144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27743158)
1. Comparison of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph-3 glaucoma probability score and Moorfields regression analysis of optic nerve head in glaucoma patients and healthy individuals.
Caglar Ç; Gul A; Batur M; Yasar T
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2017 Jan; 255(1):153-161. PubMed ID: 27743158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of disc size and severity of disease on the diagnostic accuracy of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph Glaucoma Probability Score.
Zangwill LM; Jain S; Racette L; Ernstrom KB; Bowd C; Medeiros FA; Sample PA; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jun; 48(6):2653-60. PubMed ID: 17525196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Glaucoma diagnostics.
Geimer SA
Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated analysis of heidelberg retina tomograph optic disc images by glaucoma probability score.
Coops A; Henson DB; Kwartz AJ; Artes PH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5348-55. PubMed ID: 17122123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic ability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 classifications: glaucoma probability score versus Moorfields regression analysis.
Ferreras A; Pajarín AB; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Honrubia FM
Ophthalmology; 2007 Nov; 114(11):1981-7. PubMed ID: 17445899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sector-based analysis with the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.
Oddone F; Centofanti M; Iester M; Rossetti L; Fogagnolo P; Michelessi M; Capris E; Manni G
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1106-11.e1-3. PubMed ID: 19376590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph 3 diagnostic accuracy across disc sizes and glaucoma stages: a multicenter study.
Oddone F; Centofanti M; Rossetti L; Iester M; Fogagnolo P; Capris E; Manni G
Ophthalmology; 2008 Aug; 115(8):1358-65, 1365.e1-3. PubMed ID: 18321579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of the Moorfields Regression Analysis using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph in glaucoma patients with visual field defects.
Medved N; Cvenkel B
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2007; 17(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 17415695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph III classifications in a Turkish primary open-angle glaucoma population.
Bozkurt B; Irkec M; Arslan U
Acta Ophthalmol; 2010 Feb; 88(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 19681791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Glaucoma Detection in High Myopia with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3.
Lee NY; Park HY; Park CK
Semin Ophthalmol; 2015; 30(5-6):377-82. PubMed ID: 24702439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of glaucoma probability score and Moorfields regression analysis to discriminate glaucomatous and healthy eyes.
Takmaz T; Can I
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 19253236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 to discriminate glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes.
De León-Ortega JE; Sakata LM; Monheit BE; McGwin G; Arthur SN; Girkin CA
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 144(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 17693382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic ability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 for glaucoma.
Ferreras A; Pablo LE; Pajarín AB; Larrosa JM; Polo V; Pueyo V
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):354-359. PubMed ID: 18078851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Glaucoma detection with the Heidelberg retina tomograph 3.
Burgansky-Eliash Z; Wollstein G; Bilonick RA; Ishikawa H; Kagemann L; Schuman JS
Ophthalmology; 2007 Mar; 114(3):466-71. PubMed ID: 17141321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensitivity and specificity with the glaucoma probability score in Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II in Japanese eyes.
Saito H; Tomidokoro A; Yanagisawa M; Iwase A; Araie M
J Glaucoma; 2009 Mar; 18(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 19295378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of subjects with a moderate cup to disc ratio using optical coherence tomography and Heidelberg retina tomograph 3: impact of the disc area.
Ulas F; Dogan Ü; Kaymaz A; Çelik F; Çelebi S
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 63(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 25686054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting progression to glaucoma in ocular hypertensive patients.
Strouthidis NG; Gardiner SK; Owen VM; Zuniga C; Garway-Heath DF
J Glaucoma; 2010; 19(5):304-9. PubMed ID: 19730117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the diagnostic ability of Moorfield's regression analysis and glaucoma probability score using Heidelberg retinal tomograph III in eyes with primary open angle glaucoma.
Jindal S; Dada T; Sreenivas V; Gupta V; Sihota R; Panda A
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2010; 58(6):487-92. PubMed ID: 20952832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the glaucoma probability score to earlier heidelberg retina tomograph data analysis tools in classifying normal and glaucoma patients.
Yip LW; Mikelberg FS
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(7):513-6. PubMed ID: 18854725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
