These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27738524)

  • 21. Adaptive threshold hunting for the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex inhibition.
    Mooney RA; Cirillo J; Byblow WD
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jun; 236(6):1651-1663. PubMed ID: 29610948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cortical priming strategies for gait training after stroke: a controlled, stratified trial.
    Madhavan S; Cleland BT; Sivaramakrishnan A; Freels S; Lim H; Testai FD; Corcos DM
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Aug; 17(1):111. PubMed ID: 32799922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke - Motor excitability and motor function.
    Yasaroglu S; Liepert J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2022 Dec; 144():16-22. PubMed ID: 36208617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced corticomotor excitability and associated motor skill acquisition in chronic stroke.
    Kim YH; You SH; Ko MH; Park JW; Lee KH; Jang SH; Yoo WK; Hallett M
    Stroke; 2006 Jun; 37(6):1471-6. PubMed ID: 16675743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Absence of a Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Induced Lower Limb Corticomotor Response Does Not Affect Walking Speed in Chronic Stroke Survivors.
    Sivaramakrishnan A; Madhavan S
    Stroke; 2018 Aug; 49(8):2004-2007. PubMed ID: 29986928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intensity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability in chronic spinal cord injury.
    Murray LM; Edwards DJ; Ruffini G; Labar D; Stampas A; Pascual-Leone A; Cortes M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Apr; 96(4 Suppl):S114-21. PubMed ID: 25461825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of transcranial stimulation on paretic lower limb motor excitability during walking.
    Jayaram G; Stinear JW
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Aug; 26(4):272-9. PubMed ID: 19584748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to the non-lesioned hemisphere improves paretic arm reach-to-grasp performance after chronic stroke.
    Tretriluxana J; Kantak S; Tretriluxana S; Wu AD; Fisher BE
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2013 Mar; 8(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 23244391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The association of motor imagery and kinesthetic illusion prolongs the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal tract excitability.
    Kaneko F; Shibata E; Hayami T; Nagahata K; Aoyama T
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Apr; 13():36. PubMed ID: 27079199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Facilitation of corticospinal excitability by virtual reality exercise following anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy volunteers and subacute stroke subjects.
    Kim YJ; Ku J; Cho S; Kim HJ; Cho YK; Lim T; Kang YJ
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Aug; 11():124. PubMed ID: 25135003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Single Sessions of High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Do Not Alter Lower Extremity Biomechanical or Corticomotor Response Variables Post-stroke.
    Kindred JH; Kautz SA; Wonsetler EC; Bowden MG
    Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():286. PubMed ID: 31031579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. rTMS combined with task-oriented training to improve symmetry of interhemispheric corticomotor excitability and gait performance after stroke: a randomized trial.
    Wang RY; Tseng HY; Liao KK; Wang CJ; Lai KL; Yang YR
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2012; 26(3):222-30. PubMed ID: 21974983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Combining theta burst stimulation with training after subcortical stroke.
    Ackerley SJ; Stinear CM; Barber PA; Byblow WD
    Stroke; 2010 Jul; 41(7):1568-72. PubMed ID: 20489170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of chronic antidepressant use on neurophysiological responses to tDCS post-stroke.
    Li X; Morton SM
    Neurosci Lett; 2020 Jan; 717():134723. PubMed ID: 31881255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Downregulating Aberrant Motor Evoked Potential Synergies of the Lower Extremity Post Stroke During TMS of the Contralesional Hemisphere.
    Tan AQ; Shemmell J; Dhaher YY
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(3):396-405. PubMed ID: 26927733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Robotic-assisted gait training combined with transcranial direct current stimulation in chronic stroke patients: A pilot double-blind, randomized controlled trial.
    Seo HG; Lee WH; Lee SH; Yi Y; Kim KD; Oh BM
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2017; 35(5):527-536. PubMed ID: 28800341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation to Enhance Post-Stroke Recovery.
    Kubis N
    Front Neural Circuits; 2016; 10():56. PubMed ID: 27512367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Functional connectivity of proximal and distal lower limb muscles and impact on gait variability in stroke.
    Lim H; Cleland B; Madhavan S
    Gait Posture; 2023 Jan; 99():20-23. PubMed ID: 36327534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Primary Motor Cortex Excitability During Recovery After Stroke: Implications for Neuromodulation.
    Stinear CM; Petoe MA; Byblow WD
    Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(6):1183-90. PubMed ID: 26195321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interaction between simultaneously applied neuromodulatory interventions in humans.
    Schabrun SM; Chipchase LS; Zipf N; Thickbroom GW; Hodges PW
    Brain Stimul; 2013 Jul; 6(4):624-30. PubMed ID: 23088854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.