These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2773696)

  • 1. [Variation of intraocular pressure by non-contact tonometry and cardiac pulse wave].
    Nanba K; Nakayama T; Iwata K
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Feb; 93(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 2773696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Non-contact tonometry synchronized with cardiac rhythm and its relationship with blood pressure.
    Queirós A; González-Méijome JM; Fernandes P; Jorge J; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Jul; 26(4):384-91. PubMed ID: 16792738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intra-eye pressure range and pulse profiles in normals with the Pulsair non-contact tonometer.
    Vernon SA
    Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():134-7. PubMed ID: 8325403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The American Optical non-contact tonometer and its results compared with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (author's transl)].
    Derka H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1980 Nov; 177(5):634-42. PubMed ID: 7253520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude using dynamic contour tonometry and contact lens tonometry.
    Hoffmann EM; Grus FH; Pfeiffer N
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 4():4. PubMed ID: 15038831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the Pascal dynamic contour, Canon TX-10 non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometers in healthy subjects.
    Pelit A; Altan-Yaycioglu R; Pelit A; Akova YA
    Clin Exp Optom; 2009 Jan; 92(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 18637107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of the pascal dynamic contour tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure in keratoconic eyes.
    Papastergiou GI; Kozobolis V; Siganos DS
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):484-8. PubMed ID: 18794685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus a transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01"PRA" in glaucoma patients].
    Schlote T; Landenberger H
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Feb; 222(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 15719316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Intraocular pressure measurements with the Proview self-tonometer in comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes].
    Meyer MW; Yevelenko V; Hoy L; Meyer A; Erb C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Nov; 223(11):899-903. PubMed ID: 17131250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ocular pulse amplitude measurement using pascal dynamic contour tonometer in glaucoma patients.
    Katsimpris JM; Theoulakis PE; Papadopoulos GE; Katsimpris A; Lepidas J; Petropoulos IK
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2014 Apr; 231(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 24771168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intraocular pressure and pulse rate measurements by the OBF tonograph--comparison to reference instruments.
    Yang YC; Illango B; Cook A; Batterbury M
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 Sep; 20(5):401-7. PubMed ID: 11045249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of tonometry with the Keeler air puff non-contact tonometer "Pulsair" and the Goldmann applanation tonometer].
    Yücel AA; Stürmer J; Gloor B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1990 Oct; 197(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 2280569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraocular pressure asymmetry in a population tested with the Pulsair non-contact tonometer.
    Vernon SA; Jones SJ
    Eye (Lond); 1991; 5 ( Pt 6)():674-7. PubMed ID: 1800165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Applanation tonometry in silicone hydrogel contact lens wearers.
    Allen RJ; Dev Borman A; Saleh GM
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Dec; 30(5):267-9. PubMed ID: 17382579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraocular pressure measured with Goldmann, noncontact, Schiøtz, and dynamic contour tonometry after DSEK.
    Yi K; Bae G; Kong M; Chung ES
    Cornea; 2013 Aug; 32(8):1089-93. PubMed ID: 23538628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability.
    Tonnu PA; Ho T; Sharma K; White E; Bunce C; Garway-Heath D
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jul; 89(7):847-50. PubMed ID: 15965164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Corneal biomechanical properties: precision and influence on tonometry.
    Ogbuehi KC; Osuagwu UL
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Jun; 37(3):124-31. PubMed ID: 24121009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of invasive and non-invasive tonometry in the mouse.
    Morris CA; Crowston JG; Lindsey JD; Danias J; Weinreb RN
    Exp Eye Res; 2006 Jun; 82(6):1094-9. PubMed ID: 16466714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers.
    Ko YC; Liu CJ; Hsu WM
    Eye (Lond); 2005 Mar; 19(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 15258603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Effect of tonometry on a glaucoma population study].
    Katsushima H; Sone A; Takeda A; Okazaki H; Adachi J; Funahashi K; Maruyama I
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Mar; 106(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 11925950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.