BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

515 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27731533)

  • 1. Blastocyst vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes.
    Martins WP; Nastri CO; Rienzi L; van der Poel SZ; Gracia C; Racowsky C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 May; 49(5):583-591. PubMed ID: 27731533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.
    Glujovsky D; Blake D; Farquhar C; Bardach A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Jul; (7):CD002118. PubMed ID: 22786480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception.
    Blake D; Proctor M; Johnson N; Olive D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (2):CD002118. PubMed ID: 12076439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.
    Glujovsky D; Farquhar C; Quinteiro Retamar AM; Alvarez Sedo CR; Blake D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Jun; (6):CD002118. PubMed ID: 27357126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Number of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection.
    Kamath MS; Mascarenhas M; Kirubakaran R; Bhattacharya S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Aug; 8(8):CD003416. PubMed ID: 32827168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception.
    Blake D; Proctor M; Johnson N; Olive D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Oct; (4):CD002118. PubMed ID: 16235296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception.
    Blake DA; Farquhar CM; Johnson N; Proctor M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Oct; (4):CD002118. PubMed ID: 17943767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intrauterine administration of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for subfertile women undergoing assisted reproduction.
    Craciunas L; Tsampras N; Raine-Fenning N; Coomarasamy A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 10(10):CD011537. PubMed ID: 30341915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Obstetrical and perinatal outcomes following blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Martins WP; Nastri CO; Rienzi L; van der Poel SZ; Gracia CR; Racowsky C
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2561-2569. PubMed ID: 27907898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer following in vitro fertilization No. 182, September 2006.
    JOINT SOGC-CFAS
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Aug; 102(2):203-16. PubMed ID: 18773532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Congenital anomaly and perinatal outcome following blastocyst- vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Siristatidis C; Papapanou M; Karageorgiou V; Martins WP; Bellos I; Teixeira DM; Vlahos N
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 61(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 35751886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The likelihood of live birth and multiple birth after single versus double embryo transfer at the cleavage stage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Gelbaya TA; Tsoumpou I; Nardo LG
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Aug; 94(3):936-45. PubMed ID: 19446809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of cryopreservation on perinatal outcome after blastocyst- vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Alviggi C; Conforti A; Carbone IF; Borrelli R; de Placido G; Guerriero S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 51(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 29077229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single blastocyst stage versus single cleavage stage embryo transfer following fresh transfer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li Y; Liu S; Lv Q
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Dec; 267():11-17. PubMed ID: 34689021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Time-lapse embryo imaging for improving reproductive outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Polanski LT; Coelho Neto MA; Nastri CO; Navarro PA; Ferriani RA; Raine-Fenning N; Martins WP
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Oct; 44(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 24890582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Live birth rates after transfer of equal number of blastocysts or cleavage-stage embryos in IVF. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Papanikolaou EG; Kolibianakis EM; Tournaye H; Venetis CA; Fatemi H; Tarlatzis B; Devroey P
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Jan; 23(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 17965420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Artificial oocyte activation to improve reproductive outcomes in women with previous fertilization failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.
    Sfontouris IA; Nastri CO; Lima ML; Tahmasbpourmarzouni E; Raine-Fenning N; Martins WP
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1831-41. PubMed ID: 26082476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies after blastocyst-stage embryo transfer compared with those after cleavage-stage embryo transfer: a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis.
    Marconi N; Allen CP; Bhattacharya S; Maheshwari A
    Hum Reprod Update; 2022 Feb; 28(2):255-281. PubMed ID: 34967896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Blastocyst culture using single versus sequential media in clinical IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Sfontouris IA; Martins WP; Nastri CO; Viana IG; Navarro PA; Raine-Fenning N; van der Poel S; Rienzi L; Racowsky C
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Oct; 33(10):1261-1272. PubMed ID: 27491772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Late stages of embryo progression are a much better predictor of clinical pregnancy than early cleavage in intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization cycles with blastocyst-stage transfer.
    Rehman KS; Bukulmez O; Langley M; Carr BR; Nackley AC; Doody KM; Doody KJ
    Fertil Steril; 2007 May; 87(5):1041-52. PubMed ID: 17336973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.