These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Task-relevant information is prioritized in spatiotemporal contextual cueing. Higuchi Y; Ueda Y; Ogawa H; Saiki J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2397-2410. PubMed ID: 27566325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cultural differences in visual attention: Implications for distraction processing. Amer T; Ngo KW; Hasher L Br J Psychol; 2017 May; 108(2):244-258. PubMed ID: 26946068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The influence of cueing on attentional focus in perceptual decision making. Yang CT; Little DR; Hsu CC Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2256-75. PubMed ID: 24939235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition? Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Explaining response-repetition effects in task switching: evidence from switching cue modality suggests episodic binding and response inhibition. Koch I; Frings C; Schuch S Psychol Res; 2018 May; 82(3):570-579. PubMed ID: 28286905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Does feature-based attention play a role in the episodic retrieval of event files? Huffman G; Hilchey MD; Weidler BJ; Mills M; Pratt J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Mar; 46(3):241-251. PubMed ID: 32077740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention. Schmitt M; Postma A; De Haan E Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):105-30. PubMed ID: 10718066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Processing of task-irrelevant natural scenes in social anxiety. Moriya J; Tanno Y Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):162-70. PubMed ID: 21696695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Automatic sequential response priming and intentional response preparation in choice reaction tasks: evidence from response repetition and response cuing. Adam JJ; Koch I Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Sep; 132(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 19559396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Temporal position priming: memory traces of recent experience bias the allocation of attention in time. Yashar A; Lamy D J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1443-56. PubMed ID: 23339347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Functional mechanisms of probabilistic inference in feature- and space-based attentional systems. Dombert PL; Kuhns A; Mengotti P; Fink GR; Vossel S Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 142():553-564. PubMed ID: 27523448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effect of pre-cueing on spatial attention across perception and action. Israel MM; Jolicoeur P; Cohen A Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1840-1846. PubMed ID: 29110247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect. Xu B; Tanaka JW Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 25190323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Multiple cueing dissociates location- and feature-based repetition effects. Hu K; Zhan J; Li B; He S; Samuel AG Vision Res; 2014 Aug; 101():73-81. PubMed ID: 24907677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. On the source and scope of priming effects of masked stimuli on endogenous shifts of spatial attention. Palmer S; Mattler U Conscious Cogn; 2013 Jun; 22(2):528-44. PubMed ID: 23562857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Only pre-cueing but no retro-cueing effects emerge with masked arrow cues. Janczyk M; Reuss H Conscious Cogn; 2016 May; 42():93-100. PubMed ID: 26998561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]