198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27742793)
1. Toxicity and Efficacy Probability Interval Design for Phase I Adoptive Cell Therapy Dose-Finding Clinical Trials.
Li DH; Whitmore JB; Guo W; Ji Y
Clin Cancer Res; 2017 Jan; 23(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 27742793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adaptive dose-finding based on safety and feasibility in early-phase clinical trials of adoptive cell immunotherapy.
Wages NA; Fadul CE
Clin Trials; 2020 Apr; 17(2):157-165. PubMed ID: 31856602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Probability intervals of toxicity and efficacy design for dose-finding clinical trials in oncology.
Lin X; Ji Y
Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Mar; 30(3):843-856. PubMed ID: 33327870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. TEPI-2 and UBI: designs for optimal immuno-oncology and cell therapy dose finding with toxicity and efficacy.
Li P; Liu R; Lin J; Ji Y
J Biopharm Stat; 2020 Nov; 30(6):979-992. PubMed ID: 32951518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. STEIN: A simple toxicity and efficacy interval design for seamless phase I/II clinical trials.
Lin R; Yin G
Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(26):4106-4120. PubMed ID: 28786138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Joint i3+3 (Ji3+3) design for phase I/II adoptive cell therapy clinical trials.
Lin X; Ji Y
J Biopharm Stat; 2020 Nov; 30(6):993-1005. PubMed ID: 33225828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A dose-finding approach based on shrunken predictive probability for combinations of two agents in phase I trials.
Hirakawa A; Hamada C; Matsui S
Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(26):4515-25. PubMed ID: 23650098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Bayesian interval dose-finding design addressingOckham's razor: mTPI-2.
Guo W; Wang SJ; Yang S; Lynn H; Ji Y
Contemp Clin Trials; 2017 Jul; 58():23-33. PubMed ID: 28458054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. uTPI: A utility-based toxicity probability interval design for phase I/II dose-finding trials.
Shi H; Cao J; Yuan Y; Lin R
Stat Med; 2021 May; 40(11):2626-2649. PubMed ID: 33650708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Beyond the 3+3 method: expanded algorithms for dose- escalation in Phase I oncology trials of two agents.
Braun TM; Alonzo TA
Clin Trials; 2011 Jun; 8(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 21730075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Design considerations for phase I/II dose finding clinical trials in Immuno-oncology and cell therapy.
Liu R; Lin J; Li P
Contemp Clin Trials; 2020 Sep; 96():106083. PubMed ID: 32659438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Keyboard: A Novel Bayesian Toxicity Probability Interval Design for Phase I Clinical Trials.
Yan F; Mandrekar SJ; Yuan Y
Clin Cancer Res; 2017 Aug; 23(15):3994-4003. PubMed ID: 28546227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Time-to-Event Bayesian Optimal Interval Design to Accelerate Phase I Trials.
Yuan Y; Lin R; Li D; Nie L; Warren KE
Clin Cancer Res; 2018 Oct; 24(20):4921-4930. PubMed ID: 29769209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Uniformly most powerful Bayesian interval design for phase I dose-finding trials.
Lin R; Yin G
Pharm Stat; 2018 Nov; 17(6):710-724. PubMed ID: 30066466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy, Safety, and Reliability of Novel Phase I Trial Designs.
Zhou H; Yuan Y; Nie L
Clin Cancer Res; 2018 Sep; 24(18):4357-4364. PubMed ID: 29661774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bayesian Optimal Interval Design: A Simple and Well-Performing Design for Phase I Oncology Trials.
Yuan Y; Hess KR; Hilsenbeck SG; Gilbert MR
Clin Cancer Res; 2016 Sep; 22(17):4291-301. PubMed ID: 27407096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An adaptive dose-finding design incorporating both toxicity and efficacy.
Zhang W; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar S
Stat Med; 2006 Jul; 25(14):2365-83. PubMed ID: 16220478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dose-finding design driven by efficacy in onco-hematology phase I/II trials.
Seegers V; Chevret S; Resche-Rigon M
Stat Med; 2011 Jun; 30(13):1574-83. PubMed ID: 21394754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bayesian dose-finding designs for combination of molecularly targeted agents assuming partial stochastic ordering.
Guo B; Li Y
Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):859-75. PubMed ID: 25413162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adoptive Cell Therapy: ACT-Up or ACT-Out?
Brenner MK
Mol Ther; 2019 Apr; 27(4):693-694. PubMed ID: 30850208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
