These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27743214)

  • 1. Pain perception during debridement of hypersensitive teeth elicited by two ultrasonic scalers.
    Müller S; Huber H; Goebel G; Wimmer G; Kapferer-Seebacher I
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jun; 21(5):1559-1564. PubMed ID: 27743214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patients' perception of pain during ultrasonic debridement: a comparison between piezoelectric and magnetostrictive scalers.
    Muhney KA; Dechow PC
    J Dent Hyg; 2010; 84(4):185-9. PubMed ID: 21047464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pain during prophylaxis treatment elicited by two power-driven instruments.
    Kocher T; Rodemerk B; Fanghänel J; Meissner G
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):535-8. PubMed ID: 15842271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomised controlled trial to determine patient experience of a magnetostrictive stack scaler as compared to a piezoelectric scaler, in supportive periodontal therapy.
    Daly S; Newcombe RG; Claydon NCA; Seong J; Davies M; West NX
    J Dent; 2020 Feb; 93():103279. PubMed ID: 31931025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Displacement amplitude of ultrasonic scaler inserts.
    Lea SC; Landini G; Walmsley AD
    J Clin Periodontol; 2003 Jun; 30(6):505-10. PubMed ID: 12795788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of scaler tip design on root surface roughness, tooth substance loss and patients' pain perception: an in vitro and a randomised clinical trial.
    Abdul Hayei NA; Yahya NA; Safii SH; Saub R; Vaithilingam RD; Baharuddin NA
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Mar; 21(1):169. PubMed ID: 33789646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrasonic scaler tip performance under various load conditions.
    Lea SC; Landini G; Walmsley AD
    J Clin Periodontol; 2003 Oct; 30(10):876-81. PubMed ID: 14629574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Position paper: sonic and ultrasonic scalers in periodontics. Research, Science and Therapy Committee of the American Academy of Periodontology.
    Drisko CL; Cochran DL; Blieden T; Bouwsma OJ; Cohen RE; Damoulis P; Fine JB; Greenstein G; Hinrichs J; Somerman MJ; Iacono V; Genco RJ;
    J Periodontol; 2000 Nov; 71(11):1792-801. PubMed ID: 11128930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new ultrasonic device in maintenance therapy: perception of pain and clinical efficacy.
    Kocher T; Fanghänel J; Schwahn C; Rühling A
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Apr; 32(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 15811062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Periodontal healing after non-surgical therapy with a modified sonic scaler: a controlled clinical trial.
    Christgau M; Männer T; Beuer S; Hiller KA; Schmalz G
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Oct; 33(10):749-58. PubMed ID: 16889629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preservation of root cementum: a comparative evaluation of power-driven versus hand instruments.
    Bozbay E; Dominici F; Gokbuget AY; Cintan S; Guida L; Aydin MS; Mariotti A; Pilloni A
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2018 May; 16(2):202-209. PubMed ID: 27860247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of basic periodontal therapy using sonic and ultrasonic scalers.
    Loos B; Kiger R; Egelberg J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1987 Jan; 14(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 3543066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparison of treatment effect between periodontal subgingival scaling with the special series of ultrasonic inserts and Gracey curette].
    Huang Z; Yu XQ; Zhang L; Shang X; Piao MZ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Sep; 47(9):513-7. PubMed ID: 23141722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of ultrasonic subgingival debridement versus ultrasonic subgingival scaling combined with manual root planing in the treatment of periodontitis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Yan Y; Zhan Y; Wang X; Hou J
    Trials; 2020 Jan; 21(1):113. PubMed ID: 31992331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effectiveness of an aerosol reduction device for ultrasonic scalers.
    King TB; Muzzin KB; Berry CW; Anders LM
    J Periodontol; 1997 Jan; 68(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 9029451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of the Vector scaler system on human teeth: a systematic review.
    Slot DE; Koster TJ; Paraskevas S; Van der Weijden GA
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2008 Aug; 6(3):154-65. PubMed ID: 18768018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Root-dentin sensitivity following non-surgical periodontal treatment.
    Tammaro S; Wennström JL; Bergenholtz G
    J Clin Periodontol; 2000 Sep; 27(9):690-7. PubMed ID: 10983603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subjective intensity of pain during supportive periodontal treatment using a sonic scaler or an Er:YAG laser.
    Braun A; Jepsen S; Deimling D; Ratka-Krüger P
    J Clin Periodontol; 2010 Apr; 37(4):340-5. PubMed ID: 20447257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical use of an aerosol-reduction device with an ultrasonic scaler.
    Harrel SK
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1996 Dec; 17(12):1185-93; quiz 1194. PubMed ID: 9161132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trauma from instrumentation after non-surgical periodontal treatment with ultrasonic scalers and Nd:YAG laser.
    Dilsiz A; Sevinc S
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 Feb; 73(2):144-9. PubMed ID: 25252593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.