These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27736722)

  • 1. The use of a static measure to predict foot posture at midstance during walking.
    McPoil TG; Ford J; Fundaun J; Gallegos C; Kinney A; McMillan P; Murphy J; Sky E; Torba D; Bade M
    Foot (Edinb); 2016 Aug; 28():47-53. PubMed ID: 27736722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. THE USE OF A STATIC MEASURE TO PREDICT FOOT POSTURE AT MIDSUPPORT DURING RUNNING.
    Bade MB; Chi TL; Farrell KC; Gresl AJ; Hammel LJ; Koster BN; Leatzow AB; Thomas EC; McPoil TG
    Int J Sports Phys Ther; 2016 Feb; 11(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 26900501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Toe flexor strength is associated with mobility in older adults with pronated and supinated feet but not with neutral feet.
    Kusagawa Y; Kurihara T; Imai A; Maeo S; Sugiyama T; Kanehisa H; Isaka T
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2020 Sep; 13(1):55. PubMed ID: 32912250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Kinematics reduction applied to the comparison of highly-pronated, normal and highly-supinated feet during walking.
    Sanchis-Sales E; Rodríguez-Cervantes PJ; Sancho-Bru JL
    Gait Posture; 2019 Feb; 68():269-273. PubMed ID: 30551052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction of dynamic foot posture during running using the longitudinal arch angle.
    McPoil TG; Cornwall MW
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2007; 97(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 17369315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of the longitudinal arch angle to predict dynamic foot posture in walking.
    McPoil TG; Cornwall MW
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2005; 95(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 15778468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do foot orthoses replicate the static longitudinal arch angle during midstance in walking?
    Burn H; Branthwaite H; Chockalingam N; Chevalier TL; Naemi R
    Foot (Edinb); 2011 Sep; 21(3):129-32. PubMed ID: 21251808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationships between the foot posture Index and static as well as dynamic rear foot and arch variables.
    Behling AV; Nigg BM
    J Biomech; 2020 Jan; 98():109448. PubMed ID: 31677779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of foot muscle morphology and foot kinematics between recreational runners with normal feet and with asymptomatic over-pronated feet.
    Zhang X; Aeles J; Vanwanseele B
    Gait Posture; 2017 May; 54():290-294. PubMed ID: 28390293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of static foot posture on the dynamic stiffness of foot joints during walking.
    Sanchis-Sales E; Sancho-Bru JL; Roda-Sales A; Pascual-Huerta J
    Gait Posture; 2018 May; 62():241-246. PubMed ID: 29574363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical measures of hip and foot-ankle mechanics as predictors of rearfoot motion and posture.
    Souza TR; Mancini MC; Araújo VL; Carvalhais VO; Ocarino JM; Silva PL; Fonseca ST
    Man Ther; 2014 Oct; 19(5):379-85. PubMed ID: 24268425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The ability to predict dynamic foot posture from static measurements.
    Franettovich MM; McPoil TG; Russell T; Skardoon G; Vicenzino B
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2007; 97(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 17369317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perspectives for clinical measures of dynamic foot function-reference data and methodological considerations.
    Rathleff MS; Nielsen RG; Simonsen O; Olesen CG; Kersting UG
    Gait Posture; 2010 Feb; 31(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 19896851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of foot morphology on center-of-pressure excursion during barefoot walking.
    Wong L; Hunt A; Burns J; Crosbie J
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2008; 98(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 18347119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Between-day reliability of a cluster-based method for multisegment kinematic analysis of the foot-ankle complex.
    Souza TR; Fonseca HL; Vaz AC; Antero JS; Marinho CS; Fonseca ST
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2014 Nov; 104(6):601-9. PubMed ID: 25514272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Initial effects of anti-pronation tape on the medial longitudinal arch during walking and running.
    Vicenzino B; Franettovich M; McPoil T; Russell T; Skardoon G
    Br J Sports Med; 2005 Dec; 39(12):939-43; discussion 943. PubMed ID: 16306503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationships between clinical measures of static foot posture and plantar pressure during static standing and walking.
    Jonely H; Brismée JM; Sizer PS; James CR
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Oct; 26(8):873-9. PubMed ID: 21632159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of different structural foot types for measures of standing postural control.
    Tsai LC; Yu B; Mercer VS; Gross MT
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2006 Dec; 36(12):942-53. PubMed ID: 17193872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Non-linear analysis of the structure of variability in midfoot kinematics.
    Rathleff MS; Olesen CG; Moelgaard CM; Jensen K; Madeleine P; Olesen JL
    Gait Posture; 2010 Mar; 31(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 20129787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Plantar pressure platform as clinical assesment tool in the analysis of foot posture with the foot posture index].
    Gijon-Nogueron G; Lopezosa-Reca E; Cervera-Marin JA; Martinez-Nova A; Sanchez-Rodriguez R; Van Alsenoy K; De Schepper J
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2014 Feb; 152(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 24578117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.