219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27733455)
1. Venous access and long-term pacemaker lead failure: comparing contrast-guided axillary vein puncture with subclavian puncture and cephalic cutdown.
Chan NY; Kwong NP; Cheong AP
Europace; 2017 Jul; 19(7):1193-1197. PubMed ID: 27733455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Low incidence of complications after cephalic vein cutdown for pacemaker lead implantation in children weighing less than 10 kilograms: A single-center experience with long-term follow-up.
Kircanski B; Vasic D; Savic D; Stojanov P
Heart Rhythm; 2015 Aug; 12(8):1820-6. PubMed ID: 25916570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Self-taught axillary vein access without venography for pacemaker implantation: prospective randomized comparison with the cephalic vein access.
Squara F; Tomi J; Scarlatti D; Theodore G; Moceri P; Ferrari E
Europace; 2017 Dec; 19(12):2001-2006. PubMed ID: 28064251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Axillary vein puncture guided by ultrasound vs cephalic vein dissection in pacemaker and defibrillator implant: A multicenter randomized clinical trial.
Tagliari AP; Kochi AN; Mastella B; Saadi RP; di Leoni Ferrari A; Saadi EK; Polanczyk CA
Heart Rhythm; 2020 Sep; 17(9):1554-1560. PubMed ID: 32360827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Venous cutdown versus the Seldinger technique for placement of totally implantable venous access ports.
Hsu CC; Kwan GN; Evans-Barns H; Rophael JA; van Driel ML
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Aug; 2016(8):CD008942. PubMed ID: 27544827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intra-pocket ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture vs. cephalic vein cutdown for cardiac electronic device implantation: the ACCESS trial.
Charles P; Ditac G; Montoy M; Thenard T; Courand PY; Lantelme P; Harbaoui B; Fareh S
Eur Heart J; 2023 Dec; 44(46):4847-4858. PubMed ID: 37832512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fluoroscopy-guided axillary vein access vs cephalic vein access in pacemaker and defibrillator implantation: Randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety.
Jiménez-Díaz J; Higuera-Sobrino F; Piqueras-Flores J; Pérez-Díaz P; González-Marín MA
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Sep; 30(9):1588-1593. PubMed ID: 31310038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perioperative complications after pacemaker implantation: higher complication rates with subclavian vein puncture than with cephalic vein cutdown.
Hasan F; Nedios S; Karosiene Z; Scholten M; Lemke B; Tulka S; Knippschild S; Macher-Heidrich S; Adomeit HJ; Zarse M; Bogossian H
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2023 Jun; 66(4):857-863. PubMed ID: 35107720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy and safety of nitroglycerin for preventing venous spasm during contrast-guided axillary vein puncture for pacemaker or defibrillator leads implantation.
Duan X; Ling F; Shen Y; Yang J; Xu HY; Tong XS
Europace; 2013 Apr; 15(4):566-9. PubMed ID: 22848074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Axillary vein access for antiarrhythmic cardiac device implantation: a literature review.
Sassone B; Valzania C; Laffi M; Virzì S; Luzi M;
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2021 Apr; 22(4):237-245. PubMed ID: 33633038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cephalic vs. subclavian lead implantation in cardiac implantable electronic devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Benz AP; Vamos M; Erath JW; Hohnloser SH
Europace; 2019 Jan; 21(1):121-129. PubMed ID: 30020452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The cephalic vein cutdown versus subclavian puncture for pacemaker/ICD lead implantation.
Parsonnet V; Roelke M
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 May; 22(5):695-7. PubMed ID: 10353126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Systematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous subclavian vein puncture versus surgical venous cutdown for the insertion of a totally implantable venous access device.
Orci LA; Meier RP; Morel P; Staszewicz W; Toso C
Br J Surg; 2014 Jan; 101(2):8-16. PubMed ID: 24276950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A cephalic vein cutdown and venography technique to facilitate pacemaker and defibrillator lead implantation.
Tse HF; Lau CP; Leung SK
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Apr; 24(4 Pt 1):469-73. PubMed ID: 11341084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Subclavian and Axillary Vein Access Versus Cephalic Vein Cutdown for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation: A Meta-Analysis.
Atti V; Turagam MK; Garg J; Koerber S; Angirekula A; Gopinathannair R; Natale A; Lakkireddy D
JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2020 Jun; 6(6):661-671. PubMed ID: 32553216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided axillary/subclavian venous approaches for pacemaker and defibrillator lead implantation: a randomized study.
Liccardo M; Nocerino P; Gaia S; Ciardiello C
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2018 Mar; 51(2):153-160. PubMed ID: 29335840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Axillary vein technique for pacemaker and implantable defibrillator leads implantation: a safe and alternative approach?
Migliore F; Curnis A; Bertaglia E
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2016 Apr; 17(4):309-13. PubMed ID: 25252042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Axillary vein puncture versus cephalic vein cutdown for cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: A meta-analysis.
Vetta G; Magnocavallo M; Parlavecchio A; Caminiti R; Polselli M; Sorgente A; Cauti FM; Crea P; Pannone L; Marcon L; Savio AL; Pistelli L; Vetta F; Chierchia GB; Rossi P; Bianchi S; Natale A; de Asmundis C; Rocca DGD
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2023 Aug; 46(8):942-947. PubMed ID: 37378419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical experience of contrast venography guided axillary vein puncture in biventricular pacing.
Chan NY; Liem LB; Mok NS; Wong W
Int J Cardiol; 2003 Nov; 92(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 14602217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of lead placement through the subclavian vein technique with fluoroscopy-guided axillary vein technique for permanent pacemaker insertion.
Sharma G; Senguttuvan NB; Thachil A; Leong D; Naik N; Yadav R; Juneja R; Bahl VK
Can J Cardiol; 2012; 28(5):542-6. PubMed ID: 22552175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
