These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27734973)

  • 41. Sampling frequency dependent visibility graphlet approach to time series.
    Wang Y; Weng T; Deng S; Gu C; Yang H
    Chaos; 2019 Feb; 29(2):023109. PubMed ID: 30823737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Dynamic patterns of information flow in complex networks.
    Harush U; Barzel B
    Nat Commun; 2017 Dec; 8(1):2181. PubMed ID: 29259160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Encoding edge type information in graphlets.
    Jia M; Van Alboom M; Goubert L; Bracke P; Gabrys B; Musial K
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0273609. PubMed ID: 36026434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Controllability of flow-conservation networks.
    Zhao C; Zeng A; Jiang R; Yuan Z; Wang WX
    Phys Rev E; 2017 Jul; 96(1-1):012314. PubMed ID: 29347124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. L-GRAAL: Lagrangian graphlet-based network aligner.
    Malod-Dognin N; Pržulj N
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jul; 31(13):2182-9. PubMed ID: 25725498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparative network analysis via differential graphlet communities.
    Wong SW; Cercone N; Jurisica I
    Proteomics; 2015 Jan; 15(2-3):608-17. PubMed ID: 25283527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Graphlet-based measures are suitable for biological network comparison.
    Hayes W; Sun K; Pržulj N
    Bioinformatics; 2013 Feb; 29(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 23349212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Graphlet signature-based scoring method to estimate protein-ligand binding affinity.
    Singh O; Sawariya K; Aparoy P
    R Soc Open Sci; 2014 Dec; 1(4):140306. PubMed ID: 26064572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Core-periphery structure in sectoral international trade networks: A new approach to an old theory.
    Kostoska O; Mitikj S; Jovanovski P; Kocarev L
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0229547. PubMed ID: 32240201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Structural and functional analyses of microbial metabolic networks reveal novel insights into genome-scale metabolic fluxes.
    Li G; Cao H; Xu Y
    Brief Bioinform; 2019 Jul; 20(4):1590-1603. PubMed ID: 29596572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Measuring the effect of distance on the network topology of the Global Container Shipping Network.
    Tsiotas D; Ducruet C
    Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):21250. PubMed ID: 34711863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Reconciling contrasting views on economic complexity.
    Sciarra C; Chiarotti G; Ridolfi L; Laio F
    Nat Commun; 2020 Jul; 11(1):3352. PubMed ID: 32620815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. GraphCrunch 2: Software tool for network modeling, alignment and clustering.
    Kuchaiev O; Stevanović A; Hayes W; Pržulj N
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Jan; 12():24. PubMed ID: 21244715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparing methods for comparing networks.
    Tantardini M; Ieva F; Tajoli L; Piccardi C
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):17557. PubMed ID: 31772246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Combinatorial algorithm for counting small induced graphs and orbits.
    Hočevar T; Demšar J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171428. PubMed ID: 28182743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Framework based on communicability and flow to analyze complex network dynamics.
    Gilson M; Kouvaris NE; Deco G; Zamora-López G
    Phys Rev E; 2018 May; 97(5-1):052301. PubMed ID: 29906867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Robust structure measures of metabolic networks that predict prokaryotic optimal growth temperature.
    Weber Zendrera A; Sokolovska N; Soula HA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Oct; 20(1):499. PubMed ID: 31615420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Advancing interdisciplinary science for disrupting wildlife trafficking networks.
    Gore ML; Griffin E; Dilkina B; Ferber A; Griffis SE; Keskin BB; Macdonald J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Mar; 120(10):e2208268120. PubMed ID: 36848572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Risks, prices, and positions: A social network analysis of illegal drug trafficking in the world-economy.
    Boivin R
    Int J Drug Policy; 2014 Mar; 25(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 24418633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Exploring biological network structure with clustered random networks.
    Bansal S; Khandelwal S; Meyers LA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Dec; 10():405. PubMed ID: 20003212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.