These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27733003)

  • 1. Standardization of Disposable Instruments in Microvascular Breast Reconstruction: A Case Study in Cost Reduction.
    Still BR; Christianson LW; Mhlaba JM; O'Malley IP; Song DH; Langerman AJ
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2017 Feb; 33(2):92-96. PubMed ID: 27733003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physician Engagement in Improving Operative Supply Chain Efficiency Through Review of Surgeon Preference Cards.
    Harvey LFB; Smith KA; Curlin H
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1116-1120. PubMed ID: 28669894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost containment: an experience with surgeon education and universal preference cards at two institutions.
    Embick E; Bieri M; Koehler TJ; Yang A
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):5148-5152. PubMed ID: 31844970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Standardization of operative equipment reduces cost.
    Avansino JR; Goldin AB; Risley R; Waldhausen JH; Sawin RS
    J Pediatr Surg; 2013 Sep; 48(9):1843-9. PubMed ID: 24074655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of surgeon choice on the cost of performing laparoscopic appendectomy.
    Chu T; Chandhoke RA; Smith PC; Schwaitzberg SD
    Surg Endosc; 2011 Apr; 25(4):1187-91. PubMed ID: 20835717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Operating room waste: disposable supply utilization in neurosurgical procedures.
    Zygourakis CC; Yoon S; Valencia V; Boscardin C; Moriates C; Gonzales R; Lawton MT
    J Neurosurg; 2017 Feb; 126(2):620-625. PubMed ID: 27153160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost Savings in Urology Operating Rooms by Editing Surgeon Preference Cards.
    Pesigan P; Chen H; Bajaj AA; Gill HS
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2021 Apr-Jun 01; 30(2):135-137. PubMed ID: 33783426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments: cost analysis.
    DesCôteaux JG; Tye L; Poulin EC
    Can J Surg; 1996 Apr; 39(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 8769924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microvascular Breast Reconstruction in the Era of Value-Based Care: Use of a Cosurgeon Is Associated with Reduced Costs, Improved Outcomes, and Added Value.
    Mericli AF; Chu CK; Sisk GC; Largo RD; Schaverien MV; Liu J; Villa MT; Garvey PB
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Feb; 149(2):338-348. PubMed ID: 35077407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Model of Cost Reduction and Standardization: Improved Cost Savings While Maintaining the Quality of Care.
    Guzman MJ; Gitelis ME; Linn JG; Ujiki MB; Waskerwitz M; Umanskiy K; Muldoon JP
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Nov; 58(11):1104-7. PubMed ID: 26445185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Instrument and Supply Variability: An Opportunity to Reduce the Carbon Footprint of the Operating Room.
    Sathe TS; Sorrentino TA; Wang K; Yap A; Wang JJ; Matthys M; Yin R; Alseidi A; Lee H; Gandhi S
    J Surg Res; 2024 Mar; 295():732-739. PubMed ID: 38142576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A study of added costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on surgery preference cards.
    Allen JW; Polk HC
    Am Surg; 2002 May; 68(5):474-6. PubMed ID: 12013293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the costs of disposable and reusable supplies wasted during surgeries.
    Chasseigne V; Leguelinel-Blache G; Nguyen TL; de Tayrac R; Prudhomme M; Kinowski JM; Costa P
    Int J Surg; 2018 May; 53():18-23. PubMed ID: 29432971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective comparison of the costs of reusable and limited-reuse laparoscopic instruments.
    DesCôteaux JG; Blackmore K; Parsons L
    Can J Surg; 1998 Apr; 41(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9575997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Adler S; Scherrer M; Rückauer KD; Daschner FD
    Surg Endosc; 2005 Feb; 19(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 15580444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reducing costs while maintaining quality in endovascular neurosurgical procedures.
    Kashlan ON; Wilson TJ; Chaudhary N; Gemmete JJ; Stetler WR; Dunnick NR; Thompson BG; Pandey AS
    J Neurosurg; 2014 Nov; 121(5):1071-6. PubMed ID: 25170667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Choice to reuse disposables requires factual assessment.
    Reichert M
    OR Manager; 1996 Jun; 12(6):8-9. PubMed ID: 10157858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Educating surgeons on intraoperative disposable supply costs during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a regional health system's experience.
    Gitelis M; Vigneswaran Y; Ujiki MB; Denham W; Talamonti M; Muldoon JP; Linn JG
    Am J Surg; 2015 Mar; 209(3):488-92. PubMed ID: 25586597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The "all-in-one" appendectomy: quick, scarless, and less costly.
    Stylianos S; Nichols L; Ventura N; Malvezzi L; Knight C; Burnweit C
    J Pediatr Surg; 2011 Dec; 46(12):2336-41. PubMed ID: 22152877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The design and evaluation of a novel algorithm for automated preference card optimization.
    Scheinker D; Hollingsworth M; Brody A; Phelps C; Bryant W; Pei F; Petersen K; Reddy A; Wall J
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2021 Jun; 28(6):1088-1097. PubMed ID: 33497439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.