286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27731502)
1. Accounting for genetic differences among unknown parents in microevolutionary studies: how to include genetic groups in quantitative genetic animal models.
Wolak ME; Reid JM
J Anim Ecol; 2017 Jan; 86(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 27731502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Animal models with group-specific additive genetic variances: extending genetic group models.
Muff S; Niskanen AK; Saatoglu D; Keller LF; Jensen H
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Feb; 51(1):7. PubMed ID: 30819110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bias in estimates of variance components in populations undergoing genomic selection: a simulation study.
Gao H; Madsen P; Aamand GP; Thomasen JR; Sørensen AC; Jensen J
BMC Genomics; 2019 Dec; 20(1):956. PubMed ID: 31818251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correcting for base-population differences and unknown parent groups in single-step genomic predictions of Norwegian Red cattle.
Belay TK; Eikje LS; Gjuvsland AB; Nordbø Ø; Tribout T; Meuwissen T
J Anim Sci; 2022 Sep; 100(9):. PubMed ID: 35752161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Bayesian framework for comparative quantitative genetics.
Ovaskainen O; Cano JM; Merilä J
Proc Biol Sci; 2008 Mar; 275(1635):669-78. PubMed ID: 18211881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct and indirect genetic and fine-scale location effects on breeding date in song sparrows.
Germain RR; Wolak ME; Arcese P; Losdat S; Reid JM
J Anim Ecol; 2016 Nov; 85(6):1613-1624. PubMed ID: 27448623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pedigree-free animal models: the relatedness matrix reloaded.
Frentiu FD; Clegg SM; Chittock J; Burke T; Blows MW; Owens IP
Proc Biol Sci; 2008 Mar; 275(1635):639-47. PubMed ID: 18211872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating quantitative genetic parameters in wild populations: a comparison of pedigree and genomic approaches.
Bérénos C; Ellis PA; Pilkington JG; Pemberton JM
Mol Ecol; 2014 Jul; 23(14):3434-51. PubMed ID: 24917482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficient ways to combine data from broiler and layer chickens to account for sequential genomic selection.
Hidalgo J; Lourenco D; Tsuruta S; Bermann M; Breen V; Herring W; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37249185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of genomic selection and genotyping strategy on estimation of variance components in animal models using different relationship matrices.
Wang L; Janss LL; Madsen P; Henshall J; Huang CH; Marois D; Alemu S; Sørensen AC; Jensen J
Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Jun; 52(1):31. PubMed ID: 32527317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between estimation of breeding values and fixed effects using Bayesian and empirical BLUP estimation under selection on parents and missing pedigree information.
Schenkel FS; Schaeffer LR; Boettcher PJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2002; 34(1):41-59. PubMed ID: 11929624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of depth of pedigree and inclusion of historical data on the estimation of additive variance and breeding values in a sugarcane breeding program.
Atkin FC; Dieters MJ; Stringer JK
Theor Appl Genet; 2009 Aug; 119(3):555-65. PubMed ID: 19597798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simulation of functional additive and non-additive genetic effects using statistical estimates from quantitative genetic models.
Chu TT; Kristensen PS; Jensen J
Heredity (Edinb); 2024 Jul; 133(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 38822133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conceptualizing the evolutionary quantitative genetics of phenological life-history events: Breeding time as a plastic threshold trait.
Reid JM; Acker P
Evol Lett; 2022 Jun; 6(3):220-233. PubMed ID: 35784452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bias in genomic predictions by mating practices for linear type traits in a large-scale genomic evaluation.
Tsuruta S; Lawlor TJ; Lourenco DAL; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jan; 104(1):662-677. PubMed ID: 33162076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combining capture-recapture data and pedigree information to assess heritability of demographic parameters in the wild.
Papaïx J; Cubaynes S; Buoro M; Charmantier A; Perret P; Gimenez O
J Evol Biol; 2010 Oct; 23(10):2176-2184. PubMed ID: 20722892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating Heritability from Nuclear Family and Pedigree Data.
Bochud M
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():195-210. PubMed ID: 28980247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wild pedigrees: the way forward.
Pemberton JM
Proc Biol Sci; 2008 Mar; 275(1635):613-21. PubMed ID: 18211868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the "animal model".
Kruuk LE
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2004 Jun; 359(1446):873-90. PubMed ID: 15306404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
