These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27732052)

  • 1. Anomalous results in G-factor models: Explanations and alternatives.
    Eid M; Geiser C; Koch T; Heene M
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Sep; 22(3):541-562. PubMed ID: 27732052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures.
    Reise SP; Morizot J; Hays RD
    Qual Life Res; 2007; 16 Suppl 1():19-31. PubMed ID: 17479357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the Meaning of the "
    Heinrich M; Geiser C; Zagorscak P; Burns GL; Bohn J; Becker SP; Eid M; Beauchaine TP; Knaevelsrud C
    Assessment; 2023 Apr; 30(3):487-507. PubMed ID: 34861784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recovering bifactor models: A comparison of seven methods.
    Giordano C; Waller NG
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Apr; 25(2):143-156. PubMed ID: 31343194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multi-Faceted Constructs in Abnormal Psychology: Implications of the Bifactor S - 1 Model for Individual Clinical Assessment.
    Eid M
    J Abnorm Child Psychol; 2020 Jul; 48(7):895-900. PubMed ID: 32086729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bifactor Models for Predicting Criteria by General and Specific Factors: Problems of Nonidentifiability and Alternative Solutions.
    Eid M; Krumm S; Koch T; Schulze J
    J Intell; 2018 Sep; 6(3):. PubMed ID: 31162469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices.
    Rodriguez A; Reise SP; Haviland MG
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Jun; 21(2):137-50. PubMed ID: 26523435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Explaining general and specific factors in longitudinal, multimethod, and bifactor models: Some caveats and recommendations.
    Koch T; Holtmann J; Bohn J; Eid M
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Sep; 23(3):505-523. PubMed ID: 28737413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Misbegotten methodologies and forgotten lessons from Tom Swift's electric factor analysis machine: A demonstration with competing structural models of psychopathology.
    Greene AL; Watts AL; Forbes MK; Kotov R; Krueger RF; Eaton NR
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Dec; 28(6):1374-1403. PubMed ID: 34990188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Appropriate Use of Bifactor Analysis in Psychopathology Research: Appreciating Benefits and Limitations.
    Bornovalova MA; Choate AM; Fatimah H; Petersen KJ; Wiernik BM
    Biol Psychiatry; 2020 Jul; 88(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 32199605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using an empirical binomial hierarchical Bayesian model as an alternative to analyzing data from multisite studies.
    Hardin JM; Anderson BS; Woodby LL; Crawford MA; Russell TV
    Eval Rev; 2008 Apr; 32(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 18319422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Applying Bifactor Statistical Indices in the Evaluation of Psychological Measures.
    Rodriguez A; Reise SP; Haviland MG
    J Pers Assess; 2016; 98(3):223-37. PubMed ID: 26514921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the unnecessary ubiquity of hierarchical linear modeling.
    McNeish D; Stapleton LM; Silverman RD
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Mar; 22(1):114-140. PubMed ID: 27149401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodological and conceptual issues regarding occupational psychosocial coronary heart disease epidemiology.
    Burr H; Formazin M; Pohrt A
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2016 May; 42(3):251-5. PubMed ID: 26960179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The value of using test response data for content validity: An application of the bifactor-MIRT to a nursing knowledge test.
    Cai Y
    Nurse Educ Today; 2015 Dec; 35(12):1181-5. PubMed ID: 26043656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Introduction to bifactor polytomous item response theory analysis.
    Toland MD; Sulis I; Giambona F; Porcu M; Campbell JM
    J Sch Psychol; 2017 Feb; 60():41-63. PubMed ID: 28164798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Comparison of Bifactor and Second-Order Models of Quality of Life.
    Chen FF; West SG; Sousa KH
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2006 Jun; 41(2):189-225. PubMed ID: 26782910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identifying an appropriate measurement modeling approach for the Mini-Mental State Examination.
    Rubright JD; Nandakumar R; Karlawish J
    Psychol Assess; 2016 Feb; 28(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 26029945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A General Approach for Fitting Pure Exploratory Bifactor Models.
    Lorenzo-Seva U; Ferrando PJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 30160535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.