These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27739380)

  • 1. Stimulation parameters differ between current anti-modiolar and peri-modiolar electrode arrays implanted within the same child.
    Polonenko MJ; Cushing SL; Gordon KA; Allemang B; Jewell S; Papsin BC
    J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Nov; 130(11):1007-1021. PubMed ID: 27739380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Packing of the cochleostomy site affects auditory nerve response thresholds in precurved off-stylet cochlear implants.
    Gordin A; Papsin B; Gordon K
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Feb; 31(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 20101160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Delayed low frequency hearing loss caused by cochlear implantation interventions via the round window but not cochleostomy.
    Rowe D; Chambers S; Hampson A; Eastwood H; Campbell L; O'Leary S
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():49-57. PubMed ID: 26739790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraoperative electrically evoked stapedius reflex thresholds in children undergone cochlear implantation: round window and cochleostomy approaches.
    Karatas E; Aud MD; Baglam T; Durucu C; Baysal E; Kanlikama M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Sep; 75(9):1123-6. PubMed ID: 21737149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evolution of cochlear implant arrays result in changes in behavioral and physiological responses in children.
    Gordin A; Papsin B; James A; Gordon K
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):908-15. PubMed ID: 19730148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use.
    Telmesani LM; Said NM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Possibilities for residual hearing preservation with Nucleus CI532 Slim Modiolar electrode array. Case report].
    Nagy R; Jarabin JA; Dimák B; Perényi Á; Tóth F; Szűts V; Jóri J; Kiss JG; Rovó L
    Orv Hetil; 2018 Oct; 159(41):1680-1688. PubMed ID: 30295044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toward a method of achieving balanced stimulation of bilateral auditory nerves: Evidence from children receiving matched and unmatched bilateral cochlear implants simultaneously.
    Tsai P; Wisener N; Papsin BC; Cushing SL; Gordon KA
    Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108445. PubMed ID: 35104716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of stylet removal on neural response telemetry and stapedial reflex thresholds during cochlear implantation.
    Rajati M; Ghassemi MM; Bakhshaee M; Tale MR; Tayarani H
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2014 Jun; 41(3):255-8. PubMed ID: 24359704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multicentre investigation on electrically evoked compound action potential and stapedius reflex: how do these objective measures relate to implant programming parameters?
    Van Den Abbeele T; Noël-Petroff N; Akin I; Caner G; Olgun L; Guiraud J; Truy E; Attias J; Raveh E; Belgin E; Sennaroglu G; Basta D; Ernst A; Martini A; Rosignoli M; Levi H; Elidan J; Benghalem A; Amstutz-Montadert I; Lerosey Y; De Vel E; Dhooge I; Hildesheimer M; Kronenberg J; Arnold L
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 Feb; 13(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 22340749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intra- and postoperative electrode impedance of the straight and Contour arrays of the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: relation to T and C levels.
    van Wermeskerken GK; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):537-44. PubMed ID: 17005497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim modiolar electrode (CI532): a preliminary experience.
    Cuda D; Murri A
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 274(12):4141-4148. PubMed ID: 29032420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cochlear implantees: Analysis of behavioral and objective measures for a clinical population of various age groups.
    Greisiger R; Shallop JK; Hol PK; Elle OJ; Jablonski GE
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015; 16 Suppl 4():1-19. PubMed ID: 26642899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intra- and postoperative electrically evoked stapedius reflex thresholds in children with cochlear implants.
    Baysal E; Karatas E; Deniz M; Baglam T; Durucu C; Karatas ZA; Mumbuc S; Kanlikama M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 May; 76(5):649-52. PubMed ID: 22342227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing.
    Scheperle RA; Tejani VD; Omtvedt JK; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; Oleson JJ; Ozanne MV
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():45-57. PubMed ID: 28432874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of electrically evoked stapedial reflexes in patients with cochlear implants surgically implanted using Veria and posterior tympanotomy approaches.
    Yathiraj A; Manjula P; Geetha C; Jawahar Antony P; Megha
    J Laryngol Otol; 2024 Aug; 138(8):858-863. PubMed ID: 38311334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraindividual comparison of psychophysical parameters between perimodiolar and lateral-type electrode arrays in patients with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Jeong J; Kim M; Heo JH; Bang MY; Bae MR; Kim J; Choi JY
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Feb; 36(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 25473955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Impact of a Cochlear Implant Electrode Array on the Middle Ear Transfer Function.
    Pazen D; Anagiotos A; Nünning M; Gostian AO; Ortmann M; Beutner D
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):e241-e255. PubMed ID: 28207578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cochleostomy versus round window insertions: influence on functional outcomes in electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system.
    Adunka OF; Dillon MT; Adunka MC; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Buchman CA
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Apr; 35(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 24557034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.