BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27734422)

  • 1. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Stones Smaller Than 2 cm: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Javanmard B; Kashi AH; Mazloomfard MM; Ansari Jafari A; Arefanian S
    Urol J; 2016 Oct; 13(5):2823-2828. PubMed ID: 27734422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retrograde intrarenal surgery vs extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for intermediate size inferior pole calculi: a prospective assessment of objective and subjective outcomes.
    Singh BP; Prakash J; Sankhwar SN; Dhakad U; Sankhwar PL; Goel A; Kumar M
    Urology; 2014 May; 83(5):1016-22. PubMed ID: 24560970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of stone-free rates following shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Chung DY; Kang DH; Cho KS; Jeong WS; Jung HD; Kwon JK; Lee SH; Lee JY
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211316. PubMed ID: 30789937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of large pediatric renal pelvic stone burden more than 2 cm.
    Mohamed ER; Elmogazy HM; Zanaty AK; Elsharkawi AM; Riad AM; Badawy AA
    J Pediatr Urol; 2023 Oct; 19(5):561.e1-561.e11. PubMed ID: 37414650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment of Moderate Sized Renal Pelvis Calculi: Stone Clearance Time Comparison of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.
    Ercil H; Alma E; Bas O; Sener NC; Vuruskan E; Kuyucu F; Unal U; Gören MR; Evliyaoglu Y
    Urol J; 2016 Mar; 13(1):2490-5. PubMed ID: 26945652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy.
    Kruck S; Anastasiadis AG; Herrmann TR; Walcher U; Abdelhafez MF; Nicklas AP; Hölzle L; Schilling D; Bedke J; Stenzl A; Nagele U
    World J Urol; 2013 Dec; 31(6):1555-61. PubMed ID: 23064981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery, shockwave lithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of medium-sized radiolucent renal stones.
    Resorlu B; Unsal A; Ziypak T; Diri A; Atis G; Guven S; Sancaktutar AA; Tepeler A; Bozkurt OF; Oztuna D
    World J Urol; 2013 Dec; 31(6):1581-6. PubMed ID: 23179732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, Standard and Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for the Management of 1-2cm Renal Stones.
    Wymer KM; Sharma V; Juvet T; Klett DE; Borah BJ; Koo K; Rivera M; Agarwal D; Humphreys MR; Potretzke AM
    Urology; 2021 Oct; 156():71-77. PubMed ID: 34274389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Residual Stone Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Shockwave Lithotripsy
    Danilovic A; Torricelli FCM; Marchini GS; Batagello C; Vicentini FC; Traxer O; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E
    J Endourol; 2021 May; 35(5):609-614. PubMed ID: 33096975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Versus Shockwave Lithotripsy for Kidney Stones ≤2 cm: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Bosio A; Alessandria E; Dalmasso E; Agosti S; Vitiello F; Vercelli E; Bisconti A; Gontero P
    Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Nov; 8(6):1816-1822. PubMed ID: 35466071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones.
    Donaldson JF; Lardas M; Scrimgeour D; Stewart F; MacLennan S; Lam TB; McClinton S
    Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):612-6. PubMed ID: 25449204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does Previous Failed Shockwave Lithotripsy Treatment Have an Influence on Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Outcome?
    Selmi V; Sarı S; Çakıcı MÇ; Özdemir H; Kartal İG; Özok HU; İmamoğlu MA
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 May; 29(5):627-630. PubMed ID: 30418090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The best treatment approach for lower calyceal stones ≤20 mm in maximal diameter: mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery or shock wave lithotripsy. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature conducted by the European Section of Uro-Technology and Young Academic Urologists.
    Kallidonis P; Adamou C; Ntasiotis P; Pietropaolo A; Somani B; Özsoy M; Liourdi D; Sarica K; Liatsikos E; Tailly T
    Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2021 Dec; 73(6):711-723. PubMed ID: 34156200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Which is the best treatment of pediatric upper urinary tract stones among extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review.
    He Q; Xiao K; Chen Y; Liao B; Li H; Wang K
    BMC Urol; 2019 Oct; 19(1):98. PubMed ID: 31640693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) in the treatment of symptomatic lower pole renal stones (LPSs) after the failure of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).
    Fan J; Zhang T; Zhu W; Gurioli A; Ketegwe IR; Zeng G
    Urolithiasis; 2019 Jun; 47(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 29947994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between retrograde intrarenal surgery and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole kidney stones up to 15 mm. Prospective, randomized study.
    Vilches RM; Aliaga A; Reyes D; Sepulveda F; Mercado A; Moya F; Ledezma R; Hidalgo JP; Olmedo T; Marchant F
    Actas Urol Esp; 2015 May; 39(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 25435403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery on health-related quality of life in 10-20 mm renal stones: a prospective randomized pilot study.
    Atis G; Culpan M; Ucar T; Sendogan F; Kazan HO; Yildirim A
    Urolithiasis; 2021 Jun; 49(3):247-253. PubMed ID: 33074423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
    Zhang W; Zhou T; Wu T; Gao X; Peng Y; Xu C; Chen Q; Song R; Sun Y
    J Endourol; 2015 Jul; 29(7):745-59. PubMed ID: 25531986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.
    Dogan HS; Altan M; Citamak B; Bozaci AC; Karabulut E; Tekgul S
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):84.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25812469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy, shock wave lithotripsy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi 10-20 mm.
    Ozturk U; Sener NC; Goktug HN; Nalbant I; Gucuk A; Imamoglu MA
    Urol Int; 2013; 91(3):345-9. PubMed ID: 23816573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.