397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27740549)
1. Comparative microbial source tracking methods for identification of fecal contamination sources at Sunnyside Beach in the Toronto region area of concern.
Staley ZR; Edge TA
J Water Health; 2016 Oct; 14(5):839-850. PubMed ID: 27740549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Microbial and Chemical Source Tracking Markers To Identify Fecal Contamination Sources in the Humber River (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) and Associated Storm Water Outfalls.
Staley ZR; Grabuski J; Sverko E; Edge TA
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2016 Nov; 82(21):6357-6366. PubMed ID: 27542934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microbial Source Tracking Using Quantitative and Digital PCR To Identify Sources of Fecal Contamination in Stormwater, River Water, and Beach Water in a Great Lakes Area of Concern.
Staley ZR; Boyd RJ; Shum P; Edge TA
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Oct; 84(20):. PubMed ID: 30097445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors affecting the presence of human-associated and fecal indicator real-time quantitative PCR genetic markers in urban-impacted recreational beaches.
Molina M; Hunter S; Cyterski M; Peed LA; Kelty CA; Sivaganesan M; Mooney T; Prieto L; Shanks OC
Water Res; 2014 Nov; 64():196-208. PubMed ID: 25061692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Library-dependent and library-independent microbial source tracking to identify spatial variation in faecal contamination sources along a Lake Ontario beach (Ontario, Canada).
Edge TA; Hill S; Seto P; Marsalek J
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(3):719-27. PubMed ID: 20706020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of forty-one microbial source tracking methods: a twenty-seven lab evaluation study.
Boehm AB; Van De Werfhorst LC; Griffith JF; Holden PA; Jay JA; Shanks OC; Wang D; Weisberg SB
Water Res; 2013 Nov; 47(18):6812-28. PubMed ID: 23880218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microbial source tracking (MST) in Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area: Seasonal and precipitation trends in MST marker concentrations, and associations with E. coli levels, pathogenic marker presence, and land use.
McKee BA; Molina M; Cyterski M; Couch A
Water Res; 2020 Mar; 171():115435. PubMed ID: 31927096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distribution and Differential Survival of Traditional and Alternative Indicators of Fecal Pollution at Freshwater Beaches.
Cloutier DD; McLellan SL
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Feb; 83(4):. PubMed ID: 27940538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microbial Source Tracking as a Method of Determination of Beach Sand Contamination.
Valério E; Santos ML; Teixeira P; Matias R; Mendonça J; Ahmed W; Brandão J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jun; 19(13):. PubMed ID: 35805592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and application of a quantitative PCR assay targeting Catellicoccus marimammalium for assessing gull-associated fecal contamination at Lake Erie beaches.
Lee C; Marion JW; Lee J
Sci Total Environ; 2013 Jun; 454-455():1-8. PubMed ID: 23542477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Semi-quantitative evaluation of fecal contamination potential by human and ruminant sources using multiple lines of evidence.
Stoeckel DM; Stelzer EA; Stogner RW; Mau DP
Water Res; 2011 May; 45(10):3225-44. PubMed ID: 21513966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the occurrence and survival of fecal indicator bacteria in recreational sand between urban beach, playground and sandbox settings in Toronto, Ontario.
Staley ZR; Robinson C; Edge TA
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Jan; 541():520-527. PubMed ID: 26432162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gulls identified as major source of fecal pollution in coastal waters: a microbial source tracking study.
Araújo S; Henriques IS; Leandro SM; Alves A; Pereira A; Correia A
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Feb; 470-471():84-91. PubMed ID: 24140684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigation of human sewage pollution and pathogen analysis at Florida Gulf coast beaches.
Korajkic A; Brownell MJ; Harwood VJ
J Appl Microbiol; 2011 Jan; 110(1):174-83. PubMed ID: 21029275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiple lines of evidence to identify the sources of fecal pollution at a freshwater beach in Hamilton Harbour, Lake Ontario.
Edge TA; Hill S
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3585-94. PubMed ID: 17575998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of Bacteroidales quantitative PCR assays targeting human and animal fecal contamination in the public and domestic domains in India.
Odagiri M; Schriewer A; Hanley K; Wuertz S; Misra PR; Panigrahi P; Jenkins MW
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Jan; 502():462-70. PubMed ID: 25285421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enterococcal Concentrations in a Coastal Ecosystem Are a Function of Fecal Source Input, Environmental Conditions, and Environmental Sources.
Rothenheber D; Jones S
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 84(17):. PubMed ID: 30006393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation and application of high-throughput quantitative PCR for the simultaneous detection of microbial source tracking markers in environmental water.
Raya S; Malla B; Thakali O; Angga MS; Segawa T; Sherchand JB; Haramoto E
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Aug; 940():173604. PubMed ID: 38821279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cross-Comparison of Human Wastewater-Associated Molecular Markers in Relation to Fecal Indicator Bacteria and Enteric Viruses in Recreational Beach Waters.
Hughes B; Beale DJ; Dennis PG; Cook S; Ahmed W
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Apr; 83(8):. PubMed ID: 28159789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Same-day Enterococcus qPCR results of recreational water quality at two Toronto beaches provide added public health protection and reduced beach days lost.
Saleem F; Schellhorn HE; Simhon A; Edge TA
Can J Public Health; 2023 Aug; 114(4):676-687. PubMed ID: 37069453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
