These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27731502)

  • 21. Is single-step genomic REML with the algorithm for proven and young more computationally efficient when less generations of data are present?
    Junqueira VS; Lourenco D; Masuda Y; Cardoso FF; Lopes PS; Silva FFE; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2022 May; 100(5):. PubMed ID: 35289906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Genome-Enabled Estimates of Additive and Nonadditive Genetic Variances and Prediction of Apple Phenotypes Across Environments.
    Kumar S; Molloy C; Muñoz P; Daetwyler H; Chagné D; Volz R
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2711-8. PubMed ID: 26497141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Metafounders are related to F
    Garcia-Baccino CA; Legarra A; Christensen OF; Misztal I; Pocrnic I; Vitezica ZG; Cantet RJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Mar; 49(1):34. PubMed ID: 28283016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. General Methods for Evolutionary Quantitative Genetic Inference from Generalized Mixed Models.
    de Villemereuil P; Schielzeth H; Nakagawa S; Morrissey M
    Genetics; 2016 Nov; 204(3):1281-1294. PubMed ID: 27591750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimation of quantitative genetic parameters.
    Thompson R
    Proc Biol Sci; 2008 Mar; 275(1635):679-86. PubMed ID: 18211869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Extending pedigree analysis for uncertain parentage and diverse breeding systems.
    Lacy RC
    J Hered; 2012; 103(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 22275398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Controlling bias in genomic breeding values for young genotyped bulls.
    Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Nov; 102(11):9956-9970. PubMed ID: 31495630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Estimation of Genetic Variance in Fitness, and Inference of Adaptation, When Fitness Follows a Log-Normal Distribution.
    Bonnet T; Morrissey MB; Kruuk LEB
    J Hered; 2019 Jul; 110(4):383-395. PubMed ID: 31242286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The empirical bias of estimates by restricted maximum likelihood, Bayesian method, and method R under selection for additive, maternal, and dominance models.
    Duangjinda M; Misztal I; Bertrand JK; Tsuruta S
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Dec; 79(12):2991-6. PubMed ID: 11811451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?
    Wang J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():4-13. PubMed ID: 26344786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. RAD-sequencing for estimating genomic relatedness matrix-based heritability in the wild: A case study in roe deer.
    Gervais L; Perrier C; Bernard M; Merlet J; Pemberton JM; Pujol B; Quéméré E
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Sep; 19(5):1205-1217. PubMed ID: 31058463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Predicting evolutionary responses to selection on polyandry in the wild: additive genetic covariances with female extra-pair reproduction.
    Reid JM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2012 Nov; 279(1747):4652-60. PubMed ID: 22993252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Erratum: Eyestalk Ablation to Increase Ovarian Maturation in Mud Crabs.
    J Vis Exp; 2023 May; (195):. PubMed ID: 37235796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Estimation of genetic parameters using sampled data from populations undergoing selection.
    Jensen J; Mao IL
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Oct; 74(10):3544-51. PubMed ID: 1744281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A simple algorithm to estimate genetic variance in an animal threshold model using Bayesian inference.
    Ødegård J; Meuwissen TH; Heringstad B; Madsen P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2010 Jul; 42(1):29. PubMed ID: 20649962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimating Inbreeding Rates in Natural Populations: Addressing the Problem of Incomplete Pedigrees.
    Miller MP; Haig SM; Ballou JD; Steel EA
    J Hered; 2017 Jul; 108(5):574-582. PubMed ID: 28398480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. EVOLUTIONARY PREDICTABILITY IN NATURAL POPULATIONS: DO MATING SYSTEM AND NONADDITIVE GENETIC VARIANCE INTERACT TO AFFECT HERITABILITIES IN PLANTAGO LANCEOLATA?
    Tonsor SJ; Goodnight CJ
    Evolution; 1997 Dec; 51(6):1773-1784. PubMed ID: 28565103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Best linear unbiased prediction of genomic breeding values using a trait-specific marker-derived relationship matrix.
    Zhang Z; Liu J; Ding X; Bijma P; de Koning DJ; Zhang Q
    PLoS One; 2010 Sep; 5(9):. PubMed ID: 20844593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Relatedness in the post-genomic era: is it still useful?
    Speed D; Balding DJ
    Nat Rev Genet; 2015 Jan; 16(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 25404112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Erratum: High-Throughput Identification of Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. Tomato in Tomato using Seedling Flood Assay.
    J Vis Exp; 2023 Oct; (200):. PubMed ID: 37851522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.