These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27734329)

  • 1. The Chinese Lexicon Project: A megastudy of lexical decision performance for 25,000+ traditional Chinese two-character compound words.
    Tse CS; Yap MJ; Chan YL; Sze WP; Shaoul C; Lin D
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Aug; 49(4):1503-1519. PubMed ID: 27734329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Chinese Lexicon Project: a repository of lexical decision behavioral responses for 2,500 Chinese characters.
    Sze WP; Rickard Liow SJ; Yap MJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Mar; 46(1):263-73. PubMed ID: 23813237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Chinese Lexicon Project II: A megastudy of speeded naming performance for 25,000+ traditional Chinese two-character words.
    Tse CS; Chan YL; Yap MJ; Tsang HC
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):4382-4402. PubMed ID: 36443581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MEGALEX: A megastudy of visual and auditory word recognition.
    Ferrand L; Méot A; Spinelli E; New B; Pallier C; Bonin P; Dufau S; Mathôt S; Grainger J
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Jun; 50(3):1285-1307. PubMed ID: 28791657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual differences in Cantonese Chinese word recognition: Insights from the Chinese Lexicon Project.
    Lim RY; Yap MJ; Tse CS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Apr; 73(4):504-518. PubMed ID: 32019427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of lexical variables in the visual recognition of two-character Chinese compound words: A megastudy analysis.
    Tse CS; Yap MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Sep; 71(9):2022-2038. PubMed ID: 30117382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An ERP megastudy of Chinese word recognition.
    Tsang YK; Zou Y
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Nov; 59(11):e14111. PubMed ID: 35609148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MELD-SCH: A megastudy of lexical decision in simplified Chinese.
    Tsang YK; Huang J; Lui M; Xue M; Chan YF; Wang S; Chen HC
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Oct; 50(5):1763-1777. PubMed ID: 28779457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Practice effects in large-scale visual word recognition studies: a lexical decision study on 14,000 dutch mono- and disyllabic words and nonwords.
    Keuleers E; Diependaele K; Brysbaert M
    Front Psychol; 2010; 1():174. PubMed ID: 21833236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Familiarity ratings for 24,325 simplified Chinese words.
    Su Y; Li Y; Li H
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Apr; 55(3):1496-1509. PubMed ID: 35668341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Calgary semantic decision project: concrete/abstract decision data for 10,000 English words.
    Pexman PM; Heard A; Lloyd E; Yap MJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Apr; 49(2):407-417. PubMed ID: 26944579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of lexical variables in the visual recognition of Chinese characters: A megastudy analysis.
    Sze WP; Yap MJ; Rickard Liow SJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(8):1541-70. PubMed ID: 25622522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing word recognition in simplified and traditional Chinese: A megastudy approach.
    Tsang YK; Huang J; Wang S; Wang J; Wong AW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Mar; 77(3):593-610. PubMed ID: 37154615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of semantic transparency in visual word recognition of compound words: A megastudy approach.
    Kim SY; Yap MJ; Goh WD
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Dec; 51(6):2722-2732. PubMed ID: 30291593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A psycholinguistic database for traditional Chinese character naming.
    Chang YN; Hsu CH; Tsai JL; Chen CL; Lee CY
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Mar; 48(1):112-22. PubMed ID: 25630311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A database of 629 English compound words: ratings of familiarity, lexeme meaning dominance, semantic transparency, age of acquisition, imageability, and sensory experience.
    Juhasz BJ; Lai YH; Woodcock ML
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Dec; 47(4):1004-1019. PubMed ID: 25361864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Examining word processing via a megastudy of conditional reading aloud.
    Cortese MJ; Yates M; Schock J; Vilks L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Nov; 71(11):2295-2313. PubMed ID: 30362414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The French Lexicon Project: lexical decision data for 38,840 French words and 38,840 pseudowords.
    Ferrand L; New B; Brysbaert M; Keuleers E; Bonin P; Méot A; Augustinova M; Pallier C
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 May; 42(2):488-96. PubMed ID: 20479180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Responding to nonwords in the lexical decision task: Insights from the English Lexicon Project.
    Yap MJ; Sibley DE; Balota DA; Ratcliff R; Rueckl J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):597-613. PubMed ID: 25329078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of word prevalence on lexical decision times: Evidence from the Dutch Lexicon Project 2.
    Brysbaert M; Stevens M; Mandera P; Keuleers E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Mar; 42(3):441-58. PubMed ID: 26501839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.