241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27733509)
1. Postoperative early ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen identifies patients at risk for biochemical recurrence in margin positive prostate cancers: a single-center study.
Hatano K; Okusa T; Ishizuya Y; Nakai Y; Nakayama M; Kakimoto KI; Nishimura K
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2017 Jan; 47(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 27733509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.
Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen after prostatectomy reliably identifies patients requiring postoperative radiotherapy.
Kang JJ; Reiter RE; Steinberg ML; King CR
J Urol; 2015 May; 193(5):1532-8. PubMed ID: 25463990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era.
Boorjian SA; Thompson RH; Siddiqui S; Bagniewski S; Bergstralh EJ; Karnes RJ; Frank I; Blute ML
J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):864-70; discussion 870-1. PubMed ID: 17631342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do Ultrasensitive Prostate Specific Antigen Measurements Have a Role in Predicting Long-Term Biochemical Recurrence-Free Survival in Men after Radical Prostatectomy?
Sokoll LJ; Zhang Z; Chan DW; Reese AC; Bivalacqua TJ; Partin AW; Walsh PC
J Urol; 2016 Feb; 195(2):330-6. PubMed ID: 26307160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. First Postprostatectomy Ultrasensitive Prostate-specific Antigen Predicts Survival in Patients with High-risk Prostate Cancer Pathology.
Kang JJ; Reiter RE; Steinberg ML; King CR
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):378-385. PubMed ID: 31158076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PSA doubling time as a predictor of clinical progression after biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Roberts SG; Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Zincke H
Mayo Clin Proc; 2001 Jun; 76(6):576-81. PubMed ID: 11393495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Early prostate-specific antigen relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy: prediction on the basis of preoperative and postoperative tumor characteristics.
Graefen M; Noldus J; Pichlmeier U; Haese A; Hammerer P; Fernandez S; Conrad S; Henke R; Huland E; Huland H
Eur Urol; 1999; 36(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 10364651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence.
Shikanov S; Song J; Royce C; Al-Ahmadie H; Zorn K; Steinberg G; Zagaja G; Shalhav A; Eggener S
J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):139-44. PubMed ID: 19450829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-year postoperative ultrasensitive prostate-specific antigen following open radical retropubic prostatectomy is a predictor for delayed biochemical recurrence.
Malik RD; Goldberg JD; Hochman T; Lepor H
Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):548-53. PubMed ID: 21652145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Usefulness of the nadir value of serum prostate-specific antigen measured by an ultrasensitive assay as a predictor of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Sakai I; Harada K; Kurahashi T; Muramaki M; Yamanaka K; Hara I; Inoue TA; Miyake H
Urol Int; 2006; 76(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 16601384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of lymphovascular invasion on lymph node metastasis for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with negative resection margin.
Kang YJ; Kim HS; Jang WS; Kwon JK; Yoon CY; Lee JY; Cho KS; Ham WS; Choi YD
BMC Cancer; 2017 May; 17(1):321. PubMed ID: 28482884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Kattan MW; Wheeler TM; Scardino PT
J Clin Oncol; 1999 May; 17(5):1499-507. PubMed ID: 10334537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Analysis of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy].
Dai B; Chang K; Kong Y; Qu Y; Wang Y; Jia Z; Ye D; Wang C; Zhang H; Yang W
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Apr; 53(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 26269158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A close surgical margin after radical prostatectomy is an independent predictor of recurrence.
Lu J; Wirth GJ; Wu S; Chen J; Dahl DM; Olumi AF; Young RH; McDougal WS; Wu CL
J Urol; 2012 Jul; 188(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 22578729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation of clinical and pathologic factors with rising prostate-specific antigen profiles after radical prostatectomy alone for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Kupelian P; Katcher J; Levin H; Zippe C; Klein E
Urology; 1996 Aug; 48(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 8753737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stratification model based on early postprostatectomy prostate-specific antigen kinetics may help to reduce the risk of overtreatment in candidates for adjuvant radiotherapy.
Vesely S; Jarolim L; Schmidt M; Do Carmo Silva J; Duskova K; Babjuk M
Scand J Urol; 2017 Apr; 51(2):114-119. PubMed ID: 28635569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic value of surgical margin status for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
Hashimoto K; Masumori N; Takei F; Fukuta F; Takahashi A; Itoh N; Hasegawa T; Tsukamoto T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jan; 38(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 18203710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic Factors for Biochemical Recurrence More than 10 Years after Radical Prostatectomy.
Liesenfeld L; Kron M; Gschwend JE; Herkommer K
J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):143-148. PubMed ID: 27418452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]