These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2773861)

  • 1. Orthopedic and orthodontic effects resulting from the use of a functional appliance with different amounts of protrusive activation.
    DeVincenzo JP; Winn MW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Sep; 96(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 2773861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A cephalometric comparison of bony profile changes in Class II, division 1 patients treated with extraoral force and functional jaw orthopedics.
    Meach CL
    Am J Orthod; 1966 May; 52(5):353-70. PubMed ID: 4951436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of activator treatment on Class II, division 1 malocclusion.
    Chang HF; Wu KM; Chen KC; Cheng MC
    J Clin Orthod; 1989 Aug; 23(8):560-3. PubMed ID: 2639151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    McNamara JA; Howe RP; Dischinger TG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):134-44. PubMed ID: 2378319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of the morphogenic and anatomic effects of the functional regulator utilizing the counterpart analysis.
    Enlow DH; DiGangi D; McNamara JA; Mina M
    Eur J Orthod; 1988 Aug; 10(3):192-202. PubMed ID: 3181298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Facial changes in children treated with the Activator appliance: a lateral cephalometric study.
    Mamandras AH; D'Aloisio DR; Lenizky RJ
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1989 Sep; 55(9):727-30. PubMed ID: 2676117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bionator treatment in Class II, division 1.
    Bolmgren GA; Moshiri F
    Angle Orthod; 1986 Jul; 56(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 3461735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatment of Class II malocclusions with removable appliances. Part 3. Functional appliance therapy.
    Rock WP
    Br Dent J; 1990 Mar; 168(6):253-6. PubMed ID: 2322491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of the amount of protrusion built into the bionator on condylar growth and displacement: a clinical study.
    Op Heij DG; Callaert H; Opdebeeck HM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 May; 95(5):401-9. PubMed ID: 2718970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Removable appliances for Class II].
    Chateau M; Le Gall Y
    Rev Orthop Dento Faciale; 1975 Apr; 9(2):129-42. PubMed ID: 1078103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical relevance of step-by-step mandibular advancement in the treatment of mandibular retrusion using the Fränkel appliance.
    Falck F; Fränkel R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Oct; 96(4):333-41. PubMed ID: 2801639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical application of the Fränkel appliance. Case reports.
    Owen AH
    Angle Orthod; 1983 Jan; 53(1):29-88. PubMed ID: 6573864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correction of Class II, Division 2 malocclusions through the use of the Bionator appliance. Report of two cases.
    Rutter RR; Witt E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Feb; 97(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 2301297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Class II, division 1 treatment with Fränkel and Edgewise appliances--a comparative study of mandibular growth and facial esthetics.
    Adenwalla ST; Kronman JH
    Angle Orthod; 1985 Oct; 55(4):281-98. PubMed ID: 3865566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of skeletal and dental changes produced by function regulators (FR-2 and FR-3).
    Kerr WJ; TenHave TR; McNamara JA
    Eur J Orthod; 1989 Aug; 11(3):235-42. PubMed ID: 2792213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment study group--case report.
    Hall AM
    Br J Orthod; 1987 Jan; 14(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 3471279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A cephalometric comparison of orthopedic (Activator) headgear and orthodontic (Edgewise) treatments in Class II, 1 malocclusions].
    Altuğ Z
    Ankara Univ Hekim Fak Derg; 1988 May; 15(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 3271149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy.
    Pancherz H; Malmgren O; Hägg U; Omblus J; Hansen K
    Eur J Orthod; 1989 Feb; 11(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 2714389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Intensive treatment in severe distal bite using the headgear-Herbst appliance in mixed dentition].
    Wieslander L
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed (1984); 1984 Nov; 94(11):1189-206. PubMed ID: 6595787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Treatment of Class II malocclusion using the Herbst appliance].
    Schiavoni R
    Mondo Ortod; 1990; 15(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 2402252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.