These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27742177)

  • 1. Impact of Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction on Coronary Artery Calcium Quantification.
    Messerli M; Rengier F; Desbiolles L; Ehl NF; Bauer RW; Leschka S; Alkadhi H; Wildermuth S; Nähle CP
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Dec; 23(12):1506-1512. PubMed ID: 27742177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Iterative beam-hardening correction with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction in low voltage CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration: Impact on coronary artery calcium quantification and image quality.
    Tesche C; De Cecco CN; Schoepf UJ; Duguay TM; Albrecht MH; Caruso D; Varga-Szemes A; Lesslie VW; Ebersberger U; Canstein C; Thilo C; Hoffmann E; Allmendinger T; Nance JW
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(5):354-359. PubMed ID: 28756086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correction Factors for CT Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Using Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction Instead of Filtered Back Projection.
    Caruso D; De Cecco CN; Schoepf UJ; Felmly LM; Varga-Szemes A; Mangold S; Canstein C; Allmendinger T; Fuller SR; Laghi A; Wichmann JL
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Dec; 23(12):1480-1489. PubMed ID: 27614365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D Integrated with Automatic Tube Current Modulation for CT Coronary Artery Calcium Quantification: Comparison to Traditional Filtered Back Projection in an Anthropomorphic Phantom and Patients.
    Tang YC; Liu YC; Hsu MY; Tsai HY; Chen CM
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Aug; 25(8):1010-1017. PubMed ID: 29395796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of iterative model reconstruction on coronary artery calcium quantification.
    Szilveszter B; Elzomor H; Károlyi M; Kolossváry M; Raaijmakers R; Benke K; Celeng C; Bartykowszki A; Bagyura Z; Lux Á; Merkely B; Maurovich-Horvat P
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jan; 32(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 26285899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques in quantifying coronary calcium.
    Takahashi M; Kimura F; Umezawa T; Watanabe Y; Ogawa H
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 26276567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of deep learning image reconstructions (DLIR) on coronary artery calcium quantification.
    Rossi A; Gennari AG; Etter D; Benz DC; Sartoretti T; Giannopoulos AA; Mikail N; Bengs S; Maurer A; Gebhard C; Buechel RR; Kaufmann PA; Fuchs TA; Messerli M
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Jun; 33(6):3832-3838. PubMed ID: 36480026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction on Agatston Coronary Artery Calcium Scores in Comparison to Filtered Back Projection in Native Cardiac CT.
    Obmann VC; Klink T; Heverhagen JT; Stork A; Laqmani A; Adam G; Begemann PG
    Rofo; 2015 May; 187(5):372-9. PubMed ID: 25962672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finding the optimal dose reduction and iterative reconstruction level for coronary calcium scoring.
    Willemink MJ; den Harder AM; Foppen W; Schilham AM; Rienks R; Laufer EM; Nieman K; de Jong PA; Budde RP; Nathoe HM; Leiner T
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 26342405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of iterative reconstruction on CT coronary calcium quantification.
    Kurata A; Dharampal A; Dedic A; de Feyter PJ; Krestin GP; Dijkshoorn ML; Nieman K
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Dec; 23(12):3246-52. PubMed ID: 24057202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Iterative image reconstruction techniques for CT coronary artery calcium quantification: comparison with traditional filtered back projection in vitro and in vivo.
    Schindler A; Vliegenthart R; Schoepf UJ; Blanke P; Ebersberger U; Cho YJ; Allmendinger T; Vogt S; Raupach R; Fink C; Saam T; Bamberg F; Nikolaou K; Apfaltrer P
    Radiology; 2014 Feb; 270(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 24471388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of advanced modeled iterative reconstruction on interreader agreement in coronary artery measurements.
    Gassenmaier T; Distelmaier I; Weng AM; Bley TA; Klink T
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Sep; 94():201-208. PubMed ID: 28712701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of iterative reconstruction on coronary calcium scores at multiple heart rates: a multivendor phantom study on state-of-the-art CT systems.
    van der Werf NR; Willemink MJ; Willems TP; Greuter MJW; Leiner T
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jun; 34(6):947-957. PubMed ID: 29285725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of CT radiation dose reduction and iterative reconstruction algorithms from four different vendors on coronary calcium scoring.
    Willemink MJ; Takx RA; de Jong PA; Budde RP; Bleys RL; Das M; Wildberger JE; Prokop M; Buls N; de Mey J; Schilham AM; Leiner T
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Sep; 24(9):2201-12. PubMed ID: 24889996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of iterative reconstruction algorithms on machine learning-based coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR
    Li S; Chen C; Qin L; Gu S; Zhang H; Yan F; Yang W
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jun; 36(6):1177-1185. PubMed ID: 32130576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Emphysema quantification and lung volumetry in chest X-ray equivalent ultralow dose CT - Intra-individual comparison with standard dose CT.
    Messerli M; Ottilinger T; Warschkow R; Leschka S; Alkadhi H; Wildermuth S; Bauer RW
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jun; 91():1-9. PubMed ID: 28629554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Influence of Iterative Reconstruction on Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring-Phantom and Clinical Studies.
    Oda S; Utsunomiya D; Nakaura T; Funama Y; Yuki H; Kidoh M; Hirata K; Taguchi N; Honda K; Takaoka H; Iyama Y; Katahira K; Noda K; Oshima S; Tokuyasu S; Yamashita Y
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 27913107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coronary artery calcium scoring: Influence of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction using 64-MDCT.
    Gebhard C; Fiechter M; Fuchs TA; Ghadri JR; Herzog BA; Kuhn F; Stehli J; Müller E; Kazakauskaite E; Gaemperli O; Kaufmann PA
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 167(6):2932-7. PubMed ID: 22959869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noise Reduction in Abdominal Computed Tomography Applying Iterative Reconstruction (ADMIRE).
    Schaller F; Sedlmair M; Raupach R; Uder M; Lell M
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Oct; 23(10):1230-8. PubMed ID: 27318787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determining the radiation dose reduction potential for coronary calcium scanning with computed tomography: an anthropomorphic phantom study comparing filtered backprojection and the adaptive iterative dose reduction algorithm for image reconstruction.
    Blobel J; Mews J; Schuijf JD; Overlaet W
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):857-62. PubMed ID: 23917328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.