These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27734271)

  • 1. Improving Allergen Prediction in Main Crops Using a Weighted Integrative Method.
    Li J; Wang J; Li J
    Interdiscip Sci; 2017 Dec; 9(4):545-549. PubMed ID: 27734271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation and integration of existing methods for computational prediction of allergens.
    Wang J; Yu Y; Zhao Y; Zhang D; Li J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013; 14 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S1. PubMed ID: 23514097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Challenges in testing genetically modified crops for potential increases in endogenous allergen expression for safety.
    Panda R; Ariyarathna H; Amnuaycheewa P; Tetteh A; Pramod SN; Taylor SL; Ballmer-Weber BK; Goodman RE
    Allergy; 2013 Feb; 68(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 23205714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PREAL: prediction of allergenic protein by maximum Relevance Minimum Redundancy (mRMR) feature selection.
    Wang J; Zhang D; Li J
    BMC Syst Biol; 2013; 7 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S9. PubMed ID: 24565053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of endogenous allergens for the safety evaluation of genetically engineered food crops: review of potential risks, test methods, examples and relevance.
    Goodman RE; Panda R; Ariyarathna H
    J Agric Food Chem; 2013 Sep; 61(35):8317-32. PubMed ID: 23848840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of possible allergenicity of hypothetical ORFs in common food crops using current bioinformatic guidelines and its implications for the safety assessment of GM crops.
    Young GJ; Zhang S; Mirsky HP; Cressman RF; Cong B; Ladics GS; Zhong CX
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2012 Oct; 50(10):3741-51. PubMed ID: 22867756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of skin prick test results between crude allergen extracts from foods and commercial allergen extracts in atopic dermatitis by double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge for milk, egg, and soybean.
    Kim TE; Park SW; Noh G; Lee S
    Yonsei Med J; 2002 Oct; 43(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 12402374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bioinformatic methods for allergenicity assessment using a comprehensive allergen database.
    Hileman RE; Silvanovich A; Goodman RE; Rice EA; Holleschak G; Astwood JD; Hefle SL
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2002 Aug; 128(4):280-91. PubMed ID: 12218366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prevalence of sensitisation to oilseed rape and maize pollens in France: a multi-center study carried out by the Allergo-Vigilance Network.
    Moneret-Vautrin DA; Peltre G; Gayraud J; Morisset M; Renaudin JM; Martin A
    Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol; 2012 Dec; 44(6):225-35. PubMed ID: 23441440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Allergenicity Assessment of Transgenic Wheat Lines In Silico.
    Mishra A; Arora N
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1679():97-111. PubMed ID: 28913796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Will genetically modified foods be allergenic?
    Taylor SL; Hefle SL
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2001 May; 107(5):765-71. PubMed ID: 11344340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of global sequence comparison and one-to-one FASTA local alignment in regulatory allergenicity assessment of transgenic proteins in food crops.
    Song P; Herman RA; Kumpatla S
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2014 Sep; 71():142-8. PubMed ID: 24953553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Further evaluation of the utility of "sliding window" FASTA in predicting cross-reactivity with allergenic proteins.
    Cressman RF; Ladics G
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3 Suppl):S20-5. PubMed ID: 19114081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Allergenicity at Gly m 4 and Gly m Bd 30K of Soybean after Genetic Modification.
    Tsai JJ; Chang CY; Liao EC
    J Agric Food Chem; 2017 Feb; 65(6):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 28132509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of bioinformatic approaches for predicting allergen cross reactivity.
    Herman RA; Song P
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2019 Oct; 132():110656. PubMed ID: 31279045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Major revision of the allergen database for food safety (ADFS) and validation of the motif-based allergenicity prediction tool].
    Nakamura R; Nakamura R; Teshima R
    Kokuritsu Iyakuhin Shokuhin Eisei Kenkyusho Hokoku; 2009; (127):44-9. PubMed ID: 20306706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of E-scores to determine the quality of protein alignments.
    Silvanovich A; Bannon G; McClain S
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3 Suppl):S26-31. PubMed ID: 19245824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. AllerTOP--a server for in silico prediction of allergens.
    Dimitrov I; Flower DR; Doytchinova I
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013; 14 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S4. PubMed ID: 23735058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the allergic risk of genetically modified soybean.
    Kim SH; Kim HM; Ye YM; Kim SH; Nahm DH; Park HS; Ryu SR; Lee BO
    Yonsei Med J; 2006 Aug; 47(4):505-12. PubMed ID: 16941740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of current allergy assessment guidelines to next-generation biotechnology-derived crops.
    Bannon GA; Martino-Catt S
    J AOAC Int; 2007; 90(5):1492-9. PubMed ID: 17955998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.