These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27739229)

  • 1. Accurate tissue characterization in low-dose CT imaging with pure iterative reconstruction.
    Murphy KP; McLaughlin PD; Twomey M; Chan VE; Moloney F; Fung AJ; Chan FE; Kao T; O'Neill SB; Watson B; O'Connor OJ; Maher MM
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2017 Apr; 61(2):190-196. PubMed ID: 27739229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CT Dose Reduction for Visceral Adipose Tissue Measurement: Effects of Model-Based and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstructions and Filtered Back Projection.
    Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Niijima Y; Hashimoto M; Yamada M; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):W677-83. PubMed ID: 26001256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction in CT Enterography.
    Murphy KP; Crush L; Twomey M; McLaughlin PD; Mildenberger IC; Moore N; Bye J; O'Connor OJ; McSweeney SE; Shanahan F; Maher MM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):1173-81. PubMed ID: 26587922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality.
    Shuman WP; Chan KT; Busey JM; Mitsumori LM; Choi E; Koprowicz KM; Kanal KM
    Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 25170546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pure Iterative Reconstruction Improves Image Quality in Computed Tomography of the Abdomen and Pelvis Acquired at Substantially Reduced Radiation Doses in Patients With Active Crohn Disease.
    McLaughlin PD; Murphy KP; Twomey M; OʼNeill SB; Moloney F; OʼConnor OJ; OʼRegan K; McSweeney S; McGarrigle AM; Moore N; Bye J; Shanahan F; Maher MM
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 26760188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CT of the chest with model-based, fully iterative reconstruction: comparison with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Ichikawa Y; Kitagawa K; Nagasawa N; Murashima S; Sakuma H
    BMC Med Imaging; 2013 Aug; 13():27. PubMed ID: 23927627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Volumetric quantification of lung nodules in CT with iterative reconstruction (ASiR and MBIR).
    Chen B; Barnhart H; Richard S; Robins M; Colsher J; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111902. PubMed ID: 24320435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low-dose CT imaging of the acute abdomen using model-based iterative reconstruction: a prospective study.
    Moloney F; James K; Twomey M; Ryan D; Grey TM; Downes A; Kavanagh RG; Moore N; Murphy MJ; Bye J; Carey BW; McSweeney SE; Deasy C; Andrews E; Shanahan F; Maher MM; O'Connor OJ
    Emerg Radiol; 2019 Apr; 26(2):169-177. PubMed ID: 30448900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Model-based iterative reconstruction compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back-projection in CT of the kidneys and the adjacent retroperitoneum.
    Olcott EW; Shin LK; Sommer G; Chan I; Rosenberg J; Molvin FL; Boas FE; Fleischmann D
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):774-84. PubMed ID: 24809318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography.
    Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of pure iterative reconstruction in conventional dose CT enterography.
    Murphy KP; Crush L; McLaughlin PD; O'Sullivan HS; Twomey M; Lynch S; Bye J; McSweeney SE; O'Connor OJ; Shanahan F; Maher MM
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Feb; 40(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 25139642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions: clinical comparison of low-dose abdominal/pelvic computed tomography between adaptive statistical, model-based iterative reconstructions and traditional filtered back projection in 65 patients.
    Vardhanabhuti V; Riordan RD; Mitchell GR; Hyde C; Roobottom CA
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):209-16. PubMed ID: 24368613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of pure and hybrid iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: image quality assessment in the cervicothoracic region.
    Katsura M; Sato J; Akahane M; Matsuda I; Ishida M; Yasaka K; Kunimatsu A; Ohtomo K
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Feb; 82(2):356-60. PubMed ID: 23199752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study.
    Deák Z; Grimm JM; Treitl M; Geyer LL; Linsenmaier U; Körner M; Reiser MF; Wirth S
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 23169793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultra-low-dose CT of the lung: effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality.
    Yanagawa M; Gyobu T; Leung AN; Kawai M; Kawata Y; Sumikawa H; Honda O; Tomiyama N
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):695-703. PubMed ID: 24713541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Submillisievert chest CT with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction techniques.
    Padole A; Singh S; Ackman JB; Wu C; Do S; Pourjabbar S; Khawaja RD; Otrakji A; Digumarthy S; Shepard JA; Kalra M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):772-81. PubMed ID: 25247943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of a suitable low-dose abdominopelvic CT protocol using model-based iterative reconstruction through cadaveric study.
    Moloney F; Twomey M; Fama D; Balta JY; James K; Kavanagh RG; Moore N; Murphy MJ; O'Mahony SM; Maher MM; Cryan JF; O'Connor OJ
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2018 Oct; 62(5):625-633. PubMed ID: 29656596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Model-based iterative reconstruction versus adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection in liver 64-MDCT: focal lesion detection, lesion conspicuity, and image noise.
    Shuman WP; Green DE; Busey JM; Kolokythas O; Mitsumori LM; Koprowicz KM; Thibault JB; Hsieh J; Alessio AM; Choi E; Kinahan PE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):1071-6. PubMed ID: 23617492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms.
    Richard S; Husarik DB; Yadava G; Murphy SN; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4115-22. PubMed ID: 22830744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.