These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27733470)

  • 1. Outcomes and costs associated with two different lead-extraction approaches: a single-centre study.
    Gaubert M; Giorgi R; Franceschi F; Koutbi-Franceschi L; Gitenay E; Maille B; Deharo JC
    Europace; 2017 Oct; 19(10):1710-1716. PubMed ID: 27733470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extraction of old pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator leads by laser sheath versus femoral approach.
    Bordachar P; Defaye P; Peyrouse E; Boveda S; Mokrani B; Marquié C; Barandon L; Fossaert EM; Garrigue S; Reuter S; Laborderie J; Marijon E; Deharo JC; Jacon P; Kacet S; Ploux S; Deplagne A; Haissaguerre M; Clementy J; Ritter P; Klug D
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2010 Aug; 3(4):319-23. PubMed ID: 20562442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Success and complication rates of lead extraction with the first- vs. the second-generation Evolution mechanical sheath.
    Witte OA; Adiyaman A; Smit JJJ; Ramdat Misier AR; Elvan A; Ghani A; Delnoy PPHM
    Europace; 2017 Oct; 19(10):1717-1722. PubMed ID: 28339585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A head-to-head comparison of laser vs. powered mechanical sheaths as first choice and second line extraction tools.
    Zsigmond EJ; Saghy L; Benak A; Miklos M; Makai A; Hegedus Z; Alacs E; Agocs S; Vamos M
    Europace; 2023 Feb; 25(2):591-599. PubMed ID: 36352816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness, safety, and long-term outcomes of non-powered mechanical sheaths for transvenous lead extraction.
    Kutarski A; Czajkowski M; Pietura R; Obszanski B; Polewczyk A; Jachec W; Polewczyk M; Mlynarczyk K; Grabowski M; Opolski G
    Europace; 2018 Aug; 20(8):1324-1333. PubMed ID: 29016781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-laser percutaneous extraction of pacemaker and defibrillation leads: a decade of progress.
    Domenichini G; Gonna H; Sharma R; Conti S; Fiorista L; Jones S; Arthur M; Adhya S; Jahangiri M; Rowland E; Gallagher MM
    Europace; 2017 Sep; 19(9):1521-1526. PubMed ID: 28340095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between TightRail rotating dilator sheath and GlideLight laser sheath for transvenous lead extraction.
    Qin D; Chokshi M; Sabeh MK; Maan A; Bapat A; Bode WD; Hanley A; Hucker WJ; Ng CY; Funamoto M; Barrett CD; Mela T
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2021 May; 44(5):895-902. PubMed ID: 33675073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safe and effective transvenous lead extraction for elderly patients utilizing non-laser and laser tools: a single-center experience in Japan.
    Okada A; Tabata H; Shoda M; Shoin W; Kobayashi H; Okano T; Yoshie K; Kato K; Saigusa T; Ebisawa S; Motoki H; Kuwahara K
    Heart Vessels; 2021 Jun; 36(6):882-889. PubMed ID: 33394103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Initial experience of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead extraction with the new GlideLight 80 Hz laser sheaths.
    Hakmi S; Pecha S; Sill B; Reiter B; Willems S; Aydin MA; Yildirim Y; Reichenspurner H; Treede H
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2014 Jan; 18(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 24087832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Advanced techniques for chronic lead extraction: heading from the laser towards the evolution system.
    Mazzone P; Tsiachris D; Marzi A; Ciconte G; Paglino G; Sora N; Gulletta S; Vergara P; Della Bella P
    Europace; 2013 Dec; 15(12):1771-6. PubMed ID: 23645529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Utility of a multipurpose catheter for transvenous extraction of old broken leads: A novel technique for fragile leads.
    Okada A; Higuchi S; Shoda M; Tabata H; Kataoka S; Shoin W; Kobayashi H; Okano T; Yoshie K; Kato K; Saigusa T; Ebisawa S; Motoki H; Kuwahara K
    Heart Rhythm; 2023 Jul; 20(7):976-981. PubMed ID: 37001747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Procedural outcomes associated with transvenous lead extraction in patients with abandoned leads: an ESC-EHRA ELECTRa (European Lead Extraction ConTRolled) Registry Sub-Analysis.
    Segreti L; Rinaldi CA; Claridge S; Svendsen JH; Blomstrom-Lundqvist C; Auricchio A; Butter C; Dagres N; Deharo JC; Maggioni AP; Kutarski A; Kennergren C; Laroche C; Kempa M; Magnani A; Casteigt B; Bongiorni MG;
    Europace; 2019 Apr; 21(4):645-654. PubMed ID: 30624715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of non-laser and laser transvenous lead extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Akhtar Z; Kontogiannis C; Georgiopoulos G; Starck CT; Leung LWM; Lee SY; Lee BK; Seshasai SRK; Sohal M; Gallagher MM
    Europace; 2023 Nov; 25(11):. PubMed ID: 37882609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of outcomes and required tools between transvenous extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads: Insight from single high-volume center experience.
    Hayashi K; Callahan T; Rickard J; Baranowski B; Martin DO; Nakhla S; Tabaja C; Paul A; Wilkoff BL
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2024 Jul; 35(7):1382-1392. PubMed ID: 38725252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transvenous lead extraction with laser reduces need for femoral approach during the procedure.
    Younis A; Glikson M; Meitus A; Arwas N; Natanzon SS; Lotan D; Luria D; Beinart R; Nof E
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215589. PubMed ID: 31034499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simultaneous lead traction from above and below: A novel technique to reduce the risk of superior vena cava injury during transvenous lead extraction.
    Schaller RD; Sadek MM; Cooper JM
    Heart Rhythm; 2018 Nov; 15(11):1655-1663. PubMed ID: 29803849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficacy and safety of transvenous lead extraction in 108 consecutive patients: a single-centre experience.
    Monsefi N; Waraich HS; Vamos M; Erath J; Sirat S; Moritz A; Hohnloser SH
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2019 May; 28(5):704-708. PubMed ID: 30597017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Financial and resource costs of transvenous lead extraction in a high-volume lead extraction centre.
    Gould J; Sidhu BS; Porter B; Sieniewicz BJ; Freeman S; de Wilt EC; Glover JC; Razavi R; Rinaldi CA
    Heart; 2020 Jun; 106(12):931-937. PubMed ID: 31932286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New onset of phrenic nerve palsy after laser-assisted transvenous lead extraction: a single-centre experience.
    Özkartal T; Regoli F; Conte G; Caputo ML; Klersy C; Moccetti T; Auricchio A
    Europace; 2018 Nov; 20(11):1827-1832. PubMed ID: 29672695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Employment of the Evolution RL sheath as a first-choice device shortens transvenous lead extraction time without affecting procedural safety and efficacy compared to its auxiliary use: Insights from the prospective multicenter EVO registry.
    Przybylski A; Jagielski D; Hrymniak B; Michalak M; Wójcik T; Syska P; Fabiszak T; Rokicki J; Małecka B; Ząbek A; Kaczmarek K; Zaręba L; Sterliński M
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2023 Nov; 32(11):1249-1256. PubMed ID: 37078411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.