These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27741540)

  • 1. Adult Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Clinical Practice: How I Report it.
    Messina C; Sconfienza LM; Bandirali M; Guglielmi G; Ulivieri FM
    Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2016 Jul; 20(3):246-253. PubMed ID: 27741540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pediatric dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in clinical practice: What the clinicians need to know.
    Messina C; Lastella G; Sorce S; Piodi LP; Rodari G; Giavoli C; Marchelli D; Guglielmi G; Ulivieri FM
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Aug; 105():153-161. PubMed ID: 30017273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The usefulness of dual energy X-ray and laser absorptiometry of the calcaneus versus dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of hip and spine in diagnosing manifest osteoporosis.
    de Klerk G; van der Velde D; van der Palen J; van Bergeijk L; Hegeman JH
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Feb; 129(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 18825395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peripheral DXA measurement around ankle joint to diagnose osteoporosis as assessed by central DXA measurement.
    Sung KH; Choi Y; Cho GH; Chung CY; Park MS; Lee KM
    Skeletal Radiol; 2018 Aug; 47(8):1111-1117. PubMed ID: 29404660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DXA in vivo BMD methodology: an erroneous and misleading research and clinical gauge of bone mineral status, bone fragility, and bone remodelling.
    Bolotin HH
    Bone; 2007 Jul; 41(1):138-54. PubMed ID: 17481978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry.
    El-Desouki MI; Sherafzal MS; Othman SA
    Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone densitometry and pitfalls in the assessment of osteoporosis: a primer for the practicing clinician.
    Wong CP; Gani LU; Chong LR
    Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Aug; 15(1):135. PubMed ID: 32833113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Utility of DXA for monitoring, technical aspects of DXA BMD measurement and precision testing.
    Carey JJ; Delaney MF
    Bone; 2017 Nov; 104():44-53. PubMed ID: 28554549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Bone and Calcium Research Update 2015. Recent advances in clinical assessment of trabecular bone architecture: trabecular bone score (TBS)].
    Sone T
    Clin Calcium; 2015 Jan; 25(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 25530526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A preliminary dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based finite element model for assessing osteoporotic hip fracture risk.
    Luo Y; Ferdous Z; Leslie WD
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Dec; 225(12):1188-95. PubMed ID: 22320058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical applications of bone density testing for osteoporosis.
    Lewiecki EM
    Minerva Med; 2005 Oct; 96(5):317-30. PubMed ID: 16227947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analytic and quantitative exposition of patient-specific systematic inaccuracies inherent in planar DXA-derived in vivo BMD measurements.
    Bolotin HH
    Med Phys; 1998 Feb; 25(2):139-51. PubMed ID: 9507473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimizing DXA to Assess Skeletal Health: Key Concepts for Clinicians.
    Kennel KA; Sfeir JG; Drake MT
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2020 Dec; 105(12):. PubMed ID: 32894765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of DXA bone density scans in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis.
    Blake GM; Fogelman I
    Postgrad Med J; 2007 Aug; 83(982):509-17. PubMed ID: 17675543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of the World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool to predict need for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning in postmenopausal women.
    Chao AS; Chen FP; Lin YC; Huang TS; Fan CM; Yu YW
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 54(6):722-5. PubMed ID: 26700992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the forearm using general purpose spiral whole-body CT scanners: accuracy, precision and comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
    Engelke K; Libanati C; Liu Y; Wang H; Austin M; Fuerst T; Stampa B; Timm W; Genant HK
    Bone; 2009 Jul; 45(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 19345291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The utility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, calcaneal quantitative ultrasound, and fracture risk indices (FRAX® and Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument) for the identification of women with distal forearm or hip fractures: A pilot study.
    Esmaeilzadeh S; Cesme F; Oral A; Yaliman A; Sindel D
    Endocr Res; 2016 Aug; 41(3):248-60. PubMed ID: 26864472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The clinical role of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Blake GM; Fogelman I
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):406-14. PubMed ID: 19647962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for diagnosis and fracture risk assessment; WHO-criteria, T- and Z-score, and reference databases.
    Dimai HP
    Bone; 2017 Nov; 104():39-43. PubMed ID: 28041872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hip fracture discrimination from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry by statistical model registration.
    Whitmarsh T; Fritscher KD; Humbert L; del Río Barquero LM; Roth T; Kammerlander C; Blauth M; Schubert R; Frangi AF
    Bone; 2012 Nov; 51(5):896-901. PubMed ID: 22959281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.