; 1979 May; 39(5):1447-54. PubMed ID: 427788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coordinated expression of ER, PR and HER2 define different prognostic subtypes among poorly differentiated breast carcinomas.
    Fernandes RC; Bevilacqua JL; Soares IC; Siqueira SA; Pires L; Hegg R; Carvalho FM
    Histopathology; 2009 Sep; 55(3):346-52. PubMed ID: 19723150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.