These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27734753)

  • 1. Listeners learn phonotactic patterns conditioned on suprasegmental cues.
    White KS; Chambers KE; Miller Z; Jethava V
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Dec; 70(12):2560-2576. PubMed ID: 27734753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Finding patterns and learning words: Infant phonotactic knowledge is associated with vocabulary size.
    Graf Estes K; Gluck SC; Grimm KJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Jun; 146():34-49. PubMed ID: 26905502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A vowel is a vowel: generalizing newly learned phonotactic constraints to new contexts.
    Chambers KE; Onishi KH; Fisher C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):821-8. PubMed ID: 20438279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phonotactic knowledge of word boundaries and its use in infant speech perception.
    Friederici AD; Wessels JM
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Sep; 54(3):287-95. PubMed ID: 8414887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implicit processing of phonotactic cues: evidence from electrophysiological and vascular responses.
    Rossi S; Jürgenson IB; Hanulíková A; Telkemeyer S; Wartenburger I; Obrig H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jul; 23(7):1752-64. PubMed ID: 20666594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Suprasegmental lexical stress cues in visual speech can guide spoken-word recognition.
    Jesse A; McQueen JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):793-808. PubMed ID: 24134065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling the contribution of phonotactic cues to the problem of word segmentation.
    Blanchard D; Heinz J; Golinkoff R
    J Child Lang; 2010 Jun; 37(3):487-511. PubMed ID: 20307346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phonotactic regularities in the segmentation of spoken Italian.
    Tagliapietra L; Fanari R; De Candia C; Tabossi P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):392-415. PubMed ID: 18609378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of prior phonotactic knowledge on infant word segmentation: the case of nonadjacent dependencies.
    Gonzalez-Gomez N; Nazzi T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Jun; 56(3):840-9. PubMed ID: 23275409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of word learning on the perception of non-native consonant sequences.
    Davidson L; Shaw J; Adams T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3697-709. PubMed ID: 18247777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning about sounds contributes to learning about words: effects of prosody and phonotactics on infant word learning.
    Graf Estes K; Bowen S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Mar; 114(3):405-17. PubMed ID: 23177349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influences of vowel and tone variation on emergent word knowledge: a cross-linguistic investigation.
    Singh L; Hui TJ; Chan C; Golinkoff RM
    Dev Sci; 2014 Jan; 17(1):94-109. PubMed ID: 24118787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence For Selective Adaptation and Recalibration in the Perception of Lexical Stress.
    Bosker HR
    Lang Speech; 2022 Jun; 65(2):472-490. PubMed ID: 34227417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of consolidation in learning context-dependent phonotactic patterns in speech and digital sequence production.
    Anderson ND; Dell GS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Apr; 115(14):3617-3622. PubMed ID: 29555766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gradient phonological inconsistency affects vocabulary learning.
    Muench KL; Creel SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1585-600. PubMed ID: 23647379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phonological processes and the perception of phonotactically illegal consonant clusters.
    Pitt MA
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Aug; 60(6):941-51. PubMed ID: 9718954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New phonotactic constraints learned implicitly by producing syllable strings generalize to the production of new syllables.
    Warker JA; Dell GS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1902-10. PubMed ID: 26030628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship between language production and verbal short-term memory: the role of stress grouping.
    Morgan JL; Edwards S; Wheeldon LR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Feb; 67(2):220-46. PubMed ID: 23745759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phonological Learning Influences Label-Object Mapping in Toddlers.
    Breen E; Pomper R; Saffran J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 62(6):1923-1932. PubMed ID: 31170356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Novel phonotactic learning by children and infants: Generalizing syllable-position but not co-occurrence regularities.
    Bernard A; Onishi KH
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2023 Jan; 225():105493. PubMed ID: 36007352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.