144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27743158)
21. Comparison of data analysis tools for detection of glaucoma with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph.
Ford BA; Artes PH; McCormick TA; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Ophthalmology; 2003 Jun; 110(6):1145-50. PubMed ID: 12799239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. HRT III glaucoma probability score and Moorfields regression across the glaucoma spectrum.
Reddy S; Xing D; Arthur SN; Harizman N; Dorairaj S; Ritch R; Liebmann JM
J Glaucoma; 2009; 18(5):368-72. PubMed ID: 19525726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Morphological features and important parameters of large optic discs for diagnosing glaucoma.
Okimoto S; Yamashita K; Shibata T; Kiuchi Y
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0118920. PubMed ID: 25798580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Glaucoma probability score vs Moorfields classification in normal, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous eyes.
Moreno-Montañés J; Antón A; García N; Mendiluce L; Ayala E; Sebastián A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):360-368. PubMed ID: 18045569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Optic disc classification by the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph and by physicians with varying experience of glaucoma.
Andersson S; Heijl A; Bengtsson B
Eye (Lond); 2011 Nov; 25(11):1401-7. PubMed ID: 21836629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of GDx VCC, HRT I, and clinical assessment of stereoscopic optic nerve head photographs for diagnosing glaucoma.
Reus NJ; de Graaf M; Lemij HG
Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 91(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 17035283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Screening for glaucoma with Moorfields regression analysis and glaucoma probability score in confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.
Kamdeu Fansi AA; Agoumi Y; Harasymowycz PJ
Can J Ophthalmol; 2011 Jun; 46(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 21784211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography a study on diagnostic agreement with Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph.
Leung CK; Ye C; Weinreb RN; Cheung CY; Qiu Q; Liu S; Xu G; Lam DS
Ophthalmology; 2010 Feb; 117(2):267-74. PubMed ID: 19969364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Estimating normative limits of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph optic disc rim area with quantile regression.
Artes PH; Crabb DP
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jan; 51(1):355-61. PubMed ID: 19737891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison between discriminant analysis models and "glaucoma probability score" for the detection of glaucomatous optic nerve head changes.
Iester M; Perdicchi A; Capris E; Siniscalco A; Calabria G; Recupero SM
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 18854729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of the diagnostic capability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomographs 2 and 3 for glaucoma in the Indian population.
Rao HL; Babu GJ; Sekhar GC
Ophthalmology; 2010 Feb; 117(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 19969365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinicians agreement in establishing glaucomatous progression using the Heidelberg retina tomograph.
Vizzeri G; Weinreb RN; Martinez de la Casa JM; Alencar LM; Bowd C; Balasubramanian M; Medeiros FA; Sample P; Zangwill LM
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jan; 116(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 19010552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Specifity of optic disc evaluation in healthy subjects with large optic discs and physiologic cupping using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy].
Plange N; Hirsch T; Bienert M; Remky A
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2014 Feb; 231(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 23775290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of parameters from Heidelberg Retina Tomographs 2 and 3.
Gabriele ML; Wollstein G; Bilonick RA; Burgansky-Eliash Z; Ishikawa H; Kagemann LE; Schuman JS
Ophthalmology; 2008 Apr; 115(4):673-7. PubMed ID: 17719642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of disc damage likelihood scale, cup to disc ratio, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in the diagnosis of glaucoma.
Danesh-Meyer HV; Gaskin BJ; Jayusundera T; Donaldson M; Gamble GD
Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Apr; 90(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 16547323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Sensitivity and specificity of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II Version 3.0 in a population-based study: the Tajimi Study.
Saito H; Tsutsumi T; Araie M; Tomidokoro A; Iwase A
Ophthalmology; 2009 Oct; 116(10):1854-61. PubMed ID: 19660814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of optical coherence tomography and heidelberg retinal tomography parameters in detecting early and moderate glaucoma.
Naithani P; Sihota R; Sony P; Dada T; Gupta V; Kondal D; Pandey RM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 48(7):3138-45. PubMed ID: 17591883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Sensitivity of confocal laser tomography versus optical coherence tomography in detecting advanced glaucoma.
Hewitt AW; Chappell AJ; Straga T; Landers J; Mills RA; Craig JE
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Dec; 37(9):836-41; quiz 903-4. PubMed ID: 20092591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Combining multiple HRT parameters using the 'Random Forests' method improves the diagnostic accuracy of glaucoma in emmetropic and highly myopic eyes.
Asaoka R; Iwase A; Tsutsumi T; Saito H; Otani S; Miyata K; Murata H; Mayama C; Araie M
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Apr; 55(4):2482-90. PubMed ID: 24609628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
