These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2773769)

  • 1. Success rate versus defibrillation energy: temporal profile and the most efficient defibrillation threshold.
    Murakawa Y; Gliner BE; Thakor NV
    Am Heart J; 1989 Sep; 118(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 2773769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of an unsuccessful subthreshold shock on the energy requirement for the subsequent defibrillation.
    Murakawa Y; Gliner BE; Shankar B; Thakor NV
    Am Heart J; 1989 May; 117(5):1065-9. PubMed ID: 2711966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relationship between successful defibrillation and delivered energy in open-chest dogs: reappraisal of the "defibrillation threshold" concept.
    Davy JM; Fain ES; Dorian P; Winkle RA
    Am Heart J; 1987 Jan; 113(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 3799444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The defibrillation threshold: a comparison of anesthetics and measurement methods.
    Gill RM; Sweeney RJ; Reid PR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Apr; 16(4 Pt 1):708-14. PubMed ID: 7683796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of duration of ventricular fibrillation on defibrillation efficacy in humans.
    Winkle RA; Mead RH; Ruder MA; Smith NA; Buch WS; Gaudiani VA
    Circulation; 1990 May; 81(5):1477-81. PubMed ID: 2331763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pericardial effusion increases defibrillation energy requirement.
    Thakur RK; Souza JJ; Troup PJ; Chapman PD; Wetherbee JN
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Jun; 16(6):1227-30. PubMed ID: 7686649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of multiple shocks on canine cardiac defibrillation.
    Flaker G; Schuder J; McDaniel W
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Dec; 13(12 Pt 1):1580-4. PubMed ID: 1704508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The defibrillation success rate versus energy relationship: Part I--Curve fitting and the most efficient defibrillation energy.
    Gliner BE; Murakawa Y; Thakor NV
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Mar; 13(3):326-38. PubMed ID: 1690405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fourier analysis of ventricular fibrillation and synchronization of DC countershocks in defibrillation.
    Carlisle EJ; Allen JD; Bailey A; Kernohan WG; Anderson J; Adgey AA
    J Electrocardiol; 1988 Nov; 21(4):337-43. PubMed ID: 3241145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of ventricular fibrillation duration on defibrillation energy in dogs using bidirectional pulse discharges.
    Echt DS; Barbey JT; Black JN
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 Sep; 11(9):1315-23. PubMed ID: 2460837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Double-pulse defibrillation using pulse separation based on the fibrillation cycle length.
    Sweeney RJ; Gill RM; Reid PR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1994 Sep; 5(9):761-70. PubMed ID: 7827715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acute effects of intravenous propafenone on the internal ventricular defibrillation threshold in the anesthetized dog.
    Peters W; Gang ES; Okazaki H; Solingen S; Kobayashi Y; Karagueuzian HS; Mandel WJ
    Am Heart J; 1991 Nov; 122(5):1355-60. PubMed ID: 1951000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of flecainide on defibrillation thresholds in the anesthetized dog.
    Hernandez R; Mann DE; Breckinridge S; Williams GR; Reiter MJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1989 Sep; 14(3):777-81. PubMed ID: 2504799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Epicardial versus parietal pericardial defibrillation.
    Rubin L; Hudson P
    Am J Emerg Med; 1985 Mar; 3(2):160-4. PubMed ID: 3970772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of transesophageal defibrillation in ventricular fibrillation of long duration.
    Mischke K; Schimpf T; Knackstedt C; Eickholt C; Hanrath P; Kelm M; Schauerte P
    Am J Emerg Med; 2008 Mar; 26(3):287-90. PubMed ID: 18358938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ventricular defibrillation with myocardial electrodes in the dog, calf, pony, and pig.
    Gold JH; Schuder JC; Stoeckle H
    Med Instrum; 1980; 14(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7354731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rapidly switching multidirectional defibrillation: reversal of ventricular fibrillation with lower energy shocks.
    Viana MA; Bassani RA; Petrucci O; Marques DA; Bassani JW
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Dec; 148(6):3213-8. PubMed ID: 25173125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved internal defibrillation success with shocks timed to the morphology electrogram.
    Hsu W; Lin Y; Lang DJ; Jones JL
    Circulation; 1998 Aug; 98(8):808-12. PubMed ID: 9727552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of pulse separation between two sequential biphasic shocks given over different lead configurations on ventricular defibrillation efficacy.
    Johnson EE; Alferness CA; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1992 Jun; 85(6):2267-74. PubMed ID: 1591840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Overlapping sequential pulses. A new waveform for transthoracic defibrillation.
    Kerber RE; Spencer KT; Kallok MJ; Birkett C; Smith R; Yoerger D; Kieso RA
    Circulation; 1994 May; 89(5):2369-79. PubMed ID: 8181163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.