These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27738717)

  • 1. Foreknowledge of an impending startling stimulus does not affect the proportion of startle reflexes or latency of StartReact responses.
    Drummond NM; Leguerrier A; Carlsen AN
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Feb; 235(2):379-388. PubMed ID: 27738717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An intense electrical stimulus can elicit a StartReact effect but with decreased incidence and later onset of the startle reflex.
    Daher E; Maslovat D; Carlsen AN
    Exp Brain Res; 2024 Oct; 242(10):2405-2417. PubMed ID: 39136724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. StartReact effects are dependent on engagement of startle reflex circuits: support for a subcortically mediated initiation pathway.
    Smith V; Maslovat D; Carlsen AN
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Dec; 122(6):2541-2547. PubMed ID: 31642402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An examination of the startle response during upper limb stretch perturbations.
    Forgaard CJ; Franks IM; Maslovat D; Gowan NJ; Kim JC; Chua R
    Neuroscience; 2016 Nov; 337():163-176. PubMed ID: 27664458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sub-threshold transcranial magnetic stimulation applied after the go-signal facilitates reaction time under control but not startle conditions.
    Smith V; Carlsen AN
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 47(4):333-345. PubMed ID: 29356214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does the StartReact Effect Apply to First-Trial Reactive Movements?
    Sutter K; Nonnekes J; Dibilio V; Geurts AC; Weerdesteyn V
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153129. PubMed ID: 27077654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A startling acoustic stimulus interferes with upcoming motor preparation: Evidence for a startle refractory period.
    Maslovat D; Chua R; Carlsen AN; May C; Forgaard CJ; Franks IM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jun; 158():36-42. PubMed ID: 25919668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Timeline of Motor Preparatory State Prior to Response Initiation: Evidence from Startle.
    Smith V; Maslovat D; Drummond NM; Carlsen AN
    Neuroscience; 2019 Jan; 397():80-93. PubMed ID: 30471355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduced motor preparation during dual-task performance: evidence from startle.
    Maslovat D; Drummond NM; Carter MJ; Carlsen AN
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Sep; 233(9):2673-83. PubMed ID: 26026810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Startle reveals decreased response preparatory activation during a stop-signal task.
    Drummond NM; Cressman EK; Carlsen AN
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Sep; 116(3):986-94. PubMed ID: 27281747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Go-activation endures following the presentation of a stop-signal: evidence from startle.
    Drummond NM; Cressman EK; Carlsen AN
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):403-411. PubMed ID: 27832599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Startle decreases reaction time to active inhibition.
    Carlsen AN; Almeida QJ; Franks IM
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Mar; 217(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 22138667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cortical involvement in the StartReact effect.
    Stevenson AJ; Chiu C; Maslovat D; Chua R; Gick B; Blouin JS; Franks IM
    Neuroscience; 2014 Jun; 269():21-34. PubMed ID: 24680855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bimanual but not unimanual finger movements are triggered by a startling acoustic stimulus: evidence for increased reticulospinal drive for bimanual responses.
    Maslovat D; Teku F; Smith V; Drummond NM; Carlsen AN
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 Dec; 124(6):1832-1838. PubMed ID: 33026906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Startle-triggered responses indicate reticulospinal drive is larger for voluntary shoulder versus finger movements.
    Maslovat D; Santangelo CM; Carlsen AN
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6532. PubMed ID: 37085607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Startle response of human neck muscles sculpted by readiness to perform ballistic head movements.
    Siegmund GP; Inglis JT; Sanderson DJ
    J Physiol; 2001 Aug; 535(Pt 1):289-300. PubMed ID: 11507178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retrospective composite analysis of StartReact data indicates sex differences in simple reaction time are not attributable to response preparation.
    Sadler CM; Peters KJ; Santangelo CM; Maslovat D; Carlsen AN
    Behav Brain Res; 2022 May; 426():113839. PubMed ID: 35306096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of prepulse inhibition timing on the startle reflex and reaction time.
    Maslovat D; Kennedy PM; Forgaard CJ; Chua R; Franks IM
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 Apr; 513(2):243-7. PubMed ID: 22387455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Startle-induced reaction time shortening is not modified by prepulse inhibition.
    Valls-Solé J; Kofler M; Kumru H; Castellote JM; Sanegre MT
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 165(4):541-8. PubMed ID: 15942734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical perturbations can elicit triggered reactions in the absence of a startle response.
    Forgaard CJ; Franks IM; Bennett K; Maslovat D; Chua R
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Feb; 236(2):365-379. PubMed ID: 29151141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.