These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

48 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 277373)

  • 1. [The most frequent errors in cephalometric tracing].
    Crétot M
    Chir Dent Fr; 1977 Jan; 47(335):93-7. PubMed ID: 277373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Tracing and measuring errors in the roentgenographic cephalometry].
    Erdem A; Ceylan I; Deniz E
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):274-80. PubMed ID: 2489159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of the errors in cephalometric measurements on scanned cephalometric images and conventional tracings.
    Sayinsu K; Isik F; Trakyali G; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Feb; 29(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 17290023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The more frequent mistakes in cephalometric training].
    Cretot M
    Riv Ital Stomatol; 1977 Nov; 46():52-9. PubMed ID: 278131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgical cephalometric prediction tracing for the alteration of the occlusal plane by means of rotation of the maxillomandibular complex.
    Reyneke JP
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 10337251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of digital and analogue cephalometric measurements assessed with the sandwich technique.
    Santoro M; Jarjoura K; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):345-51. PubMed ID: 16527629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional fetal cephalometry: an evaluation of the reliability of cephalometric measurements based on three-dimensional CT reconstructions and on dry skulls of sheep fetuses.
    Papadopoulos MA; Jannowitz C; Boettcher P; Henke J; Stolla R; Zeilhofer HF; Kovacs L; Erhardt W; Biemer E; Papadopulos NA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Aug; 33(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 15978824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Cephalometric analysis in acromegalic patients].
    Martucci E; Chimenti C; Scopelliti D; Rocco A; Capriati F
    Dent Cadmos; 1989 Feb; 57(3):78-85. PubMed ID: 2636167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of training and experience on cephalometric measurement errors on surgical patients.
    Lau PY; Cooke MS; Hägg U
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1997; 12(3):204-13. PubMed ID: 9511491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cephalometric analysis for the surgeon.
    Grayson BH
    Clin Plast Surg; 1989 Oct; 16(4):633-44. PubMed ID: 2805576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Execution of simplified cephalometric tracing according to the Cagliari school].
    Tenti FV
    Mondo Ortod; 1978; 3(3):14-6. PubMed ID: 283305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-aided cephalometric tracing and analysis.
    Morgan R
    Funct Orthod; 1992; 9(1):15-7, 19-20. PubMed ID: 1452044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis.
    Celik E; Polat-Ozsoy O; Toygar Memikoglu TU
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 19237509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of computer-generated cephalometrics.
    Nimkarn Y; Miles PG
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 9081992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Use of the perpendicular vertical in cephalometric analysis].
    Carano A
    Mondo Ortod; 1991; 16(5):581-92. PubMed ID: 1784292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in cephalometric measurements: a comparison of digital versus hand-tracing methods.
    Polat-Ozsoy O; Gokcelik A; Toygar Memikoglu TU
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 19349417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calibrated double split cast simulations for orthognathic surgery.
    Ehmer U; Rohling J; Dorr K; Becker R
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1989; 4(4):223-7. PubMed ID: 2484174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses.
    Uysal T; Baysal A; Yagci A
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 19443692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Facial anthropometrics versus cephalometry as predictors for surgical treatment in patients with Class III dentofacial deformities.
    Magalhaes AE; Stella JP; Epker BN
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(4):295-302. PubMed ID: 9082019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Adaptable and portable cephalometric devices: a new method in obtaining cephalometrics].
    Biurrun O; Morello A; Roca J; Barberá JA; Rodríguez-Roisín R; Traserra J
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1995; 46(4):293-7. PubMed ID: 7546855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.