These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27741085)

  • 1. Predictability of Biometry in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery.
    Sorkin N; Rosenblatt A; Barequet IS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Dec; 93(12):1545-1551. PubMed ID: 27741085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraocular lens power measured by partial coherence interferometry.
    Hsieh YT; Wang IJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 89(12):1697-701. PubMed ID: 23147857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of three optical biometers: IOLMaster 500, Lenstar LS 900 and Aladdin.
    Ortiz A; Galvis V; Tello A; Viaña V; Corrales MI; Ochoa M; Rodriguez CJ
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Aug; 39(8):1809-1818. PubMed ID: 30136018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of preoperative and postoperative measurements of optical low-coherence reflectometry biometry and assessment of its refractive predictability.
    Akalın İ; Tüfek M; Türkyılmaz M; Öztürk F
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Jun; 39(6):1337-1343. PubMed ID: 29931570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of axial length, anterior chamber depth and intraocular lens power between IOLMaster and ultrasound in normal, long and short eyes.
    Dong J; Zhang Y; Zhang H; Jia Z; Zhang S; Wang X
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194273. PubMed ID: 29543854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Ocular Biometry Using New Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography-based Optical Biometer with Other Devices.
    Cho YJ; Lim TH; Choi KY; Cho BJ
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 32(4):257-264. PubMed ID: 30091303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity and repeatability of the Aladdin ocular biometer.
    Mandal P; Berrow EJ; Naroo SA; Wolffsohn JS; Uthoff D; Holland D; Shah S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb; 98(2):256-8. PubMed ID: 24227803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation results with a new optical biometry device: comparison with the gold standard.
    Kaswin G; Rousseau A; Mgarrech M; Barreau E; Labetoulle M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 40(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 24680520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers and a partial coherence interferometer.
    Yang CM; Lim DH; Kim HJ; Chung TY
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223114. PubMed ID: 31603903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative Efficacy of the New Optical Biometer on Intraocular Lens Power Calculation (AL-Scan versus IOLMaster).
    Ha A; Wee WR; Kim MK
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 32(3):241-248. PubMed ID: 29770644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of Lenstar and IOLMaster for intraocular lens power calculation].
    Huang JH; Yang X; Wang QM; Cheng SM; Chen J
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 48(11):1005-10. PubMed ID: 23302275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation by the IOLMaster in phakic and eyes with hydrophobic acrylic lenses.
    Chang SW; Yu CY; Chen DP
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jul; 116(7):1336-42. PubMed ID: 19427697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a new optical biometry device for measurements of ocular components and its comparison with IOLMaster.
    Huang J; Savini G; Li J; Lu W; Wu F; Wang J; Li Y; Feng Y; Wang Q
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 98(9):1277-81. PubMed ID: 24795336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China.
    Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Savini G; Huang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 26948779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Selected Biometric Parameters in Cataract Patients-A Comparison between Argos
    Porwolik M; Porwolik A; Mrukwa-Kominek E
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Jun; 60(7):. PubMed ID: 39064485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficiency and measurements agreement between swept-source OCT and low-coherence interferometry biometry systems.
    Calvo-Sanz JA; Portero-Benito A; Arias-Puente A
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 256(3):559-566. PubMed ID: 29392397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of postoperative refractive outcomes: IOLMaster® versus immersion ultrasound.
    Whang WJ; Jung BJ; Oh TH; Byun YS; Joo CK
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2012; 43(6):496-9. PubMed ID: 22869383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the new biometer OA-1000 with IOLMaster and Tomey AL-3000.
    Goebels SC; Seitz B; Langenbucher A
    Curr Eye Res; 2013 Sep; 38(9):910-6. PubMed ID: 23841799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of 2 optical biometers and evaluation of the Camellin-Calossi intraocular lens formula for normal cataractous eyes.
    Suto C; Shimamura E; Watanabe I
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2366-72. PubMed ID: 26703484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of biometry with the Pentacam AXL, IOLMaster 700 and IOLMaster 500 in cataract patients].
    Wang ZY; Yang WL; Li DJ; Chen W; Zhao Q; Li YF; Cui R; Shen L; Xian JF
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 55(7):515-521. PubMed ID: 31288355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.