These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27743261)

  • 1. Salience drives non-spatial feature repetition effects in cueing tasks.
    Huffman G; Al-Aidroos N; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):212-222. PubMed ID: 27743261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Masked stimuli modulate endogenous shifts of spatial attention.
    Palmer S; Mattler U
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Jun; 22(2):486-503. PubMed ID: 23528730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The neglected contribution of memory encoding in spatial cueing: A new theory of costs and benefits.
    Chen H; Wyble B
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Nov; 125(6):936-968. PubMed ID: 30080067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the costs and benefits of repeating a nonspatial feature in an exogenous spatial cuing paradigm.
    Klein RM; Wang Y; Dukewich KR; He S; Hu K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2293-304. PubMed ID: 26153659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-modal cueing in audiovisual spatial attention.
    Blurton SP; Greenlee MW; Gondan M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2356-76. PubMed ID: 26001381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Responding to the direction of the eyes: in search of the masked gaze-cueing effect.
    Al-Janabi S; Finkbeiner M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):148-61. PubMed ID: 24132711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing the role of response repetition in spatial priming in visual search.
    Hilchey MD; Leber AB; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1362-1374. PubMed ID: 29949117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple attentional control settings at distinct locations without the confounding of repetition priming.
    Cho SA; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1718-1730. PubMed ID: 29959663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Components of task switching: a closer look at task switching and cue switching.
    Schmitz F; Voss A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():184-96. PubMed ID: 25004102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The representational basis of positive and negative repetition effects.
    Cochrane BA; Milliken B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Mar; 46(3):252-263. PubMed ID: 31697156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing.
    He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revising the link between microsaccades and the spatial cueing of voluntary attention.
    Meyberg S; Sinn P; Engbert R; Sommer W
    Vision Res; 2017 Apr; 133():47-60. PubMed ID: 28163059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of central and peripheral cueing on perceptual and saccade performance.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Vision Res; 2018 Feb; 143():26-33. PubMed ID: 29262304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feature-based attention elicited by precueing in an orientation discrimination task.
    Huang D; Xue L; Wang M; Hu Q; Bu X; Chen Y
    Vision Res; 2018 Jul; 148():15-25. PubMed ID: 29763696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Same-location costs in peripheral cueing: The role of cue awareness and feature changes.
    Schoeberl T; Ditye T; Ansorge U
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):433-451. PubMed ID: 28816482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contextual cueing improves attentional guidance, even when guidance is supposedly optimal.
    Harris AM; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 May; 43(5):926-940. PubMed ID: 28230395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction.
    Dombert PL; Fink GR; Vossel S
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):685-94. PubMed ID: 26586268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Repetition priming in selective attention: A TVA analysis.
    Ásgeirsson ÁG; Kristjánsson Á; Bundesen C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Sep; 160():35-42. PubMed ID: 26163225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attention-shift vs. response-priming explanations for the spatial cueing effect in cross-modal tasks.
    Paavilainen P; Illi J; Moisseinen N; Niinisalo M; Ojala K; Reinikainen J; Vainio L
    Scand J Psychol; 2016 Jun; 57(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 26926651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.