BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27738717)

  • 1. Foreknowledge of an impending startling stimulus does not affect the proportion of startle reflexes or latency of StartReact responses.
    Drummond NM; Leguerrier A; Carlsen AN
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Feb; 235(2):379-388. PubMed ID: 27738717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. StartReact effects are dependent on engagement of startle reflex circuits: support for a subcortically mediated initiation pathway.
    Smith V; Maslovat D; Carlsen AN
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Dec; 122(6):2541-2547. PubMed ID: 31642402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An examination of the startle response during upper limb stretch perturbations.
    Forgaard CJ; Franks IM; Maslovat D; Gowan NJ; Kim JC; Chua R
    Neuroscience; 2016 Nov; 337():163-176. PubMed ID: 27664458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sub-threshold transcranial magnetic stimulation applied after the go-signal facilitates reaction time under control but not startle conditions.
    Smith V; Carlsen AN
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 47(4):333-345. PubMed ID: 29356214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does the StartReact Effect Apply to First-Trial Reactive Movements?
    Sutter K; Nonnekes J; Dibilio V; Geurts AC; Weerdesteyn V
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153129. PubMed ID: 27077654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A startling acoustic stimulus interferes with upcoming motor preparation: Evidence for a startle refractory period.
    Maslovat D; Chua R; Carlsen AN; May C; Forgaard CJ; Franks IM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jun; 158():36-42. PubMed ID: 25919668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Timeline of Motor Preparatory State Prior to Response Initiation: Evidence from Startle.
    Smith V; Maslovat D; Drummond NM; Carlsen AN
    Neuroscience; 2019 Jan; 397():80-93. PubMed ID: 30471355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reduced motor preparation during dual-task performance: evidence from startle.
    Maslovat D; Drummond NM; Carter MJ; Carlsen AN
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Sep; 233(9):2673-83. PubMed ID: 26026810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Startle reveals decreased response preparatory activation during a stop-signal task.
    Drummond NM; Cressman EK; Carlsen AN
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Sep; 116(3):986-94. PubMed ID: 27281747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Go-activation endures following the presentation of a stop-signal: evidence from startle.
    Drummond NM; Cressman EK; Carlsen AN
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):403-411. PubMed ID: 27832599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Startle decreases reaction time to active inhibition.
    Carlsen AN; Almeida QJ; Franks IM
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Mar; 217(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 22138667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cortical involvement in the StartReact effect.
    Stevenson AJ; Chiu C; Maslovat D; Chua R; Gick B; Blouin JS; Franks IM
    Neuroscience; 2014 Jun; 269():21-34. PubMed ID: 24680855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bimanual but not unimanual finger movements are triggered by a startling acoustic stimulus: evidence for increased reticulospinal drive for bimanual responses.
    Maslovat D; Teku F; Smith V; Drummond NM; Carlsen AN
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 Dec; 124(6):1832-1838. PubMed ID: 33026906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Startle-triggered responses indicate reticulospinal drive is larger for voluntary shoulder versus finger movements.
    Maslovat D; Santangelo CM; Carlsen AN
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6532. PubMed ID: 37085607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Startle response of human neck muscles sculpted by readiness to perform ballistic head movements.
    Siegmund GP; Inglis JT; Sanderson DJ
    J Physiol; 2001 Aug; 535(Pt 1):289-300. PubMed ID: 11507178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retrospective composite analysis of StartReact data indicates sex differences in simple reaction time are not attributable to response preparation.
    Sadler CM; Peters KJ; Santangelo CM; Maslovat D; Carlsen AN
    Behav Brain Res; 2022 May; 426():113839. PubMed ID: 35306096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of prepulse inhibition timing on the startle reflex and reaction time.
    Maslovat D; Kennedy PM; Forgaard CJ; Chua R; Franks IM
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 Apr; 513(2):243-7. PubMed ID: 22387455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Startle-induced reaction time shortening is not modified by prepulse inhibition.
    Valls-Solé J; Kofler M; Kumru H; Castellote JM; Sanegre MT
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 165(4):541-8. PubMed ID: 15942734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical perturbations can elicit triggered reactions in the absence of a startle response.
    Forgaard CJ; Franks IM; Bennett K; Maslovat D; Chua R
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Feb; 236(2):365-379. PubMed ID: 29151141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Excitability of the pathways mediating the startle reaction before execution of a voluntary movement.
    Kumru H; Valls-Solé J
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 169(3):427-32. PubMed ID: 16273394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.