These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27732018)

  • 1. Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?
    Cheryan S; Ziegler SA; Montoya AK; Jiang L
    Psychol Bull; 2017 Jan; 143(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 27732018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape.
    Ceci SJ; Ginther DK; Kahn S; Williams WM
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2014 Dec; 15(3):75-141. PubMed ID: 26172066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethnic variation in gender-STEM stereotypes and STEM participation: an intersectional approach.
    O'Brien LT; Blodorn A; Adams G; Garcia DM; Hammer E
    Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol; 2015 Apr; 21(2):169-80. PubMed ID: 25244590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gender productivity gap among star performers in STEM and other scientific fields.
    Aguinis H; Ji YH; Joo H
    J Appl Psychol; 2018 Dec; 103(12):1283-1306. PubMed ID: 30024197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multi-year science research or engineering experience in high school gives women confidence to continue in the STEM pipeline or seek advancement in other fields: A 20-year longitudinal study.
    Hunt PK; Dong M; Miller CM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0258717. PubMed ID: 34731176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Unstable identity compatibility: how gender rejection sensitivity undermines the success of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields.
    Ahlqvist S; London B; Rosenthal L
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1644-52. PubMed ID: 23818652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Not lack of ability but more choice: individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.
    Wang MT; Eccles JS; Kenny S
    Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):770-5. PubMed ID: 23508740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM.
    Casad BJ; Franks JE; Garasky CE; Kittleman MM; Roesler AC; Hall DY; Petzel ZW
    J Neurosci Res; 2021 Jan; 99(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 33103281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Cultural Psychological Model of Cross-National Variation in Gender Gaps in STEM Participation.
    Soylu Yalcinkaya N; Adams G
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2020 Nov; 24(4):345-370. PubMed ID: 32791896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Longitudinal stability and change across a year in children's gender stereotypes about four different STEM fields.
    Tang D; Meltzoff AN; Cheryan S; Fan W; Master A
    Dev Psychol; 2024 Jun; 60(6):1109-1130. PubMed ID: 38695824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education.
    Stoet G; Geary DC
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Apr; 29(4):581-593. PubMed ID: 29442575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-lay theories of scientific potential drive underrepresented students' sense of belonging to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).
    Rattan A; Savani K; Komarraju M; Morrison MM; Boggs C; Ambady N
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Jul; 115(1):54-75. PubMed ID: 29911882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Countries with Higher Levels of Gender Equality Show Larger National Sex Differences in Mathematics Anxiety and Relatively Lower Parental Mathematics Valuation for Girls.
    Stoet G; Bailey DH; Moore AM; Geary DC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153857. PubMed ID: 27100631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The confidence gap predicts the gender pay gap among STEM graduates.
    Sterling AD; Thompson ME; Wang S; Kusimo A; Gilmartin S; Sheppard S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Dec; 117(48):30303-30308. PubMed ID: 33199594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Beliefs in "Brilliance" and Belonging Uncertainty in Male and Female STEM Students.
    Deiglmayr A; Stern E; Schubert R
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1114. PubMed ID: 31191382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Seeking congruity between goals and roles: a new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers.
    Diekman AB; Brown ER; Johnston AM; Clark EK
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Aug; 21(8):1051-7. PubMed ID: 20631322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gender stereotypes about interests start early and cause gender disparities in computer science and engineering.
    Master A; Meltzoff AN; Cheryan S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Nov; 118(48):. PubMed ID: 34810255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting student enrollment and persistence in college STEM fields using an expanded P-E fit framework: a large-scale multilevel study.
    Le H; Robbins SB; Westrick P
    J Appl Psychol; 2014 Sep; 99(5):915-47. PubMed ID: 24611525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are gender-science stereotypes barriers for women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics? Exploring when, how, and to whom in an experimentally-controlled setting.
    Sebastián-Tirado A; Félix-Esbrí S; Forn C; Sanchis-Segura C
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1219012. PubMed ID: 37621930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gender differences in individual variation in academic grades fail to fit expected patterns for STEM.
    O'Dea RE; Lagisz M; Jennions MD; Nakagawa S
    Nat Commun; 2018 Sep; 9(1):3777. PubMed ID: 30254267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.