189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27739941)
1. Biomechanical evaluation of the craniovertebral junction after unilateral joint-sparing condylectomy: implications for the far lateral approach revisited.
Kshettry VR; Healy AT; Colbrunn R; Beckler DT; Benzel EC; Recinos PF
J Neurosurg; 2017 Oct; 127(4):829-836. PubMed ID: 27739941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stability of the craniovertebral junction after unilateral occipital condyle resection: a biomechanical study.
Vishteh AG; Crawford NR; Melton MS; Spetzler RF; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA
J Neurosurg; 1999 Jan; 90(1 Suppl):91-8. PubMed ID: 10413132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Restabilization of the Occipitocervical Junction After a Complete Unilateral Condylectomy: A Biomechanical Comparison of Unilateral and Bilateral Fixation Techniques.
Eli IM; Karsy M; Brodke DS; Bachus KN; Couldwell WT; Dailey AT; Mazur MD
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2020 Aug; 19(2):157-164. PubMed ID: 31768546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical evaluation of the craniovertebral junction after anterior unilateral condylectomy: implications for endoscopic endonasal approaches to the cranial base.
Perez-Orribo L; Little AS; Lefevre RD; Reyes PR; Newcomb AG; Prevedello DM; Roldan H; Nakaji P; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
Neurosurgery; 2013 Jun; 72(6):1021-29; discussion 1029-30. PubMed ID: 23442513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical analysis of occipitocervical stability afforded by three fixation techniques.
Helgeson MD; Lehman RA; Sasso RC; Dmitriev AE; Mack AW; Riew KD
Spine J; 2011 Mar; 11(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 21377608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical effects of the transcondylar approach on the craniovertebral junction.
Cardoso AC; Fontes RB; Tan LA; Rhoton AL; Roh SW; Fessler RG
Clin Anat; 2015 Jul; 28(5):683-9. PubMed ID: 25914225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating stability of the craniovertebral junction after unilateral C1 lateral mass resection: implications for the direct lateral approach.
Soni P; Loss JG; Gillespie CM; Colbrunn RW; Schlenk R; Steinmetz MP; Recinos PF; Benzel EC; Kshettry VR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 Feb; 36(2):269-275. PubMed ID: 34598153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Craniocervical fixation with occipital condyle screws: biomechanical analysis of a novel technique.
Uribe JS; Ramos E; Youssef AS; Levine N; Turner AW; Johnson WM; Vale FL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(9):931-8. PubMed ID: 20375778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anatomical determinants of occipitocervical fusion in skull base chordoma resection: a systematic review of the literature with illustrative cases.
Golub D; Küffer AF; Garrel S; Zandpazandi S; McBriar JD; Modi S; Papadimitriou K; Costantino PD; Sciubba DM; Dehdashti AR
Neurosurg Focus; 2024 May; 56(5):E8. PubMed ID: 38691866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Occipitocervical Instability After Far-Lateral Transcondylar Surgery: A Biomechanical Analysis.
Mazur MD; Couldwell WT; Cutler A; Shah LM; Brodke DS; Bachus K; Dailey AT
Neurosurgery; 2017 Jan; 80(1):140-145. PubMed ID: 28362894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro biomechanics of the craniocervical junction-a sequential sectioning of its stabilizing structures.
Radcliff KE; Hussain MM; Moldavsky M; Klocke N; Vaccaro AR; Albert TJ; Khalil S; Bucklen B
Spine J; 2015 Jul; 15(7):1618-28. PubMed ID: 25666697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stabilization of the craniocervical junction after an internal dislocation injury: an in vitro study.
Radcliff KE; Hussain MM; Moldavsky M; Klocke NF; Vaccaro A; Albert TJ; Khalil S; Bucklen BS
Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):1070-6. PubMed ID: 25681231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical comparison of occiput-C1-C2 fixation techniques: C0-C1 transarticular screw and direct occiput condyle screw.
Takigawa T; Simon P; Espinoza Orías AA; Hong JT; Ito Y; Inoue N; An HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May; 37(12):E696-701. PubMed ID: 22158063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stabilization of the Craniovertebral Junction with Clivus Plate Constructs: Biomechanical Comparison with Conventional Technique.
Ji W; Tong J; Huang Z; Zheng M; Wu X; Chen J; Zhu Q
World Neurosurg; 2016 Oct; 94():42-49. PubMed ID: 27373937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical evaluation of the craniovertebral junction after inferior-third clivectomy and intradural exposure of the foramen magnum: implications for endoscopic endonasal approaches to the cranial base.
Little AS; Perez-Orribo L; Rodriguez-Martinez NG; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Prevedello DM; Crawford NR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Apr; 18(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 23414005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The far-lateral approach: destruction of the condyle does not necessarily result in clinically evident craniovertebral junction instability.
Shiban E; Török E; Wostrack M; Meyer B; Lehmberg J
J Neurosurg; 2016 Jul; 125(1):196-201. PubMed ID: 26544774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanics of the lower thoracic spine after decompression and fusion: a cadaveric analysis.
Lubelski D; Healy AT; Mageswaran P; Benzel EC; Mroz TE
Spine J; 2014 Sep; 14(9):2216-23. PubMed ID: 24662217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of parasagittal occipital plating: screw load sharing analysis.
Frush TJ; Fisher TJ; Ensminger SC; Truumees E; Demetropoulos CK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(9):877-84. PubMed ID: 19531996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Properties of an interspinous fixation device (ISD) in lumbar fusion constructs: a biomechanical study.
Techy F; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):572-9. PubMed ID: 23498926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
